{"id":79237,"date":"2026-09-03T08:48:57","date_gmt":"2026-09-03T12:48:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/?p=79237"},"modified":"2026-09-03T09:02:35","modified_gmt":"2026-09-03T13:02:35","slug":"waning-super-psyop-in-progress","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/?p=79237","title":{"rendered":"

WARNING!!! YET ANOTHER CULTURAL MARXIST SUPER PSYOP IN PROGRESS<\/span><\/b><\/h1>"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"

Lindsay Clancy<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

SOTN<\/a> Editor’s Note: Just take a close look at the preceding photo.\u00a0 Does that look like a former mother who tragically strangled her 3 young children to death?!\u00a0 Well, that is a photograph of Lindsay Clancy during her mistrial in Massachusetts who was\/is on trial for doing just that.<\/p>\n

Honestly, this meticulously planned psyop is right out of the inconceivably malevolent Cultural Marxism<\/strong><\/em> playbook.\u00a0 Talk about putting their CM agenda to irreparably tear the fabric of American society on steroids!\u00a0 WOW!!!<\/p>\n

Lindsay Clancy Trial Psyop Just Got Crazier
\n… … …By Highly Purposeful Design<\/b><\/a><\/h2>\n

First, it’s critical to correctly understand that there are two very valid sides to this story, which is what makes it such a powerful psyop, both culturally and societally.<\/p>\n

\n

KEY POINT:<\/strong> This is why we’re not taking sides: WATCH: Tom Cruise & Matt Lauer have intense debate LIVE about Big Pharma\u2019s antidepressants prescribed for postpartum depression<\/a><\/strong>.\u00a0 In other words, because of the unique genetic blueprint and biochemical makeup of some women, the regular use of those powerful psychotropic pharmaceutical drugs — now routinely prescribed for postpartum depression — can push them into a very negative space where they could do unconsciously anything, anywhere, anytime.\u00a0 Which means that Big Pharma + Big Medical = Crime Duo.<\/p>\n

\n

So we’re not taking sides here, just showing the extraordinary dexterity by which the cultural marxists are able to (i) first engineer a highly dramatic event and then (ii) use both perspectives to completely divide and conquer the American people by gender, as well as within each of the TWO genders.\u00a0 As follows:<\/p>\n

Female TikTok Psychosis:
\nThe Lindsay Clancy Cult<\/b><\/a><\/h2>\n

Now read this excerpt to comprehend the insane planning of this perfidious psyop:<\/p>\n

\u201cJust a quick one on the Clancy trial. I think it\u2019s another energy harvesting psyop and it\u2019s working because it\u2019s keeping the normies entertained and arguing. It\u2019s almost identical to a\u00a0case in Ireland<\/a>\u00a0from 2020. A mother of 3, also a paediatric nurse strangled her 3 kids while her husband was at work. He showed up just as it was all over and acted very strangely ever since \u2013 courting the media and organising fund raisers within days.<\/em><\/p>\n

She was found not guilty by reason of insanity as she had postpartum, was on a cocktail of SSRI\u2019s and had visited a hospital a week earlier and wasn\u2019t admitted. Exact same story.<\/em><\/p>\n

Both incidents happened on the same date<\/strong>: Morley: 24th Jan 2020 Clancy: 24th Jan 2023. Both women were nurses. Both husbands seem suspicious. Both countries divided on who\u2019s to blame. Both sets of kids were 2 boys and 1 girl and had the same initials: Morley: Conor, Darragh and Carla (CDC) Clancy: Cora, Dawson and Callan (CDC).<\/em>\u201c
\n(Source: BE AWARE! The Lindsay Clancy story is a HUGE psyop.<\/a><\/b>)<\/p>\n

Look it, we can go on and on and on about the many damning granular details of this complex psychological operation; however, that’s not our purpose here.\u00a0 Rather, the goal is to inform folks about this ongoing op so that they don’t lose a moment getting caught up in the Hegelian Dialectic<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Right knowledge can be very empowering, and quite liberating especially from the MATRIX emerging all around US.<\/p>\n

State of the Nation<\/a>
\nSeptember 3, 2026<\/p>\n

N.B. Now read the insightful expos\u00e9 that follows.<\/p>\n

\n

Lindsay Clancy is a psyop<\/h1>\n

Miri AF
\nMiri\u2019s Massive Missives<\/p>\n

\u201cOh no, here you go again<\/em>!\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cNot everything\u2019s fake, you know<\/em>!\u201d<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

Miri\u2019s Massive Missives is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\u201cHave some respect for the family<\/em>!\u201d<\/p>\n

These are the usual rejoinders one receives when questioning the veracity of certain media events, and the overall purpose of these reactions is to shift the discussion further into irrational emotional territory, and away from pragmatic analysis.<\/p>\n

\u201cHow can you be pragmatic, you monster!? Children have just died<\/em>!!\u201d<\/p>\n

And so on and so forth.<\/p>\n

The most emotively manipulative scenario possible – and thereby, the most likely to shut down people\u2019s rational minds and keep them firmly rooted in inflamed emotion – is child death. That\u2019s precisely why we have to be ultra-sceptical and analytical whenever there\u2019s a media circus surrounding high-profile alleged child deaths.<\/p>\n

In the unlikely event you were unaware of the\u00a0Lindsay Clancy story<\/a>, it regards the 2023 case of American mother Clancy strangling to death her three children – five-year-old Cora, three-year-old Dawson, and eight-month-old\u00a0<\/strong>Callan. She then attempted suicide by cutting her wrists and neck and jumping from a second-story window, sustaining injuries that left her paralysed from the waist down. Clancy said she had heard an auditory hallucination ordering her to commit the acts and felt an irresistible urge to comply.<\/p>\n

The case went to trial in July this year, with the prosecution arguing that Clancy made a deliberate and calculated decision to kill the children, whereas the defence has contested that Clancy was suffering from postpartum psychosis, and not in control of her actions. After a five-week trial, the jury are now\u00a0deliberating their verdict<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The case has attracted enormous attention worldwide, both on mainstream and social media, as people argue ferociously over whether Clancy was responsible for her actions, or not guilty by way of insanity – the effects of postpartum depression, and the cocktail of psychoactive medication she was taking to manage it.<\/p>\n

The support for Clancy is primarily coming from women, who sympathise with her mental health conditions and the alleged mismanagement of them by the medical industry.<\/p>\n

The\u00a0New York Times<\/a><\/em>\u00a0reports:<\/p>\n

\u201cHundreds have shown up outside the courthouse in Plymouth, Mass., to rally for Clancy, a former labor and delivery nurse whose psychiatric care was so uncoordinated, the defense maintains, that doctors subjected her to \u201chorrific overmedication,\u201d leading to dangerous auditory hallucinations. \u201cAny one of us who have dealt with mental health, anxiety, depression, postpartum \u2014 I think we just know that any one of us could be sitting in her chair,\u201d\u00a0Renee Kimball<\/a>, the lead organizer of the rally, told a local news outlet.<\/em>\u201c<\/p>\n

It continues:<\/p>\n

\u201cOnline a kind of consensus certainty quickly emerged around the notion of Clancy\u2019s victimization. Any serious reckoning with the central brutality \u2014 that Clancy strangled her daughter Cora, 5, and sons Dawson, 3, and Callen, 8 months, with exercise bands in their basement \u2014 has been subordinated to the compassion for her underlying anguish. In some corners of TikTok and Instagram, where charitable feeling for Clancy is at a high pitch, unhinged conspiracy theories \u2014 born perhaps of the challenge in believing that a mother could do such a thing \u2014 suggest that maybe it was someone else behind the killings, even if Clancy has admitted to them.<\/em><\/p>\n

On Etsy, there are at least 25 different kinds of pro-Clancy T-shirts available for sale. (\u201cTeam Lindsay!\u201d reads one.)<\/em>\u201c<\/p>\n

This is important context to consider when we analyse why such a psychological operation might be enacted on the world stage, but first, for your perusal and consideration, I submit the evidence that this is, indeed, a psychological operation – a psyop.<\/p>\n

Owen Benjamin<\/a>\u00a0presented a very compelling case, when he said:<\/p>\n

\u201cJust a quick one on the Clancy trial. I think it\u2019s another energy harvesting psyop and it\u2019s working because it\u2019s keeping the normies entertained and arguing. It\u2019s almost identical to a\u00a0case in Ireland<\/a>\u00a0from 2020. A mother of 3, also a paediatric nurse strangled her 3 kids while her husband was at work. He showed up just as it was all over and acted very strangely ever since – courting the media and organising fund raisers within days.<\/em><\/p>\n

She was found not guilty by reason of insanity as she had postpartum, was on a cocktail of SSRI\u2019s and had visited a hospital a week earlier and wasn\u2019t admitted. Exact same story.<\/em><\/p>\n

Both incidents happened on the same date<\/strong>: Morley: 24th Jan 2020 Clancy: 24th Jan 2023. Both women were nurses. Both husbands seem suspicious. Both countries divided on who\u2019s to blame. Both sets of kids were 2 boys and 1 girl and had the same initials: Morley: Conor, Darragh and Carla (CDC) Clancy: Cora, Dawson and Callan (CDC).<\/em>\u201c<\/p>\n

What are the odds, huh? Of course, with the double C children\u2019s names, we have our 33, but we also have it with Lindsay Clancy. Using the code that A = 1, B = 2 and so on, and factoring in that in numerology, you add numbers together to get to a single digit, L = 12, 1+2 = 3, so LC = 33 – and these are initials we are already very familiar with from other high-profile operations, such as\u00a0Lucy Connolly<\/a>.<\/p>\n

In addition, as detailed in Francis O\u2019Neill\u2019s exploration of Tom Moran\u2019s\u00a0the Devil\u2019s Hour<\/a>\u00a0– a series explicitly focused on the significance of the number 33 – the protagonist is named Lucy Chambers – LC. So we can reasonably make a case at this point that the initials LC in a high-profile media production, are significant.<\/p>\n

Further contributing to the evidence of the Clancy case being contrived, the researcher known on X as \u2018Morgan\u2019\u00a0observed<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\u201cAt this point, the Lindsay Clancy case reads like a psyop to me. Watching the trial only deepened my suspicion. The evidence, testimony, Patrick\u2019s behaviour, both fundraising networks, the nonprofit that followed and the institutional interests surrounding postpartum mental health have left me questioning the story at its most basic level.\u00a0I\u2019m not even convinced the children existed in the first place.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

That is how little confidence I now have in what has been presented. I question Lindsay\u2019s identity, the marriage as presented, the timeline involving Patrick\u2019s current wife and whether the people surrounding this case have relationships and affiliations the public hasn\u2019t been told about.<\/em><\/p>\n

Then ask what this narrative produces. And how many people are involved with ties to the following- \u279f More psychiatric screening and surveillance of mothers \u279f More medication and specialized maternal mental health infrastructure \u279f More nonprofit and research funding \u279f More institutional authority to intervene in families \u279f A cultural image of postpartum women as unstable and potentially dangerous.<\/em><\/p>\n

Zoom out further and the social effect is division. Men distrust women. Women distrust men. Marriage becomes undesirable. Children become liabilities. Families weaken and institutions assume more of the authority families once held themselves. Strong families create loyalty, protection and independence. Atomized people are far easier to govern.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

So I\u2019m less interested in being told what to believe and far more interested in who gets funded, who gains authority, what policies follow and how many supposedly unrelated players ultimately benefit. Because this story has holes.<\/em>\u201c<\/p>\n

I have emphasised the penultimate paragraph in Morgan\u2019s analysis, because, in my view, this is the central issue regarding why this psyop has been staged and what the wider purpose of it is.<\/p>\n

I am sometimes criticised in my psyop analyses for not presenting enough forensic and incontrovertible \u201cevidence\u201d that an event is fake, but trawling through every minor detail and obscure anomaly in a case over many weeks or months isn\u2019t my style – plenty of other people do that, and they do a stellar job, but that\u2019s not my main focus, because intrinsically evidencing that an event was fake, doesn\u2019t necessarily offer a compelling explanation for\u00a0why<\/em>\u00a0it was faked. And that\u2019s what captures my interest much more.<\/p>\n

I believe we are going to see the media present an increasing spate of cases regarding parents – mainly, although\u00a0not exclusively<\/a>, mothers – flipping and murdering their children, to serve the aims that Morgan highlights: to drive a further wedge between men and women and prevent family formation, and to begin to sow the narrative in the mass mind that children just aren\u2019t safe with parents, and would be better off raised by the state.<\/p>\n

The mass international sympathy Lindsay Clancy is receiving in the media from, primarily, women is specifically underlining this idea, as so many women are saying explicitly: \u201cthat could have been any one of us\u201d.<\/p>\n

So, that\u2019s the message the public receives – any woman could flip out at any time and murder her kids.<\/p>\n

Well, what are we going to do, just sit around and wait for that to happen?<\/p>\n

Or should we take preemptive, preventative steps?<\/p>\n

For the last sixty years, the ruling classes have been hard at work decimating families and separating parents from children. Beginning with the women\u2019s liberation movement, social engineers worked to\u00a0get women out of the home and into the workplace<\/a>\u00a0so that children could be wrested from parental authority and inducted into state indoctrination camps (schools, daycare) as soon as possible.<\/p>\n

The encroaching state overreach into family life has continued to gather pace ever since. Not content with having children from 9am-4pm every day, now many schools have state-bankrolled \u201cbreakfast clubs<\/a>\u201c and \u201cafter school clubs<\/a>\u201c, too.<\/p>\n

How long until \u201csleepover clubs\u201d and \u201cweekend clubs\u201d are added, and then the state has effectively replaced parents altogether? Indeed, a recent study showed that the average UK family spends\u00a0less than one hour a day<\/a>\u00a0together.<\/p>\n

Many cautionary tales in film and literature warn us of a future where childrearing becomes entirely a state responsibility. The novel\u00a0Brave New World<\/a><\/em>\u00a0depicts a dystopian world where parents and families don\u2019t exist, and children are raised in state-run hatcheries and conditioning centres.<\/p>\n

The film\u00a0Demolition Man<\/em>, which makes many allusions to\u00a0Brave New World<\/em>, shows us a not too distant future – the film is set in 2032 – where\u00a0pregnancy is illegal without a government license<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The article linked above is entitled: \u201cDemolition Man: An Accidental Satirical Warning from 1993<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

A\u00a0Sylvester Stallone sci-fi action film dismissed as fluff upon release proves unnervingly prescient, thirty years on.<\/em>\u201c<\/p>\n

Of course, we know now that nothing in these big-budget, star-studded productions is \u201caccidental\u201d and the makers of\u00a0Demolition Man<\/em>\u00a0knew exactly what they were doing by seeding these ideas into the public consciousness.<\/p>\n

Social engineers around the world have been committed for decades to eradicating the idea of traditional family, and transferring the raising of children to the state. To do this, they require, as ever, public approval, so they are manufacturing the public\u2019s consent for the eventual complete destruction of ordinary family life, by showing how \u201cdangerous\u201d this is to children.<\/p>\n

You can\u2019t leave children in the hands of their mothers, they might just flip out and murder them. Lindsay Clancy isn\u2019t an anomaly, look at all these women saying it could just as easily have been them.<\/em><\/p>\n

That\u2019s what we\u2019re supposed to think. The \u201csympathising mothers\u201d we\u2019re seeing all over the press will, in many cases, be crisis actors, further perpetuating this narrative, and making sure it really takes hold of the mass mind.<\/p>\n

This isn\u2019t to suggest the \u201coverwhelmed mother\u201d trope is entirely fictional, there is certainly plenty of evidence to back it up. Modern mobility trends and the decimation of the extended family and community have left many mothers feeling isolated and unsupported, leading to a surge in mental health issues.<\/p>\n

A comprehensive\u00a0study<\/a>\u00a0published in\u00a0JAMA Internal Medicine<\/em>\u00a0found that the percentage of mothers reporting \u201cexcellent\u201d mental health dropped significantly from 38.4% in 2016 to 25.8% in 2023. We can expect that number to continue to sharply decline.<\/p>\n

Additionally, the mothering resource, \u2018Momwell<\/a>\u2018, reports, \u201cIntensive mothering ideology, also called the perfect mother myth, is the prevailing set of beliefs telling moms to pour all of their time, energy, and mental space into their children, stay constantly engaged, and seek no fulfillment outside the role. Research links it to more invisible labor and worse mental health outcomes for moms, and paired with thin systemic support, it is a recipe for overwhelm<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n

Yet instead of responding to this crisis with societal restructure which is more supportive of mothers and children, the response is increasingly to pathologise mothers. We will be increasingly told that women are not merely reacting to the unnatural pressures and poor support systems of modern society, but rather, they are inherently unable to cope with the stresses of parenthood, and so the safest thing for all concerned is to take their children away – or to not let them produce them in the first place.<\/p>\n

As the\u00a0infertility crisis<\/a>\u00a0(which has been primarily induced\u00a0by the HPV vaccine<\/a>) intensifies, it is becoming more and more common that couples require outside intervention to reproduce. This clearly paves the way for a\u00a0Demolition Man<\/em>\u00a0style future where an external entity gets to decide who can reproduce, and, as per\u00a0Brave New World<\/em>, in what manner the children will be raised.<\/p>\n

So, yes, Lindsay Clancy is almost certainly a psyop, and I am indeed \u201cthinking of the families\u201d by saying so – the families that could be destroyed, or never permitted to form in the first place, if we as a society react to stories like Clancy\u2019s in the way the media is so malevolently manipulating us to do.<\/p>\n

____
\nhttps:\/\/miri.substack.com\/p\/lindsay-clancy-is-a-psyop<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-79237","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/79237","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=79237"}],"version-history":[{"count":22,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/79237\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":79280,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/79237\/revisions\/79280"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=79237"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=79237"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=79237"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}