![\"\"](\"http:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Screenshot-2026-08-25-at-7.22.34-AM.png\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
By: Sebastien Roblin<\/p>\n
Key point:<\/strong>\u00a0Tokyo needed new oil supplies to wage its war in China and the only way to get them would be to attack Washington\u2019s allies in the Pacific.<\/p>\n The day after roughly 350 Japanese warplanes came screaming down over Pearl Harbor and sank or crippled eight of the U.S. Pacific Fleet\u2019s battleships over a span of ninety minutes, Japanese newspapers published a statement by Emperor Hirohito declaring war with the United States and the United Kingdom and outlining its rationale for the attack.<\/p>\n \u201cIt has been truly unavoidable and far from Our wishes that Our Empire has been brought to cross swords with America and Britain\u2026 They have obstructed by every means Our peaceful commerce and finally resorted to a direct severance of economic relations, menacing gravely the existence of Our Empire. Patiently have We waited and long have We endured, in the hope that Our government might retrieve the situation in peace. But Our adversaries, showing not the least spirit of conciliation, have unduly delayed a settlement; and in the meantime they have intensified the economic and political pressure to compel thereby Our Empire to submission.\u201d<\/p>\n Why exactly did Japan elect to attack a country with twice the population, five times the steel production and\u00a0seventeen times the gross national income? The answer all came down to a U.S. embargo on imposed in response to Japan\u2019s brutal invasion of China.<\/p>\n The fateful collision course between the United States and Japan was set ninety years earlier when in 1853 Commodore Matthew Perry arrived in a feudal, isolationist Japan and demanded it open itself to foreign trade. In the ensuing Meiji Restoration, the Japanese Emperor seized power from the feudal shogunate and implemented a policy of rapid modernization to avoid being exploited by Western imperialists as\u00a0happened to China<\/a>\u00a0and India.<\/p>\n In practice, this meant Japan not only industrialized and modernized its armed forces, but also sought its share of colonial spoils. In 1894-95, the Japanese fleet defeated a beleaguered China, then effectively\u00a0seized and colonized<\/a>\u00a0the \u201cHermit Kingdom\u201d of Korea. Then in 1904-1905, the Imperial Japanese Navy defeated Tsarist Russia in the first major victory by an Asian country against a European power in modern times. Finally, early in World War I Japanese forces captured Germany\u2019s colonial possession in China on behalf of the Franco-British Entente alliance. Tokyo was rewarded with permanent control of those territories post-war\u2014much to the anger of the Chinese, who had also supported the Entente\u2019s war effort.<\/p>\n The Japanese military had its sights set on grabbing more Chinese territory. Using the pretext of an attack on a Japanese railroad in Mukden (modern-day Shenyang) actually staged by a nationalistic Japanese officer, Japanese troops seized Manchuria,\u00a0assaulted<\/a>\u00a0the Great Wall of China in 1933, and created the puppet state of Manchukuo. Then the absurd Marco Polo Bridge incident in 1937 was used to justify a wider Japanese invasion in 1937 that seized most of China\u2019s wealthy coastal cities.<\/p>\n Japan\u2019s civilian government was not universally supportive of the military\u2019s aggressive campaigns. However, several anti-war politicians were brazenly assassinated by Japanese officers, and the civilian government came to be completely marginalized by the military.<\/p>\n Tokyo eventually dubbed its rapidly growing empire the Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere. The Sphere was intended to rally nationalists across Asia opposing the depredations of Western imperialism. However, while the Sphere did attract some supporters such as Thai Prime Minister Plaek Phibunsongkhram, in practice the Co-Prosperity Sphere simply meant exchanging one form of foreign exploitation for another.<\/p>\n But the Japanese invasion of China caused relations with Washington to deteriorate. The United States was not entirely innocent of Asian colonialism\u2014it too profited from the increased trade enabled by the Opium Wars, deployed soldiers to suppress the Boxer Rebellion, and effectively occupied the Philippines between 1898 and 1935. However, Washington had cultivated ties with the Chinese Nationalists and was alarmed by Japan\u2019s military buildup. Moreover, America was ill-inclined towards Tokyo due to increasing reports of Japanese atrocities which included massacres such as the rape of Nanjing and the operational\u00a0testing<\/a>\u00a0of biological weapons on Chinese civilians.<\/p>\n Finally, after Japanese forces invaded French Indochina (modern Vietnam and Cambodia) in June 1941, President Roosevelt implemented a ban on iron, steel and oil exports to Japan jointly with Australia and the United Kingdom.<\/p>\n Japan\u2019s Pacific-spanning Empire\u00a0depended on oil\u2014and Japan had been importing 80 percent of it from the United States. Tokyo did have fifty-three million gallons of oil in reserve\u2014a supply which could sustain its Empire for roughly a year.<\/p>\n Japan would have to withdraw from its Empire unless it could get more oil. There\u00a0was a convenient supply of oil nearby at hand in the Dutch colonies of the East Indies. As the United Kingdom was tied down fighting Nazi Germany and the Netherlands was already occupied, Japan forces could likely use their existing oil reserve to capture the vital oil wells\u2014but with the likely consequence of drawing the United States into war.<\/p>\n Thus, Tokyo began looking into a military option to cripple the U.S. military long enough to secure the Dutch oil wells and present a defeated U.S. public with a\u00a0fait accompli.<\/p>\n Admiral Yamamoto warned Japanese militarists that he could only guarantee six months of victories\u2014but he dutifully went ahead and planned the Pearl Harbor attack, which by any conventional military standard was an extraordinary success. Japan\u2019s simultaneous invasions of the Dutch East Indies, Singapore, Burma, Hong Kong, Malaya and the Philippines likewise initially succeeded spectacularly.<\/p>\n But if the Pacific War were a board game, Japan had set up its pieces to pull off a series of killer movies early in the first few turns\u2014but was still playing with a lot fewer pieces. Moreover, the Pearl Harbor raid failed to remove the most important U.S. pieces\u2014its force of aircraft carriers, each carrying a hundred fighters and bombers that could attack targets hundreds of miles away.<\/p>\n After six months of Japanese victories, U.S. carriers sank four Japanese carriers in the Battle of Midway in June 1942\u2014and subsequently embarked on an \u201cisland hopping\u201d campaign that relentlessly dismantled the Japanese Empire over the next three years.<\/p>\n Undeniably, the U.S. oil embargo had backed Imperial Japan into a corner. The Japanese military\u2019s instincts, supported by a succession of victorious conflicts against numerically superior foes, was to strike out. Tokyo trusted in the valor and prowess of its soldiers and the incompetence of its enemies rather than deciding to back down before a superior correlation of forces.<\/p>\n It follows that diplomatic compromises between Washington and Tokyo\u00a0could have averted the Pacific War\u2014but only with the consequence of enabling Japan\u2019s brutal occupation of China, which is estimated to have caused the death of three to five million Chinese citizens.<\/p>\n S\u00e9bastien Roblin holds a master\u2019s degree in conflict resolution from Georgetown University and served as a university instructor for the Peace Corps in China. He has also worked in education, editing, and refugee resettlement in France and the United States. He currently writes on security and military history for\u00a0War Is Boring<\/a>. This first appeared in December 2018.<\/em><\/p>\n