An Israeli intimidating signal against Trump not to abandon the Zionist cause?

By Claudio Rest | VT

“I’m just a patsy!” (Lee Harvey Oswald)

Whether Kirk’s killer had been a lone wolf or a member of a far-left, woke, transgender, and anti-fascist militia, I believe it would have been very foolish of him to engrave ammunition with expressions of transgender and anti-fascist ideology inside the rifle, as this would have greatly facilitated his identification and recognition.

However, investigators found ammunition with expressions of transgender and anti-fascist ideology inside the rifle that authorities believe was used to kill Charlie Kirk.

This excessive evidence suggests the existence of a conspiracy, as do the ammunition with expressions of transgender and anti-fascist ideology and the engravings inside the rifle, which were evidently intended to mislead investigators.

Therefore, I believe, he was not murdered by those who saw him as an adversary, an ideological enemy, since the identity of the perpetrator was not as important as the instigator, who wanted to support this narrative.

A widely shared post last month by Harrison Smith, a Texan who publishes on the far-right conspiracy website Infowars, was shared widely.

“I won’t name names, but someone close to Charlie Kirk told me that Charlie thinks Israel will kill him if he turns on them,” Smith wrote on August 13.

He reiterated his position on Wednesday.

Kirk was one of the first people to join Donald Trump’s Make America Great Again movement, and over the years, he became one of the most widely listened to voices among the various patriots who marched alongside President Trump to restore the United States’ lost sovereignty.

In the United States, there is a wide variety of Protestant denominations, and many of them are very close to Judaism because they still perceive Jews as the chosen people, despite the fact that their covenant with God was broken when they rejected Christ as the Messiah and Son of God.

One might think that Charlie’s esteem for Israel might be the result of a flawed theological orientation, but recently the 31-year-old American had begun to question his support for the Jewish state and its genocidal campaign in the Middle East.

Indeed, Kirk had recently begun to consider the destabilizing role of Zionism in the Arab world.

https://www.instagram.com/biologik03/reel/DOexqEOjCxd/

Moreover Kirk had recently employed antisemitic tropes, from claims of Jewish “control” over cultural life to accusing “Jewish donors” of fueling social and political ills.

The tension between the pro-Israel label and rhetoric that echoes well-known antisemitic stereotypes has been noted by both Jews and conservative commentators.

Such as: “Jews control… universities, nonprofits, film, Hollywood, everything.”

In October 2023, Kirk claimed that Jews dominated universities, nonprofits, and Hollywood, a sweeping assertion that echoed entrenched conspiracy theories about Jewish institutional control.

Furthermore: “The primary funding mechanism for American universities… is Jewish donors.”

Kirk argued that radical or progressive cultural and political institutions were primarily funded by Jewish donors, thus reviving the myth of wealthy Jews manipulating politics and culture.

“The primary funding mechanism for radical, open-border, neoliberal, and quasi-Marxist policies of cultural institutions and nonprofits” is “Jewish donors.”

Kirk linked Jewish financial support to the spread of so-called “cultural Marxist ideas,” a narrative that has long been associated with anti-Semitic portrayals of Jews as instigators of social decay.

Finally: “Anti-Semitism is being abused to justify censorship.”

Kirk argued that accusations of anti-Semitism are increasingly being used as a weapon to limit debate.

“Once anti-Semitism becomes a value,” he said, “if there are no valid reasons to censor or even imprison someone, there will be frantic efforts to label all speech as anti-Semitic, just as the left has labeled all statements as ‘racist’ to justify silencing its opposition.

“Not only that, but this won’t work either.”

Israel is fond of using the slogan of Islamism as a bogeyman to pit Christianity against the Arab world, but in recent episodes of his podcast, Kirk had begun accusing the Jewish state of having created the monster of Islamic fundamentalism, something that was bringing him very close to the truth.

The phenomenon of radical Islam is something far from spontaneous.

It has been Raised in vitro, nurtured from its earliest cries, when Israel in the 1980s decided to finance Hamas to build a controlled opposition, perfect for Tel Aviv’s purposes.

The entire narrative of the wars in the Middle East, unleashed under the pretext of targeting those responsible for 9/11, is based on it.

Blaming the attacks on Osama bin Laden, a creature of the Langley CIA and already very ill in 2001, and on Saddam Hussein, the Iraqi leader who was as far removed from radical Islam as could be.

Under the false pretext of the war on Islamic terrorism, Israel has sown chaos against those who opposed the various Islamic cutthroats, always carefully funded by the Gulf monarchies, once very close to the Jewish state.

Today, in the new Middle Eastern geopolitics, Israel finds itself clashing with Qatar, bombed with impunity by Tel Aviv in an unprecedented gesture.

Kirk had perhaps begun to consider the destabilizing role of Zionism in the Arab world.

He had confessed to those close to him that if his support for Israel were to wane, then they would likely not hesitate to take his life, and sadly, that is what tragically happened last Wednesday.

Many posts on X came from real and influential voices, some of whom argued that Kirk’s recent comments about Jews and Israel could have made him a target.

Similar accusations spread on X in the hours following the Utah shooting, repeating a pattern that frequently occurs after major news events.

In this case, speculation was fueled by past accusations of anti-Semitism against Kirk, his recent comments linking the Mossad to the Jeffrey Epstein case, and the swift response of Israeli politicians to his death.

“The same people who called Charlie Kirk a ‘tool of the Jews’ are now saying he was murdered by the Mossad,” tweeted Eyal Yakoby, an influencer who has stood out for his criticism of anti-Semitism at his university.

“These are sick people who will exploit a tragedy to further their own demonic goals.”

“Charlie Kirk’s body isn’t even cold, and anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists are already blaming the Mossad,” tweeted pro-Israel influencer Eylon Levy.

 

In the shocking first moments of the gunshot that ended Charlie’s young life, a man, George Zinn, suddenly and strangely stepped forward and began screaming like a maniac, “Shoot me, shoot me,” so much so that many immediately assumed he was the assassin of the activist close to Donald Trump.

Zinn, however, had a different role, he was almost certainly a diversion, a smokescreen.

Doesn’t the presence of a diversion like Zinn right after Kirk assassination remind you of what happened in Dallas immediately after the JFK assassination?

His shouting distracted the crowd and the police, giving the gunman plenty of time to escape and perhaps board a private plane, which disappeared from radar for 20 minutes.

Zinn isn’t the killer, just as Tyler Robinson, alias the Manchurian Candidate, probably isn’t, but Zinn is still an interesting character who deserves careful study to identify the instigators of Kirk’s murder.

The 70-year-old Zinn turns out to be a Republican of Jewish origin, and Utah is certainly not New York State, where Jews are so abundant that the Big Apple has the largest Jewish community in the world, even larger than Tel Aviv itself.

Zinn appears to have been deeply interested in the September 11, 2001, attacks, an event heavily influenced by the Mossad and the CIA.

He was later encountered a few years later, in 2014, specifically for terrorism-related matters, following his threats to bomb the Salt Lake City Marathon, Utah’s capital.

Zinn, however, appears to have a much older criminal history, dating back to at least 1989. His criminal record includes a variety of offenses, including public nuisance, trespassing, multiple frauds, and dozens of convictions for similar offenses, including the Salt Lake City Marathon incident, which was perhaps not thoroughly investigated by local authorities.

The motives for Zinn’s terrorist threats in 2014 are unclear, and perhaps, had they been, it would have been possible to trace organizations that used the now 70-year-old Utah resident to carry out terrorist attacks. Eleven years later, this man once again finds himself in an event in which he appears to have played a significant role in allowing the killer to escape.

As soon as news of the attack broke, the usual crocodiles showed up on X and cried the usual crocodile tears.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and members of his right-wing government mourned Kirk as a friend of Israel, but that proves nothing if it’s a false lead.

Messages of “condemnation” from Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu arrived in a flash, strongly reminiscent of the Sicilian proverb according to which the first wreaths at the funeral of a murdered person are sent by the murderer himself.

https://x.com/netanyahu/status/1965853456209748082

By the way: This tweet from Netanyahu was sent at 9:02 PM; Charlie Kirk was shot at 12:20 PM Utah time (9:20 PM Israel time).

There are three possibilities: either Netanyahu is a seer. Or he was in a place with a time zone that predates Israel.

Isn’t this temporal inconsistency highly suspicious?

A similar feeling occurred after reading Laura Loomer, an American journalist of Jewish origins and a staunch Zionist, who posted an even more cryptic and intimidating tweet commenting on Kirk’s death, writing that “you could be next.”

Israel is now at war with everyone, but above all, it is at war with the United States of America.

Zionism is out of control because it is losing control of the nation it has governed for the entire last century.

There was no unimportant American institution, starting with the Federal Reserve Bank, without the Zionist and Jewish world.

The US presidents have not ruled the United States.

America was ruled by the most influential Ashkenazi financial families in New York, including the usual ubiquitous Rockefellers, the Warburgs, and the Morgans, the true masters of the FED, who have arrogated to themselves the power to create money from nothing since 1913, the year in which the American central bank was created.

If the money-printing machine was firmly in their hands, the same could be said for the all-powerful American war machine, which for the last 80 years has been used like a truncheon to strike down all those deemed a “threat” by global governance and the state of Israel.

Washington has delegated its foreign policy to Tel Aviv.

US presidents have inevitably found themselves actors, supporting actors entrusted with the foreign policy book already written by circles like the Council on Foreign Relations, the powerful Zionist lobby AIPAC, and the other “major” Zionist sect, Chabad, which came and went from the White House as it pleased.

MAGA was born as a political movement to regain the freedom the United States had lost, and the moment America decided to separate from this apparatus, war between Trump and the Zionist world was inevitable, a war that was fought from the very first moment, especially through the art of dissimulation.

Trump knows the history of the United States and, above all, he knows Jewish circles better than anyone else.

In New York, glittering skyscrapers aren’t built without dealing with the lords of the real estate and finance markets, who are overwhelmingly of Jewish origin.

If anyone understands the power of these worlds, and the circles that orchestrated Kennedy’s assassination, which Israel hated from the very beginning, it is certainly Donald Trump.

Trump also knows full well that the entire press is loyal to the Jewish state, and so it was better, from his perspective, to mask his true feelings toward Israel through tried-and-tested dissimulation.

This dissimulation manifests itself in lukewarm declarations of esteem for Tel Aviv, but in practice leads to the divorce of American foreign policy from Israeli foreign policy, leaving the Netanyahu government alone in its mad wars in the desperate pursuit of Greater Israel.

While it is true that Trump and Netanyahu have rarely attacked each other in public, except when the Israeli Prime Minister recognized Joe Biden as president despite the fraud, in private the clashes have been extremely harsh, and the latest in a series concerns Israel’s reckless attack on Qatar, an American ally, for which the American president is furious to say the least.

It seems impossible not to notice that Trump’s return and his departure from Israel coincided with an unprecedented terrorist escalation in the United States.

As soon as Trump won the election, America was swept by a violent wave of the strategy of tension that began with the New Orleans attacks carried out by Shamsud-Din Bahar Jabbar, a member of the Israeli-backed ISIS and a former soldier at Fort Bragg, where numerous mind-control programs are practiced to train assassins for suicide missions.

We have witnessed a veritable deluge of lone shooters in the last six months, all of whom appear to have been victims of the infamous MK Ultra program, and who are taking action to target, coincidentally, predominantly Christians.

There’s much talk in the press about the so-called “anti-Semitic emergency,” yet not a single synagogue has been hit by an attack, as Trump himself has pointed out.

Those targeted were the Catholics of the Annunciation Catholic School in Minneapolis, the faithful of the Wayne Church, killed immediately after the end of Israel’s war against Iran, or the 40 Christians in Congo, brutally massacred by the same ISIS, which always and only attacks Christian faithful, never Israelis, who are not even touched by these cutthroats.

There is a system that is succumbing and refuses to accept its demise.

There are ruthless killers who have no qualms about massacring innocents, not so much in the hope of turning the tide of this conflict, but rather driven by a perverse desire to kill because the game now seems lost.

Charlie Kirk is sadly the latest victim of this terror strategy.

Charlie’s killers wanted to send a clear message to Donald Trump.

____
https://vtforeignpolicy.com/2025/09/is-tyler-robinson-an-israeli-manchurian-candidate/