Joseph P. Farrell
The Giza Death Star

There is an intriguing, and hugely suggestive, article over at Zero Hedge that was spotted by premier Gizar article-spotter, V.T., and it raises the question of weather manipulation technologies in a very stark way:

“We May Have To Evacuate Tehran”: Iranian President’s Remarks Stun Amid Water Crisis

Note the following from the article:

Coming off a very ‘hot’ geopolitical summer which saw Israel and the US attack Tehran and the Islamic Republic’s nuclear energy facilities, Iran is now facing yet another immensely threatening crisis amid historic drought: lack of water for the population of 90+ million.

Rainfall has been at record lows, causing reservoirs to be nearly empty, in an already arid Middle East climate. The situation has grown so acute that President Masoud Pezeshkian has warned that if the drought persists for another month, Tehran’s water would have to be rationed. But this appears to be happening currently, as no rain is expected for at least the next ten days.

…

The alarming statement resulted in an avalanche of criticism in Iranian media, also with former Tehran mayor Gholamhossein Karbaschi dismissing the idea as “a joke” and saying that “evacuating Tehran makes no sense at all”.

Some regional analysts and officials report an over 90% decrease in rainfall compared with last year. (Italicized emphasis added)

There are, of course, two ways to interpret this drought: (1) it is a purely natural phenomenon, or (2) it is the result of the use of weather modification technology (whether the result is intended or not).  For the sake of our high octane speculation, we once again assume the existence of such weather modification technology, Indeed, in the original 1980s patents for the High Altitude Auroral Research Project (HAARP), physicist Dr. Bernard Eastland argued in the “application of the art” portion of the patent that “heating” the ionosphere via phased array antennae could produce areas of high and low pressure, and that these could actually be steered my manipulating the interferometry resulting from the phased antennae arrays. This steerage could, in turn, affect the jet stream, and thus affect the humidity and moisture flowing into a region, or cut it off altogether. And yes, this means a basic technology currently exists as an already-deployed technology – i.e., not merely on the drawing board – that can also steer storms like hurricanes. Additionally this technology could also be used to load energy into, or extract energy from, a target weather system or region.  The mere existence and use of such technologies means something very stark and chilling, for according to Elana Freeland’s very apt observation, this means that there is no longer any such thing are purely natural weather.

The average person, of course, does not have the means nor equipment to detect whether such technologies are in fact in use in a particular region at a particular time, and even with the internet, relying on governments to be forthcoming as to when such technologies are in operation, or at what power, and for what purpose, implies that they will be completely transparent and forthcoming. (If you believe that, I have an elegant suspension bridge over the Verrazano Narrows for sale, cheap. Cash up front only.) So how does one “detect” the possible use of such a technology?  I and others have argued that one looks for possible political or economic news concerning a region that has been hit by some sort of weather disaster: the recent hurricane in Jamaica, for example, and the suddenness with which that small island nation was hit by waves of “developers” buying up property on the cheap after the disaster. The Maui fires. The Fukushima tsunami and earthquake. The Indonesian tsunami. Hurricane Katrina hitting New Orleans. The Haiti earthquake and the subsequent earthquake near Paral, Chile. And so on. Each of these instances had cases of disasters occurring within “geopolifinancial” contexts that suggests the possibility of the employment of such geoengineering technologies. It’s speculative guess work, for sure, but when one looks at them, the pattern does suggest itself.

And few would deny that there certainly is a geopolifinancial context in which a weather war – a drought war – might be employed against Iran. What’s intriguing to contemplate in this scenario of possible weather war, is that Iran is not an unsophisticated nor backward country technologically and scientifically. What it lacks in terms of ionospheric heaters like the HAARP project, it can make up for in terms of data collection and analysis. In other words, Iran is in the position to argue the case that it might be the victim of such weather warfare. It has access to the space powers of Russia and China, which would certainly have space assets able to correlate periods of ionospheric heater activity with weather patterns. Publication of such data would reveal much about the satellite capabilities of those nations, but it would also reveal much about the actual state of weather manipulation.  Accordingly, I suspect that it is only a matter of time before such cases and analyses from various countries begin to be seriously made in public forums. Indeed, it’s been long overdue, being discussed only in the abstract, and not urged on a specific case basis.

It’s that public argument of specific case bases that I strongly suspect will be the next phase of the weather war, and we might be near to entering it. Time, of course, will tell.

In the meantime, there’s another possible scenario lurking in the wings if, indeed, we do enter that phase of public allegations by specific countries of specific cases of weather war being used against them, that scenario is the third phase: the “retaliation” phase. Because while Iran does not have large ionospheric heaters, Russia, Japan, Germany and a few others do…

See you on the flip side…

(If you enjoyed today’s blog, please share it with your friends.)

____
https://gizadeathstar.com/2025/11/is-iran-the-target-of-weather-war/