PAPAL IMPOSTER FRANCIS PICKED YET ANOTHER POLITICAL POPE BEFORE
DEATH AS NEW PONTIFF PRETENDER PERFIDIOUSLY OCCUPIES VATICAN
Submitted by Revisionist Historians for World Peace
SOTN Exclusive
It ought to be objectively and intuitively obvious by now to every “Vatican watcher” that the entire papal selection process of May 2025 was completely fixed right down to the number of times that black smoke rose from the chimney over the Sistine Chapel.
Surprise! Surprise! Surprise! A new Pope has been chosen after just 2 days of deliberating. But then he had already been the chosen one by Francis who stacked the deck of Cardinals to assure his Jesuit agenda would be fulfilled. It appears Prevost, aka Leo, was fast-tracked given Francis had only just appointed him Cardinal in 2023 when Francis was said to be on his ‘death bed’ right before Christmas. He wasn’t supposed to live – but he did. And Voila – Francis II.(Source: How the new Imposter Pope Leo XIV may be even worse than Papal Pretender Francis)
The pre-planned and highly organized Vatican-coordinated criminal conspiracy to select the 267th pope of the Roman Catholic Church was transparently set up by Pope Francis in collusion with his notorious gay Lavender Mafia as well as the much more clandestine Saint Gallen Mafia.
Was Pope Francis just whacked
by the Saint Gallen Mafia?!
So we can all easily see from the preceding data point that Pope Francis, actually Jorge Mario Bergoglio from Argentina, appointed 108 cardinals of the 133 who voted in this weeks conclave. Talk about a totally rigged papal electoral process!
Feud with Trump & Vance before he was elected pope
It was less than two months ago that Prevost called up his most glib arrogance and chastised JD Vance- on Twitter. Yes, the Pope TWEETS! Already entering the fray as a political Pope dedicated to climate change ad nauseam. His latest Tweeter foray is a repost chastising Bukele and Trump. I guess that’s what Pope’s do these days – they create divisions in politics and promote the sin of arrogance.
Making himself clear that like Francis, Leo is anti-Trump, Vance and every other MAGA, Prevost posted this diatribe: “JD Vance’s ‘ordo amoris’ and what the Gospel asks of all of us on immigration”. Given Prevost had not posted on Twitter since 2023, prior to his revenge posting toward JD Vance in February, I’d say he knew he was going to be chosen. Like election rigging. UGH.
JD Vance is a devout Catholic. For the Pope to publicly shame him is reprehensible and most certainly based on cruelty! How to destroy religion with a Tweet. I am sure Vance is mortified. But Leo has a history of his own sweet self. Specifically, while in Chicago where victims of abuse from two priests, dating back to 2007, said that Prevost failed to open an investigation. In 2000 Prevost allowed an Augustinian priest who had been convicted of child sexual abuse stay at the St John Friary which is near a Catholic elementary school and day care. No one advised the schools of this residency.
So our wonderfully critical Pope Leo has twice helped Priestly child sex offenders remain incognito.
In Prevost’s other post to JD Vance, he was chastising him on his immigration status.
(Source: How the new Imposter Pope Leo XIV may be even worse than Papal Pretender Francis)
Catholic Church Sex Abuse Crime Wave
It should come as no surprise that the entire Holy See and Roman Curia, together with the Magisterium and voting cardinals of the Conclave that just elected Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost as Pope Leo XIV, thoroughly vetted him before selecting him where it concerns the darkest period of the Church’s history. After all, both the endemic child sexual abuse and systemic adult sexual harassment predicament within the Catholic Church worldwide requires a massive and failproof cover-up lest the Vatican itself be bankrupted.
Yes, this immense multi-decade crime spree against the youth of the world has been revealed to a certain degree, but only the tip of the iceberg has been exposed thus far.
That’s where Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost comes in.
As the world dives into the background of Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost, now known as Pope Leo XIV, it is being revealed that he has a disturbing background of allegedly covering up for priests accused of sexually abusing children despite formerly being in charge of investigating such cases.
Pope Leo is the first American-born pontiff in the history of the Vatican, but sadly his legacy is beginning with a shroud of darkness due to his controversial connections to colleagues charged with molesting kids.
(Source: Newly-Elected Pope Leo XIV Has Dark History Of Ignoring Child Sex Abuse In Catholic Church)
Wait, there’s more—MUCH MORE—to this religious crime spree that ultimately contrived a completely fixed voting procedure and secret vetting process which guaranteed that an exceedingly political American pope, highly inimical to both the Patriot Movement and MAGA Movement, would be elected via a patently corrupted ballot.
To be continued —
Until then, the following insightful exposé should be considered required reading for all Vatican investigators and papal researchers. It expertly deconstructs and lays bare the true depth and breadth of this powerful global psyop that’s not only being run on the world’s Catholics but also upon the entire human race.
The Truth About New Pope Leo XIV
Another Chameleon Arises to Beguile the People of God
Michael Hoffman
Pope Leo XIV has already won over corporate press. Their panegyrics are ceaseless. What do the bosses of the media of mass communication know that that the public does not?
In the war of ideas, among the almost always outclassed conservative and “traditional” Catholics, there is at present a sense of hope predicated entirely on what can only be imagery: Robert Prevost chose for himself a papal name that indicates he will be a successor of the allegedly conservative pontiff Leo XIII, who has been dubbed, “A Light from Heaven.” Moreover, when the new Leo appeared at the window of the Vatican May 8 to receive the acclaim of the assembled masses in St. Peter’s Square, he was attired in traditional garb.
Among certain people image prevails over reality. What is the reality?
“He (the new pope) is a great friend of Cardinal Blase Cupich, the Archbishop of Chicago, who has been making Bergoglian (Pope Francis style ) bishops for the past two years, and who was supported before the conclave by the most determined progressives (for example, Andrea Grillo, a fiery anti-traditional liturgy activist…” (L’Abbé Claude Barthe, “Élection rapide de Robert Francis Prévost qui devient Léon XIV. Et après?)
When Leo XIV’s pal Cupich was the bishop of Spokane, Washington he surreptitiously placed Jesuit child molesters in the order’s retirement home on the campus of Gonzaga University— a hundred yards from St. Aloysius Church where young families attended. Those molesters had free access to the church and campus grounds.
In the archdiocese of Chicago which he was appointed to lead after being elevated to the rank of cardinal by Pope Francis, Cardinal Cupich imposed a complete ban on the Latin Mass. This is the new pope’s “great friend.”
The suppression of the immemorial Latin mass by Pope Francis, who is often described as humble and non-authoritarian, was actually one of the most tyrannical moves of his hyper authoritarian papacy. His crackdown is often papered over by the mainstream media.
This banned Mass entails more than a matter of language. The doctrine expressed in the old Latin rite, which is at least 1,000 years old, strongly pertains to the sacrificial dimension of Jesus on Calvary.
In the past, Catholics in Ireland and England were fined, jailed and even killed for attending it, or in the case of priests, offering it. For “Catholic” leaders to suppress it, is a grotesque betrayal of the thousands of martyrs who suffered on behalf of it. Its current popularity is largely among the young and young families. It is not a case of nostalgia or a relic primarily for the elderly.
Pope Francis with future Pope Leo XIV
Francis detested the Catholic Church as it existed for 1,400 years. Only a hater of Catholicism would persecute youthful married Catholic couples desiring to raise large families within the fold of the Mass that buttressed the Irish race and Saxon England, and sanctified Francis of Assisi, Anthony of Pauda, Dante, Richard the Lionheart, Savonarola, Theresa of Avila, Mother Cabrini, J.R.R. Tolkien, Flannery O’Connor and tens of millions more.
Those in our time who attempt to worship at the Latin Mass (Tridentine or Sarum rites) represent the one major growth area in the Church in what is otherwise a demographic desert. Francis, his partner-in-crime Cupich (and many other prelates of his ilk), have done their utmost to crush this ancient liturgy.
Francis even poked fun at Catholics who have large families, sneering at them for “breeding like rabbits.” He made Andreas Serrano, an “artist” who immersed a crucifix in a vat of urine as part of an “avant-garde exhibit,” as his guest of honor in the Vatican. This is Revelation of the Method.
Francis was a true son of the Renaissance popes and in light of their revolution, as documented here, he hewed to the new “tradition” which has existed since 1438-39 when the Greek magus Plethon lectured at the Council of Florence and impressed the assembled prelates with his illuminism. Plethon’s disciple, the banker Cosimo de’ Medici, subsequently founded the Platonic Academy which propagated Neoplatonic-Hermeticism throughout the Church.
For an agent of Neoplatonic-Heremicism like Robert Prevost to take the name Leo XIV is revealing. On the Right wing of the Church, Leo XIII, in whose footsteps Prevost is signaling he will follow, was at least to a certain extent, a chameleon, if not an outright fraud.
Leo XIII is commemorated by conservatives chiefly for two of his encyclicals: in 1884 Humanum Genus (“Human Race”) contra Freemasonry, and in 1891 Rerum Novarum (“New Things”), proscribing certain predatory financial practices. It was said that both of these solemn papal documents of the ordinary magisterium were issued with the assistance of leading Catholic scholars in the fields of economics and occult studies.
If this was the case, then no erudite “expert” on the occult engaged in a competent takedown of Freemasonry coming from the top of the Roman Church with its vaunted archives and library extending back millennia, could fail to state that the masonic lodge is Kabbalism for gentiles.
Without that key, no true understanding of the Masons can be obtained. Leo XIII’s Humanum Genus consists of more than 7,000 words. Not one of them is Kabbalah (or cabala). The papacy since the Renaissance has covertly revered the Kabbalah.
Much of what is mistaken for the wily stratagems of Niccolo Machiavelli employed by the Vatican are actually reflective of the pedagogy of Kabbalah. The Kabbalah since the late 15th century has had a protected papal status, which Leo XIII maintained and which, then as now, gullible persons took for a principled, comprehensive stand against masonic infiltration.
What is the twilight language message conveyed by Leo XIII’s Humanum Genus? Window-dressing. Image over reality. Self-censorship and obeisance to a hidden god entirely hostile to Jesus Christ and His gospel.
Rerum Novarum is another cheat on the part of Pope Leo XIII. Catholics in Europe beseeched the pontiff to use his encyclical to restore the Church’s absolute prohibition on the renting of money (“usury”) at any rate of interest, part of the Deposit of Faith which began to be undermined in 1515 by Medici Pope Leo X.
The Catholics of the late 19th century advised Leo that a philosophical critique of predatory financial arrangements without a ban on lending at interest would be an exercise in toothless semantics. In defiance of their pleas, Rerum Novarum was issued without the restoration of the command of Jesus in Luke 6:34-35. Yet it carries to this day the image of a magnificent rebuke to predatory bankers. (The details of this bamboozle are in my book, Usury in Christendom: The Mortal Sin that Was and Now is Not).
The preceding revisionist history is a truism to the top honchos of Vatican City, including, I believe, the former Robert Prevost. Therefore, choosing a name which indicates he intends to do as Leo XIII did, is a signal to those who have the eyes to see, that he will feign, chameleon-like, conservative restoration while advancing the revolution by the old tactic of “two steps forward and one back.”
Before the new pontiff’s election, S.D. Wright of LifeSite News online, published a dossier on his background. I have excerpted portions of it below. (The entire study is available here). S.D. Wright:
Prevost was born in 1955 (on September 14 to be exact, Feast of the Exaltation of the Holy Cross—Hoffman), and entered the Order of St. Augustine in 1977 (taking his solemn vows in 1981). Soon after ordination in 1982, he joined the Peruvian Mission, and began a decades-long career in Latin American ecclesial affairs. … In 2015 he was made the bishop of Chiclayo. In 2020, Francis named him as a member of the congregation of bishops, and in January 2023, he made him the Prefect of this congregation (now a dicastery). Francis made him a cardinal nine months later…indicating the trust and appreciation Francis had in Prevost…
…His position as Prefect of the Dicastery of Bishops means that, after Francis, he has been responsible for the selection and appointment of …bishops, as well as administering “problem cases.”
…Even more clarity appears when we consider the appointments and cases administered under Prevost’s tenure as Prefect. For instance, in February 2023, early in his tenure as Prefect, the Dicastery announced the Apostolic Visitation of the diocese of Fréjus-Toulon, France—ending ultimately in the departure of Bishop Dominique Rey. This becomes even clearer when we consider two contrasting cases in the U.S. First, Prevost was Prefect when the notoriously liberal Bishop Robert W. McElroy was appointed Archbishop of Washington in January 2025.
Second, Prevost was Prefect in 2023, when the Dicastery undertook a visitation of the diocese of Tyler, Texas. This ended in the Dicastery asking conservative Bishop Strickland to resign, before he was ultimately removed by Francis. In short, Prevost was the Prefect of the Dicastery which enabled the appointment of a notorious liberal to one of the most prominent positions in the U.S., and the deposition of the most prominent conservative in the U.S.
It is true that the final decisions and responsibility for all such appointments and administration lay with Francis; but once again, silence implies consent. There is no warrant for assuming that Prevost has only carried out these actions under protest or against his better judgment. In any case, continuing in his role rather than resigning, Prevost signals that he believes such appointments and decisions are at least tolerable….
What sort of bishops has Prevost been helping to appoint?
As mentioned above, The Pillar claims that “Prevost saw his task as that of identifying men who embodied Pope Francis’ ideals for bishops.”
…Prevost seriously minimizes and even dismisses the importance of doctrine and the faith. He portrays a concern for doctrinal truth as “division and polemics”:
“Divisions and polemics in the Church do not help anything. We bishops especially must accelerate this movement towards unity, towards communion in the Church. He creates a false dichotomy between doctrine and loving Christ: We are often preoccupied with teaching doctrine, the way of living our faith, but we risk forgetting that our first task is to teach what it means to know Jesus Christ and to bear witness to our closeness to the Lord.” (Pope Leo XIV as cardinal)
This is a very distorted way of framing the situation and suggests a clear agenda to minimize the importance of doctrine. First, Prevost ignores that Christ’s doctrine is how we come to know him, since we cannot have charity without faith. Second, because of this dependence, it is wrong to suggest that there is an opposition between doctrine and love. Third, there is no contemporary “preoccupation” with doctrine, at risk of overshadowing “knowing Christ.” Such a suggestion is ludicrous. In an age defined by doctrinal collapse, accelerated by his late master Francis, Prevost is engaging in gaslighting…
The Pillar also noted an uncanny association with Cardinal Blasé Cupich:
“In an unusual twist, Prevost is not the only member of the Congregation for Bishops to permit a priest accused of sexually abusing a minor to reside at the same Augustinian house in Chicago. In 2018, Cardinal Blase Cupich, also a member of the congregation, apologized for allowing a different priest accused of sexual abuse to live in the very same house, apparently, Cupich said, because of a miscommunication.
The Pillar also notes: Individuals in the Chiclayo diocese would later accuse Prevost of failing in 2022 to open an investigation into their accusations of abuse against two priests [beginning in 1997]. In March 2025, SNAP (Survivors Network of these Abused by Priests) appealed to Rome, alleging: … that under the leadership of Cardinal Prevost, the Diocese of Chiclayo did not investigate their abuse claims and misrepresented [the alleged victims’] testimony in the report …preventing an accurate assessment of the case.
…A man who has remained “discreet” during the last few years—and indeed been promoted in that time—seems unlikely to be suitable. However, the wider points discussed in this article—doctrinal deviations which become clear after a careful consideration of his role as Prefect for the Dicastery of Bishops—are both cause for alarm in themselves, and as shedding light on his silence. They indicate that Prevost is not a coward or a tactician, but a loyal son of Francis, and that he will continue the work of his master and benefactor…even if he does so in a more discreet and moderate way.
This raises grave questions about whether or not Prevost can be said to profess the Catholic faith at all, and thus whether he is a member of the Church. If he is not a member of the Church, then it is not possible for him to be validly elected as pope.
At the very least, there is serious doubt on the matter: and a man whose visible membership in the Church is itself in serious doubt can only be doubtfully elected to the papacy…the resulting doubt would not be about his popularity or policies, but about his very authority. This is why great theologians and canonists held that a doubtful pope is no pope at all.
Needless to say, these points have implications that extend beyond just Prevost, applying also to those other cardinals who have been “discreet” and “moderate” in the face of Francis’ doctrinal aberrations. It is not enough to ask whether a man is prudent, discreet, or personally sincere. The question is whether he professes the faith whole and entire, in public and without compromise. If the answer is not a clear “Yes,” then the conclusion is clear: he cannot be validly elected or accepted as pope…
The Church…needs men who take seriously the words of St. Paul to the Galatians: “But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be anathema. As we said before, so now I say again: If any one preach to you a gospel, besides that which you have received, let him be anathema.” (End quote; emphasis supplied. Read the article in its entirety here).
Copyright©2025 by Independent History and Research • www.revisionisthistory.org
____
https://michaelhoffman.substack.com/p/the-truth-about-new-pope-leo-xiv?utm
Conclusion
Robert Francis Prevost appears to have been born and bred within an intensely Catholic culture and Augustinian society to carry out a major planetary mission. His entire religious background and personal pedigree reflect an individual who was CHOSEN at birth to accomplish a crucial New World Order task.
In light of the reality that the Vatican has been ruled by the Khazarian Cabal practically forever (that’s why the pope wears a zucchetto skullcap which is really a Hebrew yarmulka or kippah), it appears that Prevost has been methodically mind-controlled and socially engineered since the very day he took birth.
Which is exactly why his hidden Khazarian masters installed an American in the papacy during this raging Second American Revolution. Clearly his Freemasonic/Talmudic handlers will use him to carry out the religious Great Reset in ways that only he could achieve.
Just as Pope Francis was deliberately named to deceive the masses, Pope Leo was also meticulously branded to sell the NWO goods to the faithful masses.
Revisionist Historians for World Peace
State of the Nation
May 10, 2025
SOTN Editor’s Note:
The following personal testimony was sent to SOTN by a long-time reader who is also an ordained minister who possesses a Doctorate in Ministry.
I was once a novice at a major Roman Catholic seminary in upstate New York in the mid 1980s. I quickly saw that the seminary-directed priestly formation was not really a spiritual process nor a religious one; rather, it was a surreptitious political exercise in recruiting and training ‘soldiers in Christ’. Various orders within the Church such as the Society of Jesus take this highly deceitful malformation one step further by making hardcore missionaries out of their novices who will spread “the Word” by any means possible. In point of fact, not only is the top Jesuit in the chain of command called the “Jesuit General” (who is also known as the Black Pope), most of his direct reports are known worldwide as “God’s diplomats”.
Back to my novitiate days at the seminary: it became clear from the outset that the institution of the Roman Catholic Church was first and foremost a highly aggressive political organization and, therefore, a very serious fund-raising machine. And, that one of the primary cash cows consists of all the Catholic Charities nationwide and the peripheral operations which feed off illegal immigration throughout the USA. Without getting into the well concealed criminal conspiratorial plot concerning the egregious pederasty, human trafficking and organ trafficking, the enormous amount of funding that the Vatican receives each and every year from the US government, as well as from various supposedly philanthropic Public-Private Partnerships, is quite staggering. Which is why the nakedly political Pope Francis shamelessly spoke more often in favor of flooding the U.S. with illegal aliens than about any other issue.
Similarly, Pope Leo XIV made the centerpiece of his ministry in Chicago (by far the most corrupt city in America as well as the primary communist training ground for cultural marxists like Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton) setting up the organizational infrastructure for receiving and managing illegal alines as quickly and efficiently as possible. After all, each illegal is not only a potential ‘soldier in Christ’ as they become both a liberal Catholic and loyal Democrat, many also become real soldiers for the U.S. Armed Forces which has been desperately lacking fighting men for the many Christian crusades against the Muslim infidels (and Orthodoxy heretics) across the planet since the draft was ended. Now the reader understands why both Pope Francis and Pope Leo made the zealous promotion of illegal immigration their signature issue, even at the risk of being perceived as being “perfidious political pontiffs”.