“Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost.” – Thomas Jefferson

By Mark Aurelius

There sure seems like there are a lot of conspiracy theory deniers here in America?

Moreover, some don’t just politely disagree when they want to deny conspiracies, rather they do so with a scorn and self-righteousness that equals the heft of a dump truck full of drit smashing into a row of concrete slabs or roadside dividers. You know: like some crazy or sociopathic wrath gone berserk: “How dare you think and communicate such thoughts!” “You must be punished.”

Granted, many people who disagree with a person’s enthusiasm to explore certain ‘strange’ ideas do so with more tact but the effect is the same—closure—not interested—that you very much.

Censors in some social worlds will not allow for freedom of thought and freedom of speech—because in essence this is what we are really talking about: censorship versus free speech.

Thomas Jefferson famously stated: “Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost.”

You too can easily find dozens of quotations on the Internet on this topic of free speech—because it is so very vital to human freedom and dignity, as well as to a vigorous intellectual social milieu in general.

In fact, free speech is so vital to freedom in general that even conspiracy theory ‘CT’ deniers should be allowed to criticize CT asserters just as theorists should equally be allowed to respond back to denier claims. After all this is what stimulates thought and personal and social growth—the give and take within worthy debate.

Goodreads.com (a website on the book marketplace) has a website page dedicated to quotations on free speech, starting with George Orwell:

“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.”

Sounds obnoxious? Perhaps so but that is what it means—some people are not going to be happy in a world of freedom for the common people.

Another Orwellian quote from this same webpage goes:

“Once a government is committed to the principle of silencing the voice of opposition, it has only one way to go, and that is down the path of increasingly repressive measures, until it becomes a source of terror to all its citizens and creates a country where everyone lives in fear.” [from Special Message to the Congress on the Internal Security of the United States, August 8, 1950]”
― Harry S. Truman

One last quote from this page: “Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech.”
― Benjamin Franklin

These are not platitudes for our times. These are vital principles that we must understand and fight to maintain.

One more from another webpage FreedomForum.Org:

“Our freedom of speech is freedom or death, we got to fight the powers that be!” ― Chuck D, rapper, Public Enemy.

Yes, you read that right: Freedom of Speech or Death! On this planet the battle is this politically severe. There is no room for compromise—not on this topic . You either have free speech or you do not.

This is why some CT-Deniers, some being arrogantly self-assured in their sanctimoniousness (like Main-Stream Media talking heads) who choose to haughtily chastise CTs as if their opinions should be the last word—yes they too must also be tolerated even with their miserly imaginations and spirits—as long as they do not call for the suppression of alternative ideas—which they especially like do.

Moreover, this subject is far more than just being academic, as tyrants in power, or those who aspire to exercise power equally find ways to use the law, along with not so astute or unethical lawyers, to stifle the liberty of free speech.

Decades ago, already, the very phrase “conspiracy theorist” was selected and degraded by dissimulators who worked for the CIA. They put out a memo explained in the following podcast. Go to 33 minutes and 25 seconds:

Meet ANDY WILSON: Internet Clown and Laughingstock But He Doesn’t Know It

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PyD-trVzJxs

Herein we get introduced to a “CIA dispatch that everybody must read … world famous CIA memorandum 1035-960 dated 04-01-1967” meant to instruct people how to debunk “conspiracy theories” (initially to provide cover against those questioning the Warren Commission and their report on the JFK assassination).

It’s basically a template methodology of ten points to belittle any so-called conspiracy theory, which already then 50 years ago helped establish the generalization in which just by calling so and so a CT would cast a spell of suspicion over anyone operating in a theoretical mode of cover-ups. And yes, people, upon hearing this Pavlovian dog-whistle could then choose to essentially or automatically disregard that person’s point of view. Checkmate. The power of charging language.

Except there is one problem. Some people are more astute to psychological manipulation. Some are more curious and independent-minded. They like to do their own research and reach their own conclusions. They want to examine the case with their own methods often looking at the primary sources.

If you have ever studied the psychology of fairy lore you may understand—fairies tend to be a bit more capricious, curious, humorous and wayward—why? Because they are not as easily brainwashed and misled as are the more common lot of humanity. For example they are not as easily misled by deceit and foolishness. They chuckle and chortle at a common man’s naivete—they laugh at the grift and grifters no matter how many or overwhelming their numbers. So, in essence they, at least some, have high degrees of clairvoyance—they are quick, insightful and penetrating.

And this is precisely the attributes more people need to rally because anyone who knows anything knows mankind has all kinds of people who act in all manner of ways—including being criminal and engaging in all manner of deception to get over on others.

Only an idiot of great magnitude could be conditioned to feel ashamed because he or she suspected another person of wrong-doing, or who had conspired with one of more persons to do something considered by others as wrong. To suggest that people who have a capacity or tendency to be suspicious of human nature are people who have weak or faulty thinking skills is a rather pathetic argument—is it not?

Because we all, or most of us, know people do bad things, and sometimes when they choose to do such things they may equally employ tactics of labeling others suspicious of their badness as paranoid or psychologically flawed. This is pretty common-sensical? It doesn’t take a genius with five degrees to realize human nature is pretty broad.

To put this in more concrete perspective, take the prominent case of Candace Owens and her persistence of advocating for a fair trial for Tyler Robinson—a young man, she and many others, believe is being set up as a patsy, fall-guy for the crime of murder of Charlie Kirk.

She has a huge podcast audience around the world because smart people recognize her intelligence, courage and moral levels of integrity. Nevertheless, she is being viciously attacked by powerful forces—both those with names and others behind the scenes who have a great deal of power and ability to engage in the dark arts—deception and name-calling being two of the most common.

Candace Owens vs Andrew Wilson: The Great Debate

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aPOyk1i2LOc

“Hey, yeah, Charlie was starting to ask questions.” I think after October 7th, it’s reasonable that people are starting to reexamine our relationship uh with Israel. We wouldn’t be here today. But it has been lie after lie after lie, debunk after debunk after debunk. … I look at what the organization [TPUSA] has become, the people that they are partnering with, the lies that they are telling, uh, the extraordinary people that they’re sending out to say that I never I hadn’t speak to Charlie since 2018. And it begins to look like a conspiracy. And just as a historical fact, that entire term was created by the CIA to gaslight people after the assassination of JFK. … like calling somebody a conspiracy theorist is essentially saying that they demand further answers. They’re not accepting the fed’s slop. …”

Do you like that neologism (new word) Fed slop. It got rolling last year, here is how the urbane UrbanDictionary.Com defines it with even an example—from—can you guess:

“Fedslop” is an informal, derogatory slang term used by some people to describe government rhetoric they view as dishonest, manipulative, or empty. It typically refers to official statements, talking points, or narratives that critics believe are intentionally misleading yet presented as unquestionable truth. The word combines “federal” with the imagery of “slop,” implying that the government is feeding the public information of low quality and expecting them to accept it without scrutiny.

“Once I heard the official press-release about the Charlie Kirk murder investigation, I couldn’t help but think it was just more fedslop — slickly packaged language expecting everyone to swallow it without asking hard questions.”

Candace, within this serious debate—actually with someone forwarded to slop up the facts of the debate, that she was not so much acting as what people might think of as fairy-loric tendencies as described above, but overall, it is this level of her sober-seriousness that balances out her often poised aplomb and assurance to laugh off the many feckless attacks that have been made against her.

Moreover, she is very well aware of the dark agencies of human nature that are playing a profound part in all the politics that goes on in this corrupt society—including at the federal level—in which the DOJ and FBI have done nothing to assure a fair trial for Tyler Robinson. That broadcast, as well as several of her past podcasts, people, will be the closest window you will likely come to understanding the real issues of the Charlie Kirk assassination.

Or should the American audience simply settle for the deceit and lies meted out by the Federal government, the State government of Utah, several current leaders of the organization Kirk once ran—namely TPUSA, and all manner of detractors like the Christian-Zionist pastors and military connections who all somehow got wrapped up in this elaborate but real set of conspiracies (including as well the many pro-Zionist, pro-Israel, advocates who want to deny Kirk was changing his mind about America’s relationship with Israel—such as him denouncing the idea of the U.S. attacking Iran for the sake of Israel—and him going so far as personally telling this sentiment as a warning and admonition directly to Donald Trump).

All this is psychological warfare on steroids.

And the reason why curious people have found out the many cases of canned worms surrounding this case of assassination is because there still resides some freedom of speech in our country—even as it is most definitely and heavily being attacked.

However real revelations and truths are not much found in the mainstream legacy media—MSM.

Rather it is because courageous and idealist people like Candace and other investigative contributors who have had the fortitude and moral determination to challenge the many liars and manipulators out there who are willing to engage in any and all form of deception to get their devious ways.

And this is precisely what we Americans especially need to comprehend—this world is composed of people who will use any and every form of deception and crime to get over on others, or to get their national and imperial way—no lie or crime is too brazen. No tactic too questionable—including the milking for sympathy and empathy where none should exist.

Take the fact that Israelis and Zionist hasbara news media corporations lied to the world about what really took place on October 7ᵗʰ 2023 when Hamas attacked Occupier Israelis. Then we were told by many prominent Israeli politicians, IDF soldiers, and all manner of Jewish media personalities that the Hamas soldiers were cruelly killing Israeli children. Over and over this lie was used to build up the psychological warfare excuse to do great damage against the Palestinian population in Gaza—used to justify the massive slaughter of eventually tens of thousands of children, women and including elderly—as indiscriminate genocide. Essentially using children as human shields while attacking every civilian infrastructure in the land. Not just blatant lies but the great forms of inhumanity and cruelty.

This is the real nature of some people. They deserve no trust. Only the closest and most diligent forms of scrutiny. Only the greatest of due diligence—attention and great care as if you are dealing with people who are truly capable of great danger—and in fact even glory in their cruelty towards others they think inferior. They deserve absolutely no trust of any kind. The world has witnessed many episodes of their despicable and sociopathic behavior.

Humanity then is capable of great evil and great deceit. Some people and groups will use any form deceit and crime to get their way. Honest and intelligent human beings know this is how human nature works.

So why is it so easy for some real conspiracy deniers to be able to get over on the masses by claiming that some inquiries and counter-arguments are too much beyond the pale to investigate?

Why should people feel bad or apologetic if they suspect others are equally using a similar sympathy card as in: “Haven’t those parents suffered enough after it has been reported by the MSM their children were murdered in cold blood as reported in a mass shooting event—even if plentiful and substantive arguments claim such children were not murdered at all? Why cannot doubts and counter arguments be allowed a fair-hearing by way of free speech and open discussion or debate?

I’m specifically referring now to the Sandy Hook School shootings as reported by the mockingbird mainstream media. Some experts and numerous citizen journalists have declared such an event was faked in the conspiratorial sense. They claim the event was staged to use as a significant political event to create more laws against the 2ⁿᵈ Amendment, and that the some of the people involved were connected to the highest levels of Democratic Party including President Barack Obama. They equally claim that if people look at all the many incongruities and discrepancies it is in fact easy to understand the public was not given the truth by any sense of the imagination.

Moreover, they imply through study of the media’s own revelation, the people who claim to be parents of the dead children, some, were actually actors playing a part of a staged event, and moreover some literally made millions of dollars by heavily focusing on soliciting sympathy fund-raising that ironically became a cash-cow enterprise.

When you actually look at some alternative podcasts that can be found at Bitchute.com (alternative video website to Youtube.com as not as censoring) you likely will realize there are seemingly a ton of missing answers to reasonable questions that cast doubts on the official story. In fact, it seems to be, once one goes into this rabbit hole, it appears to one of the most cockamamie stories ever to have been concocted and then covered up. It is nothing but unanswered questions. Really, you need to wonder how it was possible for this to be consumed by so many seemingly gullible American people.

Recent videos are surfacing on the Internet about this shooting that happened a dozen years ago—why? Because the 1.5-billion dollar judgment against Alex Jones and his platform InfoWars.com has put a real chill on freedom of speech.

Their psychological warfare tactic of appealing to the wholesome empathy of Americans to not challenge the suffering of the parents’ version of events—who have already suffered the brutal deaths of their children is another example of destroying free inquiry by disregarding and scoffing off skeptical yet perspicacious minds.

Yes, it is a minority of true woke people who again have realized they are being served more slop—maybe not officially fed-slop but sloppy, mucky, garbage slop nevertheless—regardless as to whether they call it Epstein-class slop or just plain hog slop—it still is imbued with contempt for animal classes of creature—to fatten us on palliatives.

If those parents’ words and attitudes and feelings are so sacrosanct why did some of them act so weirdly incongruous on TV news shows in the first place. Why was it they especially who cast doubts on their own credibility?

And why should the cornerstone of freedom—namely free speech be so easily destroyed, especially when it is clear the agenda of severely weakening the 1st and 2ⁿᵈ Amendments was part of their devil’s bargain?

More importantly the cowardly Supreme Court did not have the courage to take up Alex Jones appeal! 1.5 billion because he doubted the MSM version? This is too another example of how even the third branch of government—the legal system—too has become more politicized and corrupt.

Wake up. Open your eyes! Investigate the theories. Get a more informed opinion. And make up your own better minds. Americans you are better than this. Do not let those know-it-alls damn you and your too-trusting foolishness.

Frankly, this is a hill worthy dying on.

“Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.” ― United Nations, Universal Declaration of Human Rights

The United States signed the UN UDHR. This is law as written in plain sight.

Amen

P.S. Israel, you are coming down your mountain, you and your Yahweh, Amen.

____
https://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2026/08/19/is-it-appropriate-to-question#more61687