{"id":64778,"date":"2026-05-21T15:46:27","date_gmt":"2026-05-21T19:46:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/?p=64778"},"modified":"2026-05-21T16:36:24","modified_gmt":"2026-05-21T20:36:24","slug":"both-sides-of-the-global-geopolitical-chessboard-are-played-by-the-same-overlords-as","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/?p=64778","title":{"rendered":"

Both ‘Sides’ of the Global Geopolitical Chessboard are Played by the Same Satanic Overlords as…..<\/span><\/h1>"},"content":{"rendered":"

…We the People<\/em> are Played for Fools in
\ntheir Brilliant Divide and Conquer Game.<\/h1>\n
\n

SOTN<\/a> Editor’s Note: As the reader will soon find out for themselves by reading the excellent New World Order<\/em> disquisition posted below in its entirety, there are many proofs which confirm that all of us have been played for fools since the very day we were born into this world.\u00a0 However, over the past decade or so, there are many dead giveaways that we have all been had by the utterly fake Good Guys\/Bad Guys narrative.<\/p>\n

Especially where it concerns the bogus collective known as BRICS, we have all seen the three primary powerhouses — China, Russia and India — expose themselves in ways that could not be explained away except that they are actually hardcore NWO globalist entities right to down to marrow.\u00a0 For example, China<\/strong> was the very site of the launching OPERATION COVID-19 <\/strong>as it has been the vaccination capital of the world over decades, as well as the home the the planet’s most oppressive social credit system.\u00a0 Russia<\/strong> fights a so-called ‘Special Military Operation’ in Ukraine that has seen millions of White Christian Slavic men kill millions of White Christian Slavic men with no end in sight which is perfectly in line with the NWO’s depopulation agenda.\u00a0 India<\/strong>\u2019s Prime Minster Narendra Modi not only supported but even applauded Israel during the horrific ongoing Gaza Genocide, he offered no condolences to Iran after Supreme Leader and Shiite Religious Head Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were brutally assassinated by the US-Israel terror group (and India has long received vast quantities of discounted oil from Iran).<\/p>\n

What’s the critical point?<\/p>\n

No one, BUT NO ONE, is coming to save us.\u00a0 We the People<\/em> must do the saving of ourselves first, and then of our respective countries.\u00a0 For only after a critical mass of us here in the USA reclaims our personal sovereignty can our national sovereignty be rightly restored.\u00a0 It cannot happen the other way around which means that its high time for US to live up to our “land of the free and the home of the brave”.<\/p>\n

State of the Nation<\/a>
\nMay 21, 2026<\/p>\n

\n

Fake Wars & Higher Prices: What a \u201cMultipolar World Order\u201d REALLY Means<\/h1>\n

by Kit Knightly<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

The world is changing. The once dominant imperial power of the United States is faltering, hollowed out by corruption, over-extended by hubris, eaten away by the cancers of hatred, fake nationalism and greed.<\/p>\n

Even according to its own propaganda outlets, America has\u00a0\u201cbecome the villain\u201d<\/a>, is\u00a0\u201cOfficially an Empire in Decline\u201d<\/a>, and we are witnessing its\u00a0\u201cfinal act\u201d<\/a>.<\/p>\n

And, as we await the titan\u2019s inevitable fall, the world is considering the future. Everyone is talking about the \u201cmultipolar world order\u201d just over the horizon.<\/p>\n

From\u00a0\u201cPax Americana to Pax Multipolaris\u201d<\/a><\/em>.<\/p>\n

This \u201cMultipolar World\u201d has been a political talking point for a long time, but it has been building momentum over the last few years, and noticeably accelerating since the beginning of Donald Trump\u2019s second term.<\/p>\n

Russian President Vladimir Putin has been calling for this multipolar order for years, and did so again\u00a0last week<\/a>. China\u2019s Xi Jinping\u00a0regularly does the same<\/a>, most recently during his trip to\u00a0South America in February<\/a>. North Korea\u2019s Kim Jung Il\u00a0echoed these sentiments in April<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Xi and Putin signed a joint declaration on\u00a0\u201cbuilding a multipolar world\u201d<\/a>\u00a0this morning.<\/p>\n

Two weeks ago, in a talk at Harvard University\u2019s Kennedy School of Government, former German Chancellor Olaf Scholz\u00a0called for<\/a>\u00a0\u201ca post-imperial world [and] a resilient rules-based order in a new era of multipolarity\u201d<\/em>.<\/p>\n

In a speech during his trip to China last month, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez called for\u00a0\u201cembracing a multipolar world order\u201d<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\u201cWhat is happening today is not a transfer of hegemony, but an increase in multipolarity \u2014 in both power and prosperity,\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Outside of politicians speechifying, the multipolar world order has become the main focus of the international think-tank circuit as well.<\/p>\n

\u201cMultipolarization\u201d was the main topic of the\u00a0Munich Security Conference Report<\/a>\u00a0in February 2025.<\/p>\n

In December, the Tony Blair Institute partnered with the JPMorgan Chase International Council to publish a report called\u00a0\u201cWorld Rewired: Navigating a Multi-Speed, Multipolar Order\u201d<\/a><\/em>, which concludes in the foreword (written by Blair himself and Jamie Dimon of JPMC):<\/p>\n

The world still offers enormous potential for those willing to engage constructively\u2014to build coalitions, invest in innovation, and help shape the rules of the next era rather than simply react to them.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

And then in March, the World Economic Forum published an (exceedingly dull) report titled\u00a0\u201cThe Future of Materials Systems: Cooperation Opportunities in a Multipolar World\u201d<\/a><\/em>, which uses sentences like this\u2026<\/p>\n

In a multipolar world, agile interest-based cooperation will be decisive in shaping resilient, productive and sustainable materials systems.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

That\u2019s the traditional circle in which \u201cmultipolarity\u201d is most discussed. Reports for alphabet agencies and non-profits, market predictions and risk assessments. Academic language that camouflages meaning in layers of surplus verbiage.<\/p>\n

But multipolarity is not just the pet subject of presidents and thinktanks, it is a regular talking point across the media landscape.<\/p>\n

America Can\u2019t Escape the Multipolar Order<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\u2026said Council on Foreign Relations publication\u00a0Foreign Affairs<\/a>, in December.<\/p>\n

The European Times headlines\u00a0\u201cFrom unipolarity to multipolar reality \u2013 A new world order is fast emerging\u201d<\/a><\/em>, and is rather more measured:<\/p>\n

Multipolarity itself is neither inherently dangerous nor inherently beneficial. Its ultimate impact will depend on how nations choose to exercise power, uphold international law, and cooperate in addressing common challenges.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

In an\u00a0interview with Politico<\/a>\u00a0titled\u00a0\u201cWhat the next world order looks like\u201d<\/em>, British author Rana Dasgupta says:<\/p>\n

If we\u2019re entering a multipolar world, that\u2019s not very unusual. That\u2019s the normal state of the world.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

As you can see, the potential fall of our modern Rome isn\u2019t terrifying to many of those who owe their money and position to that Empire, rather it is energizing or maybe\u00a0\u201cthe normal state of the world\u201d<\/em>.<\/p>\n

The US\/Israeli war with Iran has been blamed for and\/or credited with accelerating this long-awaited Imperial decline.<\/p>\n

Two weeks ago,\u00a0The Tehran Times<\/a>\u00a0headlines:<\/p>\n

How the Iran conflict is catalyzing a multipolar world order<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

A report from\u00a0The Middle East Council on Global Affairs<\/a>\u00a0frames the war in Iran as the US trying to stop the multipolar world from breaking free:<\/p>\n

What is unfolding in Iran is not simply a war over the regional balance of power or nuclear containment. It is an attempt to rupture the geographic core of an emerging multipolar order designed to bypass Western dominance<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace published\u00a0this<\/a>\u2026<\/p>\n

The Iran War Shows the Limits of U.S. Power \u2013 If Washington cannot adapt to the ongoing transformations of a multipolar world, its superiority will become a liability.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

In many parts of the independent media there is an almost feverish anticipation.<\/p>\n

America\u2019s Empire will fall, and a shiny multipolar new world order will rise in its place, and it\u2019s definitely going to be A Good Thing.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s the story.<\/p>\n

But that\u2019s all it is, a story.<\/p>\n

What is the \u201cmultipolar world order\u201d, really?<\/p>\n

What multipolarity really means<\/h3>\n

The cultivated image of a multipolar world \u2013 minus the quotes \u2013 is that of global cooperation between free-and-equal sovereign nations, each pursuing the interests of their people without living under the cloud of Imperial hegemony.<\/p>\n

\u201cEqual and orderly [\u2026] inclusive, universally beneficial economic globalisation\u201d<\/em>, as Xi Jinping said in a\u00a0February speech<\/a>.<\/p>\n

This was echoed, in greater depth, by Professor Wang Yiwei, who wrote a briefing titled\u00a0\u201cThe Chinese Philosophy of an Equal and Orderly Multipolar World Order\u201d<\/a><\/em>, and describing how different the world would be under Chinese leadership \u2013 or rather, non-leadership:<\/p>\n

China advocates an equal and orderly multipolar world and inclusive economic globalization. Among these, the core of an equal and orderly multipolar world is to adhere to the equality of all countries, big and small, oppose hegemonism and power politics, and effectively promote the democratization of international relations.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

A less utopian view predicts a multipolar world districted into blocs or spheres of influence, but still more dynamic and potentially fair for being out of the Empire\u2019s shadow. That was the original meaning of the phrase when it was first floated\u00a0in the late 90s<\/a>.<\/p>\n

But neither of these reflect the looming reality, or the true intentions of the powerful people feeding the word to their talking heads.<\/p>\n

That might be multipolarity, but it\u2019s not \u201cmultipolarity\u201d.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s amazing the difference a pair of quotation marks can make, isn\u2019t it?<\/p>\n

The powers-that-shouldn\u2019t-be and their soulless meat puppets in the corporate, academic and political spheres have created an entirely euphemistic linguistic phraseology defined by the need for quotation marks.<\/p>\n

Words and phrases that don\u2019t mean what they pretend to mean.<\/p>\n

\u201cClimate change\u201d, \u201chate speech\u201d, \u201cpublic health\u201d.<\/p>\n

\u201cTerrorism\u201d, \u201cmisinformation\u201d and \u201csustainability\u201d.<\/p>\n

In our political landscape, these have ceased to be words with meanings and become both camouflage and conditioning.<\/p>\n

A dishonest cross-breed of programming language and hypnotic suggestion; phrases designed to obfuscate reality on the one hand, and either mechanically call pre-programmed responses or elicit powerful conditioned emotional reactions on the other.<\/p>\n

\u201cMultipolarity\u201d is one of those words. And it should always be put in quotes.<\/p>\n

The truth behind the word is simple: A global franchise for an old system of control.<\/p>\n

Party Politics Goes Global<\/h3>\n

Defenders of the \u201cmultipolar world order\u201d narrative will often argue along the lines\u00a0\u201csurely a multipolar world is better than US Imperialism? Shouldn\u2019t we welcome resistance to hegemony?\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

That same argument has been deployed by climate change supporters, who claim\u00a0\u201ceven if the climate isn\u2019t changing, protecting the environment is still a good thing, isn\u2019t it?\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

The flaw in this argument is a failure to question the underlying assumptions and official definitions of these phrases.<\/p>\n

Just because something adopts a nice-sounding name doesn\u2019t mean that thing is nice.<\/p>\n

Labour don\u2019t support workers. The Democrats hate democracy.<\/p>\n

State-backed corporate \u201cenvironmentalism\u201d is not about planting trees or saving animals, and globalist-backed corporate \u201cmultipolarity\u201d is nothing to do with increasing national sovereignty or offering independence from a global authority.<\/p>\n

The reality of a \u201cmultipolar world\u201d will be a system of intertwining corporate and state institutions implementing authoritarian, anti-human policies and disguising an ideologically monolithic power structure behind an illusory veneer of \u201cchoice\u201d.<\/p>\n

We in the collective West are more than familiar with this model \u2013\u00a0it is the way our \u201cdemocracies\u201d function.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Two major teams, with near identical ideologies and taking orders from the same unelected powers, fiercely battling it out over the tiniest sliver of uncommon ground.<\/p>\n

They pitch electoral battles over differences of iconography, phraseology or fractions of percentage points to distract from the fact they agree about everything that really matters, have no real power at all, and are at best replaceable widgets in a vast influence machine.<\/p>\n

The point of these battles is to convince people that democracy exists, that they have a choice, and can affect change.<\/p>\n

This lie\u00a0works<\/em>, and has done for\u00a0decades<\/em>.<\/p>\n

\u201cMutlipolarity\u201d is an expansion of that model \u2013 the control mechanism of fake binary left-right, red-blue, Coke-Pepsi partisan politics rolling out world-wide.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s the same exact method employed to the same exact end: Tribalism as a path to cognitive dissonance, thought termination and the death of objectivity.<\/p>\n

Why This? Why now?<\/h3>\n

It\u2019s worth remembering this faux-antagonistic version of \u201cmultipolarity\u201d was not part of the long term plan.<\/p>\n

It was obvious, almost from the very start, that the Covid \u201cpandemic\u201d was intended to be a\u00a0great global unifying moment<\/a>.<\/p>\n

We were all supposed to realise how silly these disagreements across ethnic, national or religious lines were, and come together to beat back the common enemy. A threat to the world that untied the world, like in Independence Day.<\/p>\n

We were meant to be using digital currency under a globally implemented social credit system by now. Owning nothing and being happy.<\/p>\n

But\u00a0it didn\u2019t work<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The moment they attempted to remove the horizontal divisions created to control society, they only drew attention to the much greater vertical divisions. People suddenly became more aware of the centralized, unified nature of global power structures.<\/p>\n

The grand plan to\u00a0get Global Government<\/a> through the gates inside the Covid trojan horse not only failed, but backfired spectacularly.<\/p>\n

There was a need for a re-adjustment. A new approach.<\/p>\n

International unity didn\u2019t work and doesn\u2019t sell, but an international\u00a0binary<\/em>\u00a0might.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s the \u201cmultipolar world order\u201d.<\/p>\n

The Momentum of Real Division<\/h3>\n

None of this is to deny the existence of real divisions, or whitewash historic crimes. Obviously there are deeply felt, and entirely justified, anti-Imperial sentiments across the developing world, and within the dissenting circles of the developed world.<\/p>\n

The USA has been an Imperial power for the best part of two centuries, and a global hegemon for almost forty years, and in that time it has carried out monstrous acts of colonial aggression, and destroyed millions of lives. We have covered many of them.<\/p>\n

In pursuit of oil and gold they cut a bloody swathe across the Middle East, and churned South and Central America into political chaos over and over again.<\/p>\n

Israel likewise \u2013 whether you consider them the power behind the US throne, or Washington\u2019s catspaw in the Middle East \u2013 is a brutal apartheid state, that has torn up and spat out international law a thousand times over.<\/p>\n

These are all true facts, and the multipolar narrative finds utility in them.<\/p>\n

Just as domestic party politics parlays very real economic issues into shallow class-based resentments, or understandable concerns over uncontrolled immigration into reactionary xenophobia \u2013 so too does the \u201cmultipolar world\u201d narrative prey on historical trauma and the desire for vengeance to embed partisan thought that erodes critical thinking.<\/p>\n

The narrative harnesses the momentum of historical hatred to push itself forward.<\/p>\n

Indeed, as I have previously said in interviews, the enthusiasm for this new model from the political classes in Russia, China et al. is entirely understandable. It is far better, from their point of view, to have a seat at the globalist table than be living with Uncle Sam\u2019s nuclear gun at their temple.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s possible many of the people involved truly believe that a fake \u201cmultipolar world order\u201d really does prevent a nuclear war, and is for the best.<\/p>\n

Ironically, in their minds, \u201cwar\u201d really\u00a0does<\/em>\u00a0mean peace.<\/p>\n

The Role of War<\/h4>\n

War is vital to the development of this multipolar model, in two main ways:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. It disguises, discredits and\/or distracts from, the revelation of globalist cooperation highlighted by the Pandemic.<\/li>\n
  2. It furthers, by other means, the \u201cgreat reset\u201d agenda.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    It has other supplementary functions as well.<\/p>\n

    If \u201cMultipolarity\u201d is the global franchise of fake democracy, then war can be seen as a\u00a0replacement for the ballot box.<\/strong>. We don\u2019t have global elections (yet); so their role in the system is assumed by geopolitical struggles; trade deals or staged\/limited \u201cwars\u201d.<\/p>\n

    Global unity government was and is a very unpopular idea, so its creeping implementation has to be disguised.\u00a0Nothing disguises unity of purpose so well as armed conflict.<\/strong><\/p>\n

    The sheer number of people who repeat some variant of the argument\u00a0\u201chow can they be on the same side, they\u2019re shooting at each other!\u201d<\/em>\u00a0is testament to the effectiveness of this strategy.<\/p>\n

    Nothing\u00a0brings a populous together<\/strong>\u00a0so well as a perceived external threat. History is replete with rulers who, faced with discontent at home, started a war to garner support. A state of being at war tends to unite people behind the government.<\/p>\n

    It\u2019s the natural extension of this known tactic that two governments would agree to go to war in order to mutually benefit from this group-think dynamic.<\/p>\n

    This is international geo-political game theory, as explained in\u00a0A Beautiful Mind<\/a>. They both win if they agree not to truly compete.<\/p>\n

    Both sides have corrupt political classes, both sides have arms manufacturers keen to profit from chaos, both sides crave \u201cemergency war-time powers\u201d to crack down on domestic dissent.<\/p>\n

    So, we can see how the \u201cwar\u201d individually benefits the rulers of each side in the short term. But, more importantly, the supra-national powers have a larger, longer-term agenda (see below) that is also served by the war.<\/p>\n

    War drives up prices, consumes resources, lowers the standard of living, justifies shortages and manufacturers scarcity.<\/p>\n

    These factors combine to a make a state of being \u2013 or appearing to be \u2013 at war vital to the planned breakdown and reconstruction of society.<\/p>\n

    This is not a new idea, the state has used the framing of war, or at least the threat of war, to boost national unity and increase state powers for centuries.<\/p>\n

    The new twist is that these \u201cwars\u201d are not real, they are \u2013 to one extent or another \u2013 staged.<\/p>\n

    All the wars a stage<\/h3>\n

    We are living in the age of\u00a0the unreal<\/a>\u00a0\u2013\u00a0The Perfidious Unreality of the New Normal<\/a>\u00a0\u2013 as we discussed with all those quotation marks.<\/p>\n

    We regularly live through \u201cterrorism\u201d that is no such thing, we hold \u201celections\u201d where\u00a0the voting is irrelevant<\/a>, and we just had a worldwide \u201cpandemic\u201d\u00a0without a disease<\/a>.<\/p>\n

    It is only natural that warfare should be folded into a propaganda control system that increasingly relies on simply making stuff up.<\/p>\n

    Just as Western domestic \u201cdemocracies\u201d need \u201celections\u201d to maintain the illusion of the system, so too does a \u201cmultipolar world\u201d need \u201cwars\u201d to create the appearance of conflict.<\/p>\n

    These wars are not real.<\/p>\n

    Or perhaps \u201creal\u201d is not the best word to use \u2013 if you want we could say these wars are not\u00a0honest<\/em>, not\u00a0true<\/em>, not\u00a0sincere<\/em>.<\/p>\n

    But what does staged war mean?<\/strong><\/p>\n

    Does it mean no bombs are being dropped or people killed?<\/p>\n

    No, as we have said many times: Be it in Ukraine or Gaza or Iran, there likely is death and destruction taking place \u2013 but that does not necessarily mean war.<\/p>\n

    As Catte says in her\u00a02024 article<\/a>:<\/p>\n

    Death isn\u2019t the definition of war. Conflict is the definition of war.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    Do a few air strikes or a thousand dead civilians mean the US and Iran are really enemies locked in an ideological struggle for survival? No. Of course not.<\/p>\n

    We know these governments and agencies do not care about\u00a0their own people<\/em>, let alone\u00a0each other\u2019s<\/em>.<\/p>\n

    People were disposable when they were being nailed inside their houses, given illegal DNR orders or injected with toxic Pfizer goo, and they\u2019re just as disposable when they\u2019re being blown up.<\/p>\n

    It\u2019s like a psychopathic, murderous sport. The players are real \u2013 maybe they\u2019re playing to win or maybe paid to lose \u2013 but it doesn\u2019t really matter, since the struggle is controlled by a league which sets the terms.<\/p>\n

    Numbers, times, places, rules and limitations are all agreed on beforehand.<\/p>\n

    And, just like sport, the fans cheering hate each other far more than the players playing do, everyone gets paid no matter who wins, and the whole thing is owned by a handful of billionaires who all go to the same parties.<\/p>\n

    What would a staged war look like?<\/strong><\/p>\n

    Well, that\u2019s a more complicated question.<\/p>\n

    The simple answer is \u201ccoordination\u201d. Any kind of coordination \u2013 especially of scale or scope \u2013 means we can infer a certain amount of fakeness. After all, if the two sides can agree to have a\u00a0limited war<\/em>, they can agree\u00a0not have a war at all<\/em>.<\/p>\n

    There are a few more specific signs to look out for.<\/p>\n

    For example, both sides\u00a0calling ahead<\/a>\u00a0to tell each other where they plan to bomb (or\u00a0not bomb<\/a>), so that people can be evacuated accordingly.<\/p>\n

    Or one army making it to the enemy capital inside a month, then\u00a0turning around and leaving again<\/a>\u00a0for unknown reasons.<\/p>\n

    Or maybe pausing hostilities to carry out a\u00a0polio vaccination drive<\/a>.<\/p>\n

    Or perhaps\u00a0vague or ever-changing victory conditions<\/a>.<\/p>\n

    Or a pattern of airstrikes hitting empty or condemned buildings in such a way that\u00a0aligns with pre-existing renovation plans<\/a>.<\/p>\n

    Or repeated self-defeating or\u00a0self-sabotaging behavior<\/a>\u00a0that seems to artificially halt progress or extend the conflict.<\/p>\n

    Or sudden, contradictory developments in the narrative that\u00a0don\u2019t logically follow<\/a>.<\/p>\n

    Or apparent collaboration from combatants on strategies that\u00a0further<\/a>\u00a0a\u00a0globalist agenda<\/a>.<\/p>\n

    \u2026that kind of thing.<\/p>\n

    This is the logical extension of pre-existing\u00a0modus operandi<\/em>. The inevitable intersection of the war-for-profit model that is centuries old, and the age of simulacra\u00a0described by Baudrillard<\/a>\u00a0in the 1980s.<\/p>\n

    What is the benefit of staged war?<\/strong><\/p>\n

    The benefit of a staged war vs a real war is much the same as a fake pandemic vs a real pandemic \u2013 control.<\/p>\n

    A coordinated \u201cwar\u201d can last as long as it needs to, pause or resume on command, kill as few or as many as necessary, and can\u2019t ever accidentally result in nuclear annihilation.<\/p>\n

    George Orwell described it almost perfectly eighty years ago. Super-continents locked in eternal, and maybe even fictional, conflict. Warfare becoming \u201ca purely internal affair\u201d, not meant to be won but meant to be continuous.<\/p>\n

    An endless game and permanent chaos is how they win.<\/p>\n

    That\u2019s our state of play, grumbling wars with vague victory conditions that neither army ever loses but both sides constantly\u00a0claim to be winning<\/a>.<\/p>\n

    Meanwhile, the price of energy is only going up, we\u2019re being warned of fertilizer crises and food shortages and higher taxes.<\/p>\n

    Different Paths, Same Destination<\/h3>\n

    Just as in domestic party politics, vociferous or violent disagreements between the parties belie a shared agenda pushed by the power that controls both sides of every apparent divide.<\/p>\n

    Even as their mutually-beneficial \u201cwars\u201d play out, reports and think-tanks talk up the need for \u201climited cooperation\u201d or \u201cregional multilateral projects\u201d.<\/p>\n

    As they bash their soldiers together on one side of the world, they share technology, cooperate on environmental issues or buy gas and oil from each other.<\/p>\n

    And agree on major policy documents.<\/p>\n

    The whole world (minus the US, currently) has signed the Pandemic Treaty, or signed up to the United Nations\u00a0\u201cPact for the Future\u201d<\/a>.<\/p>\n

    The BRICS nations all have\u00a0globalist ties<\/a>\u00a0\u2013 recall BRICs was a term coined in a\u00a0Goldman Sachs report in 2001<\/a>\u00a0\u2013 and they all signed the\u00a0Kazan Declaration in 2024<\/a>. Supporting, among other things, the IMF, the WHO, Agenda 2030 and \u201csustainable development goals\u201d. (Read Riley Waggaman\u2019s great break down\u00a0here<\/a>)<\/p>\n

    The Kyoto Protocols, the\u00a0Paris Climate Agreements<\/a>, the UN\u2019s Sustainable Development Goals are all backed by every one of our multiple poles.<\/p>\n

    Everyone on any of the supposed sides believes in the same things and shills the same foundational globalist lies such as climate change and Covid.<\/p>\n

    And, quirks of implementation or nomenclature aside, they all want the same things and push the same familiar shopping list of policies:<\/p>\n