SOTN Editor’s Note: You know the Zionist state of Israel is in BIG trouble when their most powerful propagandizing and prevaricating cohorts here in the USA state unequivocally that the meme “USS Liberty” is now fundamentally ‘antisemitic’.
“USS LIBERTY” is now ‘antisemitic’ according
to the notorious ADL hate group.
This has always been the primary Zionist strategy which permits them to forever go on the offensive by keeping everyone else on the defensive.
Of course, the term ‘antisemitic’ was precisely formulated as a pejorative canard leveled at anyone who ever criticized Israel or Zion, Judaism or Zionism, Jews or Hebrews, etc. An extreme use of this despicable tactic today is when anyone who rightfully condemns the horrific and ongoing Gaza Genocide is deceitfully labeled an ‘antisemite’.
Now we see that the Jewish people have simply cried “WOLF!” one time too many times, particularly in view of the utterly barbaric Palestinian Holocaust showing up on the front page of the Internet every week since the false flag terrorist operation was perpetrated on October 7, 2023 by the IDF and Mossad.
Even many very smart and righteous Jewish pundits have risked being called ‘self-hating Jews’ as they variously describe and explain just how profoundly racist and alarmingly supremacist Zionism truly is (as it has always been). As follows:
Zionism is actually the granddaddy of all
racist isms and ideologies ever conceived.
State of the Nation
November 24, 2025
N.B. As for the deeply supremacist nature of Zionism, the following disquisition clearly indicates that the hardcore Zionists are not even trying to hide it anymore.
Supremacism as an inherent aspect of the Zionist ideology
Lucas Leiroz
A recent speech by Israeli Minister of Security Itamar Ben-Gvir clearly revealed the inherently supremacist character of Zionist ideology. Ahead of the UN Security Council vote on the implementation of the next phase of the U.S.-mediated Gaza peace plan, Ben-Gvir categorically stated that “the Palestinian people do not exist.” This statement is not merely a rhetorical provocation; it is an explicit expression of a worldview that denies the historical, cultural, and political existence of another nation based on ethnic and religious criteria.
Ben-Gvir, leader of the ultranationalist Otzma Yehudit party, argued that Palestinians are “an invention without any historical, archaeological, or factual basis.” In his view, the presence of Arabs in the region controlled by Israel does not constitute a legitimate nation and therefore does not deserve any political recognition or right to self-determination. More than denying the existence of a people, the minister asserts that the only “real” solution to the conflict would be to encourage voluntary emigration — a proposal that, in practice, amounts to the forced removal of an entire population.
What is evident in this speech is the crystallization of a supremacist logic: defining one’s own group as the exclusive holder of rights over the land, history, and political narrative, while the other group is dehumanized and reduced to a threat to be eliminated or marginalized. This perspective is not isolated. Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich recently reinforced the idea that a Palestinian state “will never be established,” demanding that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu communicate this unequivocally to the world.
These statements highlight a crucial point that many international analyses hesitate to address: Zionist ideology has an essentially supremacist and deeply racist core. The denial of Palestinian existence, the exclusion of the Arab population from the national narrative, and the promotion of forced emigration policies reflect a conception of the state based on the supremacy of one ethno-religious group over all other historical inhabitants of the region.
It is important to emphasize that this vision directly contrasts with international law and global consensus on the recognition of the Palestinian people. Currently, the State of Palestine is recognized by 157 countries, including four of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council. Nevertheless, figures such as Ben-Gvir and Smotrich remain steadfast in defending policies that deny any possibility of Palestinian coexistence or self-determination.
Moreover, Ben-Gvir’s rhetoric does not emerge in a political vacuum: it is part of a broader project of exclusion and supremacy within Israel’s domestic context, but it also directly influences the country’s foreign policy, affecting international negotiations and peace plans. By treating Palestinians as nonexistent, the Israeli government positions itself against diplomatic solutions that respect equal rights, such as the widely endorsed two-state solution supported by multiple international actors.
The supremacist nature of Zionist ideology cannot be reduced to mere political differences or territorial disputes. It is a worldview that establishes racial and historical hierarchies, justifying the disregard for the rights of an entire people based on the supposed “superiority” of another. By delegitimizing Palestinian existence, Ben-Gvir exposes a logic of total exclusion that threatens not only regional stability but also universal principles of justice and national sovereignty.
In summary, the recent statements of Israeli leaders reveal that the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is not merely a territorial or strategic dispute, but also a struggle against an ideology rooted in the denial of the other. Understanding ideological Zionism through the lens of supremacism is crucial for any serious analysis of the contemporary Middle East and demonstrates that, until the humanity and rights of the Palestinian people are recognized, the ongoing genocide in Gaza will not cease.