The Contradictive Convolutions of “Quantum-Science”

In this article, we delve into the foundational misunderstandings of “quantum-science” & the inherent delusions involved in terms like “quantum entanglement”, “quantum materials” & “quantum mechanics”

Anne O

“The more clearly we can focus our attention on the wonders and realities of the universe about us, the less taste we shall have for destruction.”
― Rachel Carson

Many scientists and researchers today purport that the macro world operates differently than the subatomic “quantum” world which is simply not true. Natural Law is clear; the micro shares the same laws as the macro—as above, so below, as within, so without.

We should just call it what it is—subatomic, teeny tiny, super small, microscopic, itty bitty, etc.—and do away with using any “quantum” terminology. When we define things clearly for what they really are, natural understanding results. When we make up silly words like “quantum” to explain things we still do not comprehend fully, we neglect the higher knowledge that has existed throughout the ages, and that many have mastered without any need for anything “quantum”, we only limit ourselves. Once we return to concentrating on the laws of nature, we will go through an evolutionary leap—not a “quantum-leap”.

Remember, words matter and have real creative power to either expand or limit processes and one’s capacities. The word “quantum” is actually defined as the “the smallest, indivisible unit or ‘packet’ of any physical property, such as energy, light, or matter. Instead of being continuous, these properties exist in discrete, measurable amounts. It derives from the Latin for “how much,” referring to the minimum amount of something.”

So when we say we want to go through a “quantum-leap” or gain “quantum consciousness”, we really are restricting ourselves unknowingly.

“If all this damned quantum jumping were really here to stay, I should be sorry. I should be sorry I ever got involved with quantum theory.”

—Erwin Schrodinger, Austrian–Irish theoretical physicist who developed fundamental results in quantum theory.

Consider the possibility that “quantum science” is being promoted to deliberately divert people away from liberating paths of real knowledge that lead to fruitful inventions that support nature as a whole, and instead push people’s minds into digital dead-ends, while secretive organizations and aerospace corps use the real science behind the scenes.

We get showtime moments like staged rocket launches. Check out this quote below about the work of Thomas Townsend Brown. Brown was a very nuts and bolts inventor of advanced propulsion systems and played a prominent role in of the Philadelphia Experiment. He was also the foremost expert on radar in the Navy and worked in the highest levels of government:

“According to Kitselman, young Thomas Brown looked to the heavens, dreamed of traveling among the stars – and pondered the means of propulsion by which that might be accomplished.

He dismissed rocket power as “a brute and awkward force,” and wondered if electricity could shrink the distance between the stars more efficiently than the controlled explosion of combustible gasses.

Such thoughts simmered as his CalTech physics class conducted experiments with an X-Ray tube.

While the rest of the class was focused on the tube itself, “Tom” observed that when a high-voltage current was applied, the cables connecting the tube to the power supply appeared to jump with snake-like convulsions.”

The fact that the mainstream science available to the public today is incomplete and filled with erred foundational principles that do not wholly reflect the nature of reality abounds in “quantum science”. How can one know that the super tiny subatomic world works differently than the macro world when they still don’t understand the macro world fully? Instead, their minds have been circumvented into this “quantum” world of confusing contradictions which they can’t even agree on among themselves.

“If you are not completely confused by quantum mechanics, you do not understand it.” —John Wheeler, American theoretical physicist who revived general relativity in the US, coined the terms “black hole” and pioneered the very destructive anti-nature nuclear fission theory

“I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics”—Richard Feynman, was a Nobel Prize-winning American theoretical physicist renowned for revolutionizing quantum electrodynamics (QED)

When there are fundamental flaws in understandings—such as erred beliefs regarding reciprocal processes, chemical elements, and the real role that thermodynamics really plays—the conclusions drawn will also be flawed . Many scientists today who push quantum narratives have very one-sided views and are basing their “discoveries” on shaky foundations that do not hold up when put to the light.

If only scientists today took more time to consider Natural Law and it’s many applications—since that was what Nikola Tesla used to make his inventions. I did find one award winning physicist, Louis A. Del Monte, who bravely brought Natural Law into the world of “quantum science” in an article written back in 2013.

Since “quantum science” is so convoluted and deceptive; with fictitious concepts that have no real basis, it can only provide a mix of truth and falsities, and lacks real coherence. So when one does actually have the intellectual fortitude to bring the truthful higher understandings to the forefront, as Del Monte has done, we get a much clearer pictures of where the distortions lay. He gets to the root of it:

“In our everyday world, the macro level, we generally use Einstein’s special or general relativity to describe the behavior of reality. Thus, it appears we need two separate set of “laws” to describe reality, one for the quantum level and one for the macro level. In addition, quantum mechanics is incompatible with general relativity. This suggests that quantum mechanics may not apply at the macro level. However, in 2010, an important experiment suggested that quantum mechanics is applicable to the macro level.

What happened on December 2010? Scientists at the University of Santa Barbara, United States, published a paper “Quantum mechanics applies to the motion of macroscopic objects”…

Measurements of the vibrational energy showed that the results exactly followed the predictions of the quantum mechanics. The quantum level and the macro level, given the appropriate physical circumstances, follow the same natural laws. This one experiment may have put us one step closer to a unified theory of everything, the “holy grail” of physics.”

While Del Monte has brought up some important points, his understanding here is clearly limited by the “quantum” definitions themselves. Since the “holy grail” of physics has already been discovered, this all seems like a ridiculous backpedal.

How do you think Jesus accomplished the many “miracles” we hear about today? He demonstrated the Law of Multiplication; and just as an apple seed planted in fertile soil can produce numerous apples, he transformed a few loaves of bread and fish into enough to feed the multitudes. He performed feats of “anti-gravity”(which really should be called pro-gravity) by walking on water. He used his alchemical knowledge to turn water into wine. He mastered the principles of vibration and free-energy— regenerating his entire bodily form. Many other masters of countless ages and spheres of existence have also accomplished many of these feats and more as well.

All these truths are contained in Natural Law (aka Cosmic Law and Universal Law), and when we focus more on nature and our own self-realization since we are micro reflections of the macro, our comprehension naturally blossoms. When we are trying to understand things only through computerized quantifications, we disregard our own intelligence and intuition . Wilhelm Reich recognized this clearly:

“No man-made law ever, no matter whether derived from the past or projected onto a distant, unforeseeable future, can or should ever be empowered to claim that it is greater than the Natural Law from which it stems and to which it must inevitably return in the eternal rhythm of creation and decline of all things natural.

—Wilhelm Reich

“Quantum Entanglement” VS Sympathetic Resonance & Rhythmic Exchange

Musicians—especially anyone who has experience tuning stringed instruments—understands the concept of the Law of Sympathetic Resonance. It’s existed far longer than “quantum entanglement” and is a more accurate term to use since these interconnections really are about resonance and vibration; not so much “entanglement”.

Sympathetic resonance can and does happen at a distance as well as in close proximity and is a far more realistic version of how these frequencies modulate and effect one another than the questionable computerizations involved in “quantum entanglement”.:

Sympathetic resonance is a harmonic phenomenon in which a passive vibrating body, such as a string or membrane, responds to and amplifies vibrations from an external source when their natural frequencies match or are harmonically related. This response occurs as the passive body begins to oscillate at the same frequency as the driving vibrations, leading to an increase in amplitude through repeated weak impulses from the driving source, which sustain the oscillation against damping.

A defining feature of sympathetic resonance is the absence of direct physical contact between the vibrating source and the responding body; instead, energy transfer happens indirectly through an intervening medium, such as air or a structural connection.

According to Wikipedia, “quantum entanglement” is defined as:

“Phenomenon wherein the quantum state of each particle in a group cannot be described independently of the state of the others, even when the particles are separated by a large distance. The topic of quantum entanglement is at the heart of the disparity between classical physics and quantum physics: entanglement is a primary feature of quantum mechanics not present in classical mechanics.”

The fact that all life is interconnected and inter-dependent has been apparent to many for ages upon ages now. What the proponents of “quantum science” have done is distort these ancient Truths by mixing it with falsities and giving it a new name.

“When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything else in the Universe.”

—John Muir, naturalist, author, environmental philosopher, botanist, zoologist, glaciologist, and early advocate for the preservation of wilderness in the United States

It’s baffling to see people enthralled by this topic like it’s some grand new discovery and revelation. When we take the time to look within—really think about what they’re being presented with clearly, and use our own God-given intelligence and intuition, we are much less likely to be manipulated into fanciful delusions.

Now let’s evaluate the last sentence of the Wikipedia definition above. Is this really the case? Is classical mechanics really missing the ball on this? Have other avenues of science somehow not observed these connected motions and harmonics integrated into all of our lives? I think Nikola Tesla, Walter Russell, and many others would disagree. Einstein even alluded a dawning of this understanding with his famous quote, “spooky action at a distance”:

“Every living being is an engine geared to the wheelwork of the universe. Though seemingly affected only by its immediate surrounding, the sphere of external influence extends to infinite distance.”
― Nikola Tesla

“The keystone of the entire structure of the spiritual and physical universe is Rhythmic Balanced Interchange between all opposites.”
― Walter Russell

There’s also Nikolai Kozyrez’s ideas regarding mechanics and the interconnection of all things—founded on his concept of “Causal Mechanics,” (that sounds way better and so much more realistic than “quantum mechanics”) which proposes that time is a physical energy connecting all objects and processes in the universe. German geophysicist and naturalist Alexander Von Humboldt (1769-1859), based many of his theories on the interconnectedness of the entire Cosmos:

“In considering the study of physical phenomena, not merely in its bearings on the material wants of life, but in its general influence on the intellectual advancement of mankind, we find its noblest and most important result to be a knowledge of the chain of connection, by which all natural forces are linked together, and made mutually dependent upon each other; and it is the perception of these relations that exalts our views and ennobles our enjoyments.”
― Alexander von Humboldt, COSMOS: A Sketch of the Physical Description of the Universe, Vol. 1

August Comte, a French mathematician and philosopher of science and the founder of positivism, asserted that without observing connections between phenomena, “there would be no science”. There are countless others like this who made this same assertion. Yet, “quantum scientists” today report that “quantum entanglement” is an “emergent property” .

According to an article by the The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science:

“Quantum materials behave in surprising ways because of quantum physics.”

Really? So then what are “quantum materials”?

Quantum materials is an umbrella term in condensed matter physics that encompasses all materials whose essential properties cannot be described in terms of semiclassical particles and low-level Quantum materials is an umbrella term in condensed matter physics that encompasses all materials whose essential properties cannot be described in terms of semiclassical particles and low-level quantum mechanics…

On the microscopic level, four fundamental degrees of freedom – that of charge, spin, orbit and lattice – become intertwined, resulting in complex electronic states; the concept of emergence is a common thread in the study of quantum materials. On the microscopic level, four fundamental degrees of freedom – that of charge, spin, orbit and lattice – become intertwined, resulting in complex electronic states; the concept of emergence is a common thread in the study of quantum materials.

It’s nonsense because charge, spin, orbit, and lattice exist in all materials, not just these so-called “quantum” ones. All matter is charged and discharged, and everything in creations spins in constant spiral motions—it’s the glue that holds it together . A lattice can also be called a geometric pattern or wave field—it holds the shape of the object in a particular form. Many of my previous articles here have discussed this in depth. All “quantum-science” has done is muddy the waters and add massive amounts of confusion to the already established knowledge of pure science and Natural Law.

Now we will return to the sentence above put forth by The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science which states that “quantum materials behave in surprising ways because of quantum physics”. Can you see now what a useless circular statement this is? So-called “quantum materials” exist for the same reason that all other matter exists, not because of the imposition of “quantum science”.

The The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science article goes on to say. :

“Entanglement is when one of these particles, or “spins,” mirrors another’s properties and behavior regardless of the distance between them. This research evaluated three entanglement witnesses. Of the three, quantum Fisher information (QFI) performed the best, routinely locating entanglement in complex materials. QFI also differentiated between true quantum activity and non-quantum activity that can appear quantum due to random thermal motion. In addition, the experiments confirmed that entanglement increases as temperature decreases.”

The “QFI” is a series of computed mathematical equations that supposedly factors out measurements and units; somehow determining where “quantum entanglement” is happening. It’s ridiculous and arduous since all of creation is interconnected in numerous ways that even the most advanced computers today simply do not have the power to factor. An organic system born from Natural Law would reap much greater harvests of information.

“Today’s scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality. ”
― Nikola Tesla

An article from Caltech, What is Quantum Entanglement and Why is it Important explains what they refer to as an “unbreakable co-relation between entangled particles”:

“If the researcher measures the direction of one particle’s spin and then repeats the measurement on its distant, entangled partner, that researcher will always find that the pair are correlated: if one particle’s spin is up, the other’s will be down (the spins may instead both be up or both be down, depending on how the experiment is designed, but there will always be a correlation).”

There is a much simpler and more precise way to state what this co-relation is and many individuals in an array of fields have already figured this out and did not need to concoct a supposedly “new science” in order to understand it. Since all matter is made of opposing vortices, and each element has it’s mate—one of more female characteristics and one of male—these are in constant flux. Creation is a state of perpetual motion.

“What is not yet understood is the fact that centrifugal spiral motion, in this entire universe, is expressed where pairs of centripetal pairs meet in sex union in Nature’s electric current, and begin the journey of re-giving back to the Giver of motion. If this fact had been known there would have been no “expanding universe” theory. The text books say that there is no uphill flow of energy. Centripetal motion is that uphill flow. The cyclone vortice is that uphill flow. The winding of the universal clock spring is that uphill flow. The charging of your battery, your body, and the creative process of compression, is that uphill flow. Nature creates atom units centripetally in mated pairs. She causes atom unit pairs to collide and explode. There are not any atomic systems in Nature until mated pairs meet in sex union at wave amplitudes.”

—Walter Russell, Atomic Suicide

Now let’s discuss the “random thermal motion” and temperature changes mentioned above because it’s a fallacy to assume that anything in all of the Cosmos is “random”. We live in a highly organized and organically structured system of conscious gravitation and radiation that operate according to laws of the nature.

Thought is the primary energy and vibration that emanated from God and is thus the creator of life, electrons, atoms, and all forms of energy. Thought itself is the finest vibratory energy, the speediest power among all powers.

—Paramahansa Yoganananda

Many of these laws, such as the Real Laws of Thermodynamics, are yet to be fully cognized by most scientists today. These laws play important roles in chemistry and alchemical motion:

THE REAL LAWS OF THERMODYNAMICS by Walter Russell

First Law: Cold generates energy. Heat radiates energy. Cold multiplies. It cannot be divided. Heat divides. It cannot be multiplied.

Second Law: Every reaction must be preceded by its equal action. Heat is the reaction of cold. Heat could not come into existence save for the compressive action of cold. (The law of entropy, therefore, has no place in nature.)

Third Law: Cold and heat express their opposition at angles of 90° from each other. Cold extends along axis and the axis of all bodies of creating matter where rotation is minimum, while heat expansion is maximum at equatorial planes where speed of motion is maximum.

Fourth Law: Cold compresses. Compression multiplies cold into heat. Heat expands. Expansion divides heat into cold. Cold and heat, like life and death, constitute a wave cycle. In all nature there is no effect which is not wave created, and all waves are cyclic. (Again, I repeat, that the law of entropy, and the belief that energy does not run “up-hill”, have no place in nature.)

Fifth Law: When motion begins heat begins. This entire universe is a varied measure of the heat of motion. This entire wave universe is a varied measure of heat and motion. Long low waves of low heat potential constitute the invisible light spectrum, while short high waves of high heat potential and low frequencies constitute the visible spectrum.

Sixth Law: The emergence of heating matter in motion from the static cold of space begins at the indigo-blue and blue-violet ends of the spectrum and builds up to the white centered yellow, through red and green, until the maximum heat equatorial plane is re-active at an angle of 90° from the static axis of cold.

Note: The import of the spectrum has been very much neglected in man’s cosmogony of a universe which consists of only one thing – LIGHT.

These true to nature Laws of Thermodynamics have been proven to be valid and workable through the invention and success of Walter’s Optic Dynamo Generator:

The Limits of “Quantum Computers” & Contradictions of “Quantum Mechanics”

Because computers today can only memorize and perform according to programmed algorithms, they are unable to conduct consciously creative processes, as well as many other things that nature does with ease. In addition to this, there are inherent limits to how their data processes function that do not reap the results that many have hoped for.

It seems to me that we must make a distinction between what is “objective” and what is “measurable” in discussing the question of physical reality, according to quantum mechanics. The state-vector of a system is, indeed, not measurable , in the sense that one cannot ascertain, by experiments performed on the system, precisely (up to proportionality) what the state is; but the state-vector does seem to be (again up to proportionality) a completely objective property of the system, being completely characterized by the results it must give to experiments that one might perform.

—Roger Penrose

Now we will hear from the scientists and researchers working in various fields of “quantum” study and application today. Here is a quote from a young woman who has produced several videos, sharing what she has learned about “quantum science” and why it’s really not valid:

 “If someone was to make a fully functioning quantum computer tomorrow, then at least at the moment, we wouldn’t have all that much we could do with it. I left quantum Computing in 2020 after finishing an applied math PhD in that field from Cambridge University.”

She goes onto explain how limited the algorithms currently developed really are and discusses how tricky it would be to factor an actual quantum algorithm. In addition, she talks about the the fallacies of “machine-learning”. Overall, it’s been a pretty disappointing experience for her, especially “quantum chemistry”:

“Simulating molecules is a big deal, for example, in medicine where you wanna see how a particular drug is going to interact with, for example, proteins in your body.

And so there was a lot of promise about quantum computers being able to speed up these very important chemical simulations. At the time, that seemed justified to me because quantum computers are able to do something called ground state energy estimation, and they seem to do it exponentially more quickly than a classical computer. But it turned out, there’s actually an assumption in there that kind of makes the whole thing invalid. So let me explain…”

You can watch these videos on her Youtube channel, Looking Glass Universe. In this next quote, she talks about the inconsistencies of “quantum mechanics”:

“Quantum mechanics, the way that it was taught to me in university, is wrong… and not for boring reasons like it doesn’t include gravity. I mean it contradicts itself. There are two basic rules in quantum mechanics and accepting both at face value is called the Copenhagen Interpretation. I wanna show you how glaring the inconsistency really is because once you see it, you’ll find it hard to believe that anyone thinks these two rules can coexist…

Sabine Hossenfelder is an author and theoretical physicist who researches quantum gravity. She is a Research Fellow at the Frankfurt Institute who mistakenly believes that we live in a computer simulation (see my article on The Simulation Theory here), so I’m certainly not recommending her work. However, she does make an excellent point in the short video below:

Guy Kindler is a researcher and writer, and expert in quantum computing. He has written some very influential papers which include mathematical arguments against quantum computers:

“Quantum computing is a very active and rapidly expanding field of research. Many companies and research institutes are spending a lot on this futuristic and potentially game-changing technology. Some even built toy models for a quantum computer in the lab. For instance, see IBM’s 50-qubit quantum computer.

However, some scientists are not that optimistic when it comes to the predicted potential advantages of quantum computers in comparison with the classical ones. They believe there are theoretical obstacles and fundamental limitations that significantly reduce the efficiency of quantum computing.

One mathematical argument against quantum computing (and the only one that I am aware of) is based on the Gil Kalai’s idea concerning the sensitivity of the quantum computation process to noise, which he believes may essentially affect the computational efficiency of quantum computers.

A good reference for the current situation to start with is John Preskill’s recent paper “Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond“ NISQ stands for “Noisy Intermediate Scale Quantum” and it is a very useful notion coined by Preskill who also coined the notion of “quantum supremacy” – the ability of quantum computers to perform certain computational tasks hundreds orders of magnitude better than classical computers. The crucial theoretical and experimental issue is to understand quantum devices in the NISQ regime.

As for my papers: The two mathematical theorems on which the argument against quantum computers is largely based, are from my paper Gaussian Noise Sensitivity and BosonSampling with Guy Kindler; In my ICM 2018 paper Three Puzzles on Mathematics, Computation, and Games the feasibility of quantum computers is the third puzzle (Sections 1.3, 1.4 and 4) and it is also related to the Benjamini-Kalai-Schramm notions of noise-stability and noise-sensitivity which is discussed in the second puzzle (Sections 1.2, 3). Another good source is my 2016 paper from the Notices of the AMS “The quantum computer puzzle“ and its arxive extended version.”

Conclusion: Onwards…

For true advancement of human civilization, we need real human involvement. This is how we bring the power of our Creator and all of the forces of nature into science. In other words, we are fundamental factors in this great Cosmic wheelwork—our own consciousness has a major role to play. We can not move into the next age of advancement by relying only on machines outside ourselves to learn about who we are and what are true capacities are. It is just as Jesus the Christ said, The Kingdom of Heaven is Within. When we focus there, we can attune ourselves to higher ages and live in this world, but be not of it. Amazing achievements will happen on a mass scale when planetary consciousness reaches it’s heights and internally adheres to the words of Christ and this great Truth:

“That which man sees as a star is not a vision, a picture, an image or a reflection of the star. It is the exact reproduced chemical counterpart of the star integrated as light within the observer. That which is true of the star is true of the image of the mountain, or the brook or the meadow violet. No idea of Mind is seen at a distance. The state of motion which represents the idea is reproduced as light by regenerative impact within the observer.”
― Walter Russell, The Universal One

____
https://supersonicuniversal.substack.com/p/the-contradictive-convolutions-of