{"id":86719,"date":"2026-11-08T06:33:45","date_gmt":"2026-11-08T11:33:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/?p=86719"},"modified":"2026-11-08T06:34:45","modified_gmt":"2026-11-08T11:34:45","slug":"86719","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/?p=86719","title":{"rendered":"

Here’s how the Republicans can prevent the 120th U.S. Congress from being seated<\/b><\/h2>"},"content":{"rendered":"

If Democrats win Congress, could the GOP refuse to seat them?<\/em><\/h1>\n

<\/p>\n

The possibility sounds far-fetched, but the same could be said of lawmakers challenging the Electoral College results that confirmed Joe Biden’s victory in 2021.<\/h3>\n
\"Then-Vice<\/div>\n
Then-Vice President Mike Pence, top left, and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D, Calif.) top right, preside over a joint session of Congress convened to certify the Electoral College votes in November’s election, at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Pence was pressured by the President Donald Trump to refuse to certify the results of the 2020 election.<\/span>Read more<\/a><\/span>Erin Schaff \/ The New York Times \/ New York Times<\/span><\/h5>\n

by Michael Gold, New York Times<\/p>\n

WASHINGTON \u2014 President Donald Trump\u2019s unfounded claims of large-scale voter fraud have Democrats bracing for what they worry could be substantial interference by the federal government in the midterm elections.<\/p>\n

But with polls showing that Democrats are likely to win control of the House, some lawmakers and commentators have turned their attention to a different scenario that could unfold after the voting: Republicans in Congress, egged on by Trump, could try to block them from assuming the majority by refusing to seat elected Democrats.<\/p>\n

The possibility sounds far-fetched and is regarded by many legal scholars as a vanishingly remote one.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt requires a lot of ducks to be in a row that I don\u2019t think would be in a row,\u201d said Brian C. Kalt, a law professor at Michigan State University.<\/p>\n

But the same might have been said in 2020 of the possibility that Republican lawmakers, under pressure from Trump, would challenge the Electoral College results that confirmed Joe Biden\u2019s victory. That is precisely what a majority of Republicans voted to do on Jan. 6, 2021, an effort in which Rep. Mike Johnson, who has since become speaker, played a major role.<\/p>\n

That is among the reasons that two moderate House members, one from each party, have asked their colleagues to pledge to accept certified election results and block efforts to refuse or delay seating winners.<\/p>\n

Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., the minority leader, said this month that his party was \u201cpreparing for all eventualities, including making sure that the results of the American people that emerge from the Nov. 3 general election are brought to life on Jan. 3 in the new Congress.\u201d<\/p>\n

That is the day that the next Congress is scheduled to convene. Here\u2019s a closer look at what could happen.<\/p>\n

State officials could contest election results<\/p>\n

The Constitution gives states the authority to administer their elections, and each one sends certificates of election verifying the winners to the House and Senate.<\/p>\n

For decades, those certifications were part of a largely routine process, but since the 2020 election, a small number of state officials have voted against certifying elections or threatened to refuse to do so. Those efforts have been unsuccessful but at times have required other officials and courts to intervene.<\/p>\n

Some federal election experts believe that this could be the greatest pressure point for efforts to reverse or sow doubt about the midterm election results. Democrats have said they are concerned that Trump has promoted false claims about election integrity to lay the groundwork for challenges to the counting, canvassing and certification of ballots.<\/p>\n

If races are not certified, seats could remain unfilled when the new Congress first meets, which could affect the balance of power in the House. In 2021, a seat in upstate New York was left vacant for more than a month as an election dispute played out in court.<\/p>\n

A congressional changing of the guard could leave room for disputes<\/p>\n

Because every House seat is up for election every two years, newly elected representatives must be sworn in at the start of the new Congress. The outgoing House of Representatives \u2014 and the majority in control of it \u2014 ceases to exist at noon on Jan. 3, and the chamber has to reconstitute itself.<\/p>\n

In the interim, while nobody is in charge, federal law gives the clerk of the House, the chamber\u2019s chief administrative official who is chosen by the speaker and then elected, the duty of assembling the list of new members. The statute directs the clerk to include only people \u201cwhose credentials show that they were regularly elected in accordance\u201d with state and federal law.<\/p>\n

The current clerk is Kevin F. McCumber.<\/p>\n

Most election law experts believe this is essentially a bookkeeping task in which the clerk is required to recognize valid certificates of election that have been sent by the states. Kalt said that clerks traditionally make sure that \u201cthe paperwork is right\u201d but do not evaluate how an election was called or conducted.<\/p>\n

\u201cThere\u2019s not a lot of judgment happening here,\u201d he said. \u201cThey\u2019re just saying, \u2018OK, the rules were followed. This person was elected. This person is on the roll of the members-elect.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n

But some commentators have speculated that Republicans could seek to intervene by pressuring the clerk to refuse to recognize Democratic winners \u2014 as Trump leaned on Vice President Mike Pence to do in 2021 \u2014 or seek to replace him with someone who would.<\/p>\n

Such an action would likely prompt legal challenges, and many election law experts believe the courts would intervene.<\/p>\n

But some Democrats note that Johnson has in the past resorted to extraordinary measures to bar a member of their party from being seated in the House, as he did when he delayed for nearly two months last year before swearing in Rep. Adelita Grijalva of Arizona. (Johnson said he had done so because the House was not in session, though there is no rule barring the seating of a member during such a period.)<\/p>\n

The House adjudicates its own election disputes<\/p>\n

While states control their elections, the Constitution also says that each house of Congress \u201cshall be the judge of the elections, returns and qualifications of its own members.\u201d<\/p>\n

The new Congress \u2014 not the outgoing one \u2014 is responsible for settling contested races.<\/p>\n

The House has faced hundreds of contested elections over its history, and Congress passed a law in the 1960s, the Federal Contested Elections Act, that establishes a procedure for doing so. (The law does not address the Senate.)<\/p>\n

After a winner has been declared, the losing candidate has 30 days to contest the result with the House clerk. The burden is on challengers to prove that the results \u201centitle\u201d them to the seat.<\/p>\n

The House Administration Committee adjudicates contested elections. It can conduct an investigation and make a recommendation to the full House on which candidate to swear in.<\/p>\n

Derek T. Muller, a law professor at the University of Notre Dame, said that members whose elections were certified had often been seated provisionally while their contests were being adjudicated.<\/p>\n

\u201cIf somebody shows up to Congress with a certificate saying, \u2018I am the member who\u2019s been elected from this district,\u2019 they still get seated,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

In 2021, Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks, R-Iowa, came to the Capitol after a recount showed she had won her race by just six votes. The Democratic candidate, Rita Hart, had filed a contest, but Miller-Meeks was allowed to take her seat while the committee investigated. Ultimately, Hart withdrew her challenge.<\/p>\n

Any lawmaker can object to election results<\/p>\n

There\u2019s another way that elections can be challenged in the House. After a speaker is selected and sworn in, any member-elect can challenge the right of another representative-elect to be sworn in<\/p>\n

Under the House\u2019s precedents, the person being challenged is asked to step aside while the rest of the members take their oaths of office. After that, the lawmakers vote on whether to swear in those who were asked to step aside, or they can refer the question of seating them for investigation to the Administration Committee.<\/p>\n

This avenue has been used less frequently since the Federal Contested Elections Act was enacted. But in 2021, Rep.-elect Chip Roy, R-Texas, challenged the seating of 67 members-elect from the battleground states where Trump focused his false claims of voter fraud in the 2020 election.<\/p>\n

Roy, who later voted against Trump\u2019s efforts to overturn his election loss, appeared to be trying to make a point by arguing that Republicans who questioned the presidential results should be willing to lodge similar objections in House races in the same states.<\/p>\n

But Democrats immediately brought a vote on whether to swear in the 67 members-elect, and it passed overwhelmingly, with just two Republicans, neither of them Roy, opposing it.<\/p>\n

Notably, the disputed members-elect from those six states were allowed to vote on whether they could be seated.<\/p>\n

The last time the House refused on the first day of a new Congress to seat a member whose victory was certified was in 1985.<\/p>\n

Democrats \u2014 who already held a large majority \u2014 objected to seating a Republican from a hotly contested district in Indiana, citing issues with vote counting and the certification process that they contended needed to be investigated.<\/p>\n

Voting mostly along partisan lines, the House left the seat vacant and referred the issue to the administration panel. A task force led by Democrats oversaw its own recount and after four months concluded that the Democratic candidate had won by just four votes. The House gave him the seat.<\/p>\n

Things are murkier in the Senate<\/p>\n

In the Senate, where only a third of senators are up for election every two years, federal law requires states to send certificates of election to the vice president, who is the president of the Senate.<\/p>\n

Unlike in the House, no federal statute governs how the list of new senators is compiled. The Senate\u2019s rules put the secretary of the Senate in charge of compiling the certificates of election, but they do not make clear whether and on what grounds the secretary or vice president can reject them.<\/p>\n

The Senate has dealt less frequently with election disputes in recent history, in part because statewide elections tend to have larger voting margins. It has fewer established procedures and has tended to operate on precedents when considering contested elections.<\/p>\n

As in the House, the new Senate adjudicates election disputes, and challenges are usually referred to the Rules Committee while the senator-elect in question is seated \u201cwithout prejudice.\u201d If the investigation finds in favor of the challenger, the seated senator could then be removed from the Senate by a simple majority vote rather than the two-thirds majority typically required to expel a senator.<\/p>\n

In 1997, the Senate provisionally seated Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., while the Rules Committee investigated accusations of voter fraud in her state. After months of investigating, the committee found in her favor.<\/p>\n

Election disputes have led to lengthy Senate vacancies<\/p>\n

The Senate has also left seats vacant while election disputes were being fought. Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., was not sworn in until more than eight months after his 2008 election, following a long recount and court battle.<\/p>\n

But a Senate race in New Hampshire in 1974 made Franken\u2019s path look easy. In the Election Day vote, the Republican, Louis C. Wyman, won by 355 votes. After a recount, the Democrat, John A. Durkin, was ahead by 10. After another recount, Wyman was ahead by two votes and was certified the winner.<\/p>\n

Durkin asked the Senate to review the election, but the Rules Committee deadlocked and asked the full Senate to vote.<\/p>\n

Instead, the Senate sent the disputed election back to the panel, which spent months reviewing 3,500 disputed ballots that it had shipped from New Hampshire. Still, senators were deadlocked on several issues that would have swayed the outcome, so the committee sent the full Senate a list of 35 disputes.<\/p>\n

After six weeks of debate, senators had resolved just one of them. With lawmakers set to leave for their August recess and no clear end in sight, Wyman and Durkin agreed to a new election, and the Senate declared the seat vacant.<\/p>\n

Durkin ultimately won.<\/p>\n

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.<\/p>\n

Michael Gold, New York Times<\/p>\n

____
\nhttps:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2026\/10\/20\/us\/politics\/democrats-republicans-congress-midterm-elections.html<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

If Democrats win Congress, could the GOP refuse to seat them?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-86719","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/86719","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=86719"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/86719\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":86726,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/86719\/revisions\/86726"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=86719"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=86719"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=86719"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}