In my latest book,\u00a0The Technocratic Dark State<\/em><\/a>, I explore the influence of a powerful collective of Silicon Valley oligarchs. These oligarchs, as we shall see, have captured and now effectively control the second Trump administration. They like to go by many names: accelerationists, neoreactionaries, technocrats, the Tech-Bros, TechnoKings, CEO dictators, and more besides. We can now add \u201cPraxians\u201d into the mix. Though, personally, I prefer \u201cNeonerds.\u201d<\/p>\n The Praxians are part of a global oligarch network that is exploiting public-private partnership\u2014<\/em>stakeholder capitalism\u2014<\/em>to imprison humanity in their\u00a0digital panopticon<\/a>. The primarily US-based Silicon Valley-rooted wing of the global oligarchy\u2014<\/em>the Praxians\u2014<\/em>extends beyond what many call the\u00a0PayPal Mafia<\/a>. In addition to Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, Reid Hoffman, Alex Karp, Joe Lonsdale, and other formative PayPal\u00a0Mafiosi,<\/em>\u00a0the cast of characters propping up the current US administration, who evidently share Praxian goals, includes the likes of Mark Andreessen, Larry Ellison, Mark Zuckerberg, Sam Altman, Palmer Luckey, and others.<\/p>\n Both within the US and internationally, this gaggle of venture capitalists and technology entrepreneurs are seeking to exploit artificial intelligence (AI) and population surveillance technology\u2014what the United Nations (UN)\u00a0calls<\/a>\u00a0\u201cfrontier technology\u201d\u2014to firmly establish\u00a0Technocracy<\/a>\u00a0as a worldwide governance system. At the existing global governance level, the UN, which is a\u00a0public-private partnership<\/a>, is equally eager to roll out Technocracy.<\/p>\n One of the Silicon Valley aligned oligarchs\u2019 flagship projects is \u201cthe world\u2019s first Digital Nation\u201d of Praxis on Greenland. The Trump administration\u2019s overtures to\u00a0seize Greenland<\/a>\u00a0were no coincidence. Given the heady mix of strange new theological concepts, pseudo-philosophy and naked techno-feudal imperialism that these oligarchs seem to value, it is worth noting that the word \u201cpraxis\u201d\u00a0means<\/a>\u00a0the process of practically implementing a theory.<\/p>\n The people who support the Praxis Nation project self-identify as \u201cPraxians.\u201d The\u00a0Praxis website<\/a>\u00a0claims there are more than 151,000 Praxians in 401 cities across 82 nations whose businesses are collectively valued at more than $1.1 trillion. Perhaps there are that many, but the businesses that constitute the bulk of the claimed $1.1T total valuation are controlled by a close-knit cartel of Praxian oligarchs who are relatively small in number. It is these oligarchs who are the focus of this article and whom I specifically refer to as \u201cPraxians.\u201d<\/p>\n The Praxian social engineering toolbox comprises Technocracy combined with the implementation of ideas that spring from the\u00a0Dark Enlightenment<\/a>\u2014<\/em>for a detailed exploration of Dark Enlightenment themes see\u00a0here<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0here<\/a>. Building on the online nation building techniques outlined in Balaji Srinivasan\u2019s 2022 book the\u00a0The Network State<\/em><\/a>, the Praxians are trying to impose a network, or \u201cpatchwork,\u201d of smart-city states controlled by the private sector. The planned\u00a0redevelopment<\/a>\u00a0of Gaza is one among many Praxian projects currently underway\u2014you can read more about Praxian city state projects\u00a0here<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0here<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n The Praxians want sovereign corporations (sovcorps), led by CEO dictator \u201cTechnoKings,\u201d to provide \u201cgovernance as a service\u201d to the people who will live as \u201ccustomers\u201d of their smart city-state \u201crealms.\u201d Self identifying as \u201cneoreactionaries,\u201d one of the Praxians\u2019 leading neoreactionary gurus, Curtis Yarvin, proposes the establishment of a \u201cpatchwork of realms.\u201d\u00a0For<\/em>\u00a0example, he envisages \u201cdeterritorializing\u201d\u00a0central Europe<\/a>\u00a0into a privately controlled, but diplomatically recognised, patchwork of \u201cneostates.\u201d Described by Praxian venture capitalist Marc Andreessen as a \u201cpatron saint\u201d of neoreaction, Dark Enlightenment author Nick Land suggests that the \u201cdeterritorialization\u201d of nations would enable their subsequent \u201creterritorialization\u201d into large business enterprises run by what he called \u201cgov-corp.\u201d<\/p>\n The Praxians are selling their schemes to libertarians who have perhaps been bamboozled into supporting the oligarchs\u2019 plans by the oligarchs\u2019\u00a0propagandists<\/a>. In\u00a0The Technocratic Dark State<\/em><\/a>, I explore a persistent Praxian deceit that we might call the \u201cdecentralization-to-recentralization trick.\u201d Though rank and file Praxian admirers may hold to the libertarian principle of decentralization, the Praxians plan is to centralize\u2014reterritorialize\u2014their and their oligarch partners authority over the entire \u201cpatchwork of realms.\u201d\u00a0<\/em>Oligarchs couldn\u2019t care less about libertarianism. They value\u00a0digital dictatorship<\/a>, Technocracy, and the Dark Enlightenment and are using\u00a0accelerationism<\/em>\u00a0to achieve their goals in Gaza and elsewhere.<\/p>\n First proposed in the early 20th century, it is the technology of the 21st century that makes the global constructions of Technates\u2014<\/em>societies and jurisdictions managed through Technocracy\u2014<\/em>a realistic proposition. The Praxians have used and are using accelerationism to propel the construction of an international patchwork of nascent Technates.<\/p>\n Accelerationism is a reliable Praxian tool. It is an aggressive investment strategy in \u201cdisruptive technology.\u201d The objective is to use \u201ccreative destruction\u201d to break apart markets, socioeconomic systems, associated sociopolitical systems, and nations, in order to then reterritorialize them as a patchwork of sovcorp realms. Ultimately, to be reterritorialized under a\u00a0sovereign<\/em>\u00a0gov-corp.<\/p>\n In his 2017 post \u201cA Quick and Dirty Introduction To Accelerationism<\/a>,\u201d Nick Land wrote:<\/p>\n In this germinal accelerationist matrix, there is no distinction to be made between the destruction of capitalism and its intensification. The auto-destruction of capitalism is what capitalism is. \u201cCreative destruction\u201d is the whole of it. [. . .] Capital revolutionizes itself more thoroughly than any extrinsic \u2018revolution\u2019 possibly could.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n In part, this was Land\u2019s commentary on the accelerationist approach already adopted by the Praxians. The veneration of venture capitalism as a revolutionary force appeals greatly to transnational capitalist oligarchs who view nation-states as squares on a grand chessboard.<\/p>\n Praxian accelerationism manifests through the use of \u201cseed accelerators,\u201d often called\u00a0startup accelerators<\/a>, which differ somewhat from startup incubators. Startup accelerators provide short bursts of startup venture capital for new ventures, often incorporating mentorship, network support, and training\u2014<\/em>usually in exchange for a sizeable equity share of the startup. Incubators are longer term investments, commonly demanding less equity from the startup. By focusing their startup accelerators on fledgling companies that specialise in\u00a0disruptive technology<\/a>, the Praxians seek to abruptly and irrevocably change\u2014<\/em>and thereby guide and control\u2014technological development,<\/em>\u00a0resource distribution, manufacturing processes, financial and monetary systems, global markets, economies and, therefore, governments and nations.<\/p>\n The Praxian accelerationist investment pathway is an identifiable signature: their seed accelerators initiate \u201cdisruptive technology\u201d startups or research projects. Praxian-linked investment houses, like Sequoia Capital, Andreessen Horowitz, and Founders Fund, then increase investment in subsequent funding rounds to incubate promising creative destruction. Once the disruption is underway, if there is potential commercial value,\u00a0Initial Public Offerings<\/a>\u00a0(IPOs) frequently follow to attract wider investment. The Praxians then use their private equity funds to manage expansion further or hand-off to their oligarch partners\u2019 investment management companies, such as BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard.<\/p>\n In 2005, the Praxians\u2019 Y Combinator (YC) formed as the world\u2019s first seed accelerator. This was two years before neoreactionary\u00a0thinker<\/em>\u00a0Curtis Yarvin, a\u00a0close associate<\/a>\u00a0of Peter Thiel, started writing his\u00a0Unqualified Reservations<\/em>\u00a0blog, and seven years before Nick Land published\u00a0The Dark Enlightenment<\/em>, which was influenced by Yarvin.<\/p>\n YC is led by investors who accelerate startups, like Paradigm, in \u201cbatches,\u201d using a standardised accelerator\u00a0investment protocol<\/a>.\u00a0<\/em>YC is, in essence, a front in a Praxian investment shell game.<\/p>\n Private venture capital (VC) firms, such as\u00a0Sequoia Capital<\/a>, finance startups, like Paradigm, after initial \u201cseed\u201d investment from YC. Like all major investment houses, Sequoia Capital closely guards the identities of the individual investors they represent. Though, in Sequoia Capital\u2019s case, it is pretty obvious they include the Praxians.<\/p>\n In turn, YC-accelerated companies like Paradigm, which specialises in\u00a0investments<\/a>\u00a0in \u201ccrypto, AI, robotics, and across new frontiers,\u201d provides another degree of separation between the Praxians\u2019\u00a0angel investments<\/a>\u00a0and the projects they are actually controlling. Though the clues are there, if you look.<\/p>\n When Paradigm led a funding round for the \u201cPraxis Nation\u201d startup, the new nation\u2019s link back to YC and the Praxians\u2019 shell game was\u00a0transparent enough<\/a>:<\/p>\n Our team includes founders of publicly traded companies [and] Y Combinator execs.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Paradigm is led by\u00a0Matt Huang<\/a>, an MIT graduate and early Bitcoiner whose first startup, called Hotspot, was seed-funded by angel investors at YC.<\/p>\n The current president and CEO of YC is Garry Tan, who was initially pursued by Peter Thiel to be a co-founder of Palantir. Reportedly, the time wasn\u2019t right for Tan, but he soon joined Palantir as its\u00a0tenth employee<\/a>. Garry Tan is prominent in the ACTS 17 Collective, which seeks to introduce a peculiar model of Christianity to tech entrepreneurs and venture capitalists. We\u2019ll get to this grift, and its relevance to current events in the Middle East, in Part 2.<\/p>\n Trae Stephens is another early employee of Palantir as well as the co-founder of the defence contractor Anduril Industries and a partner in Peter Thiel\u2019s venture capital firm Founders Fund. He is another ACTS 17\u00a0crusader.<\/em>\u00a0In 2025, Peter Thiel gave a fifty-five-minute lecture to ACTS 17 followers at\u00a0Garry Tan\u2019s house<\/a>.<\/p>\n Prior to Tan, Sam Altman, the current CEO of OpenAI, served as president and CEO of YC. Like Huang\u2019s Hotspot, Altman\u2019s startup company, Loopt, was seed-funded\u00a0by YC in 2005<\/a>, when Altman was just 19 years old. Peter Thiel briefly joined the YC team in 2015, and Altman, then as President and CEO of YC, welcomed Thiel as he briefly took up his\u00a0official<\/em>\u00a0YC role, saying, \u201cPeter is one of the two people (along with PG [Paul Graham]) who have taught me the most about how to invest in startups.\u201d Thiel schooled Altman in accelerationism and they remain \u201cvery close friends<\/a>\u201d to this day.<\/p>\n Altman\u2019s OpenAI became the\u00a0first affiliate<\/a>\u00a0of YC Research (YCR). The various YCR projects were then calved off by Altman, eventually into\u00a0OpenResearch<\/a>. Among its many\u00a0disruptive<\/em>\u00a0projects, OpenResearch ran the US\u2019\u00a0largest ever trial<\/a>\u00a0of Universal Basic Income (UBI).<\/p>\n There is no point being coy. We can be certain where all this is heading.<\/p>\n Writing for\u00a0Unlimited Hangout<\/em><\/a>, researcher and journalist Stavroula Pabst pointed out the pitfalls of UBI by examining Altman\u2019s Worldcoin project. Worldcoin was the product of the OpenResearch UBI trials in the US. In order to access Worldcoin, \u201ccustomers\u201d have to submit their biometric identifier\u2014iris scans\u2014<\/em>to the Praxians. Once the Praxians have created your digital \u201cvalue\u201d\u2014<\/em>there is no other kind in the Praxian universe\u2014your digital identity is fixed to your programmable \u201cmoney\u201d, which you receive into your Praxian-approved digital wallet in the form of the founder\u2019s Worldcoin.<\/p>\n The public-private state doling out supposedly \u201cfree money\u201d (UBI) may seem like an appealing idea for some. It is never free. Pabst observed, \u201cWorldcoin uses smart contracts, digital infrastructure key to currency programmability.\u201d Thus, receipt of your Worldcoin UBI will be conditional. All your spending will be programmed, and your behaviour can and will be controlled. This vice-like behavioural control of populations is at the heart of Praxian ideology.<\/p>\n Returning to YC, Altman\u2019s journey took flight when Loopt received additional startup capital from Sequoia Capital assisted by YC. Unsurprisingly, Matt Huang, a YC alum, later became a partner at Sequoia Capital (2014 \u2013 2018), where he was credited with \u201cleading the firm\u2019s cryptocurrency efforts.\u201d Two years after Huang\u2019s influence and departure, Sequoia Capital heavily promoted the FTX crypto exchange run by Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) and subsequently invested $150 million in the Series B funding of FTX in\u00a0July 2021<\/a>.<\/p>\n In September 2022, Sequoia wrote a\u00a0glowing testimonial<\/a>\u00a0for SBF, noting that Sequoia partner Alfred Lin had applied his \u201cintellect\u201d and, having diligently studied cryptocurrencies for years, decided that a large Sequoia Capital investment in FTX would make \u201ctons of money.\u201d While only making a relatively small investment\u2014in Sequoia Capital terms\u2014the firms\u2019 public enthusiasm, evidently propelled by the YC accelerationist Praxians, contributed to the massive $32 billion overvaluation of FTX which, just a few weeks later in November 2022, precipitated its collapse. SBF was\u00a0convicted of fraud<\/a>\u00a0and sentenced to 25 years in prison in March 2024.<\/p>\n While the FTX collapse wasn\u2019t directly advantageous to Sequoia Capital, it was certainly a boon for the Praxians. This, despite the fact that, via his\u00a0Alameda Research<\/a>\u00a0trading firm, SBF was an early Praxis Nation investor. Spiked jitters over the unregulated crypto industry, heightened by the FTX debacle, gave\u00a0further impetus<\/a>\u00a0to push through Trump\u2019s GENIUS Act, which most certainly\u00a0directly<\/em>\u00a0benefits the Praxians.<\/p>\n Following SBF\u2019s arrest, Sequoia Capital informed its\u00a0shareholders<\/a>:<\/p>\n We are in the business of taking risk. Some investments will surprise to the upside, and some will surprise to the downside.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n One risky \u201csurprise to the downside\u201d could be the Praxians\u2019 possible culpability in the corporate manslaughter of Texan men, women and children. Alfred Lin (acting for Sequoia Capital), Peter Thiel, and Marc Andreessen were among the leading investors in\u00a0Long Journey Ventures<\/a>, which backed the geoengineering firm\u00a0Rainmaker<\/a>.<\/p>\n Rainmaker was busy flying drones, cloud seeding with silver iodide, in Texas Hill County on 2nd July 2025, two days before flash floods killed at least 135 people in Texas Hill and the neighbouring\u00a0Kerr County<\/a>. The officially approved fact-checkers were quick to deny any Rainmaker\u00a0causation<\/a>. The fact-kings reported their conversations with \u201cexperts\u201d who categorically ruled out any possible connection. This authoritative truth decree was nonsense but probably understandable.<\/p>\n The associated risks of cloud seeding are poorly understood and far from being \u201cknown.\u201d In December 2024, just eight months before the catastrophic Texan floods, the US Government Accountability Office (GAO) bemoaned the \u201cunavailable or unreliable data\u201d relating to cloud seeding and the \u201cuncertain safety of using silver iodide.\u201d Having \u201cinterviewed a range of stakeholder groups\u201d and having held an \u201cexpert meeting that included academics,\u201d the GAO investigated the risk\/benefit analysis of cloud seeding and\u00a0concluded<\/a>:<\/p>\n It is difficult to evaluate the effects of cloud seeding due to limitations of effectiveness research.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n What is\u00a0known\u00a0<\/em>is that cloud seeding operations, or \u201cpluviculture,\u201d immediately prior to lethal flooding in the same region have happened before. In 1952, for instance, the UK government\u2019s Operation Cumulus was cloud seeding in the English county of Devon shortly before the Lynmouth flood disaster that killed\u00a0thirty-two people<\/a>. Immediately prior to the genuinely unprecedented April 2024 floods in the UAE, scientists from the UAE\u2019s National Center of Meteorology (NCM) reportedly stated that the NCM\u00a0was engaged<\/a>\u00a0in pluviculture. Five UAE flood-related deaths were later\u00a0confirmed<\/a>.<\/p>\n Though there is no established link between pluviculture and deadly flood events, nor is there any basis to arbitrarily declare cloud seeding indisputably safe. A basic grasp of correlation should be enough to warrant a moratorium until the impacts of these geoengineering efforts are properly understood\u2014<\/em>or at least discussed honestly. The fact-checkers\u2019 bold safety assurances, following the Texas disaster, notably exonerating the Praxians, were high-risk denials based on absolutely nothing.<\/p>\n As will become clear, the Praxians are error-prone. They are not omniscient and frequently blunder. Unfortunately, the hand of the Praxian oligarch network can be seen manipulating everything from war to economic crisis, monetary system redesign, and more. If any group is likely to explore the\u00a0military application<\/a>\u00a0of weather modification, it is\u00a0them<\/a>. As we\u2019ll see, they certainly aren\u2019t averse to killing people in pursuit of their goals.<\/p>\n Journalists Mark Goodwin and Whitney Webb\u00a0reported<\/a>\u00a0another major event that had the distinct whiff of Praxian manipulation about it. The Praxians blatantly capitalised on the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB): a financial disaster which then spread a contagion to the larger and more influential\u00a0Signature Bank<\/a>\u00a0along with the smaller, but nonetheless important,\u00a0Silvergate Bank<\/a>.<\/p>\n All three banks, most crucially\u00a0Signature Bank<\/a>, were key players in financing the\u00a0crypto industry<\/a>. Goodwin and Webb reported that \u201c[t]he day before the SVB collapse, Peter Thiel\u2019s Founders Fund pulled out funds and advised clients to do the same, triggering deposit flight.\u201d<\/p>\n In response to the March 2023 collapse of SVB\u2014<\/em>and the seemingly inevitable implosion of Signature and Silvergate that followed\u2014in July 2025, Palmer Luckey,\u00a0partnered by<\/a>\u00a0Joe Lonsdale and Peter Thiel, formally launched Erebor Bank. The\u00a0openly stated<\/a>\u00a0purpose of Erbor is to fill the liquidity and financial services gap vacated by SVB, Signature and Silvergate. It appears the Praxians were involved in triggering the takedown of SVB and then pounced in the chaos to set up Erebor, thereby consolidating and extending their influence over the crypto industry.<\/p>\n Erebor was given the full approval to go operational by the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) less than three months later, in October 2025. As reported by\u00a0FirstPost<\/em><\/a>:<\/p>\n Erebor, in its filing, said it aims to become \u201cthe most regulated entity conducting and facilitating stablecoin transactions\u201d, to increase \u201cbroader acceptance of stablecoins\u201d, and to accept cryptocurrencies as collateral for some loans.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n \u201cMost regulated\u201d is a highly misleading Praxian claim because oversight of the Praxians\u2019 stablecoin and crypto ventures is murky to say the least. As I noted in\u00a0The Technocratic Dark State,\u00a0<\/em>the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), despite being a bureau within the US Department of the Treasury, is\u00a0uniquely independent<\/a>\u00a0of the US government:<\/p>\n The selection of the OCC as both the issuing authority and the \u201cfederal regulator\u201d for the NEONERDS\u2019 [Praxians\u2019] \u201cpayment stablecoins\u201d further distances them from any kind of public scrutiny.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Being able to issue their own digital currencies is essential for the Praxians. The\u00a0instigators<\/a>\u00a0of the Praxis Nation project, nearly all of whom are linked to YC, include Pronomos Capital (conspicuously backed by Peter Thiel and Marc Andreessen), Balaji Srinivasan (author of the Network State), Patri Friedman (another Thiel prot\u00e9g\u00e9 embedded within\u00a0Pronomos Capital<\/a>\u00a0alongside Srinivasan), Joe Lonsdale, Sam Altman, SBF and other neoreactionary accelerationists.<\/p>\n It is a constant, unremitting feature of this Trump administration: a public-private partnership between the Praxians and the US government, under Donald Trump, delivers exactly what the Praxians want. This could all be a massive coincidence, or we could take the Praxians at their word.<\/p>\n The Praxians are extremely fond of using metaphor, Aesopian language, in-jokes and symbolism. Fans of sci-fi and fantasy, trying to be ironically \u201ccool,\u201d the names they choose for their companies reveal their characteristic nerdiness. For example, Erebor, Anduril, Palantir, Mithril Capital, Sauron Systems, etc., are all Praxian corporations pithily named in homage to J. R. R. Tolkien\u2019s\u00a0<\/em>The<\/em>\u00a0<\/em>Lord of the Rings<\/em>.<\/em><\/p>\n The Praxians are doubtless familiar with the famous Tolkien quote that could so easily serve as a fitting Praxian adage:<\/p>\n One Ring to rule them all, one Ring to find them, one Ring to bring them all, and in the darkness bind them.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n As soon as the\u00a0Dark MAGA<\/a>\u00a0Republican team came into office, it started serving the interests of the Praxians. To begin with, this was largely at the expense of the American people, but now it is to everyone\u2019s detriment.<\/p>\n The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), established\u00a0by Trump,<\/a>\u00a0restructured the federal government, providing private contractors access to sensitive government data, including federal spending plans and citizens\u2019 financial, employment, and social security data. Trump issued an Executive Order (EO) to\u00a0eliminate information silos<\/a>\u00a0empowered the oligarchs\u2019 tech companies, like Palantir and Oracle, to create unified datasets, centralising control over the personal data of millions of US citizens, including their\u00a0health data<\/a>. Trump also committed US energy supplies to power the oligarchs\u2019 planned \u201cStargate\u201d AI data-centre expansion. Trump\u00a0pressurised<\/a>\u00a0America\u2019s defence manufacturers to prioritise rapid innovation and hi-tech warfare systems, opening the door for the Silicon Valley oligarchs\u2019\u00a0consortium bid<\/a>\u00a0to increase their foothold in the US\u00a0defence\u00a0<\/a>sector. Through the GENIUS Act, the Trump administration has effectively given these oligarchs the power to issue their own US dollar-backed currencies, which is perfect for the Praxians\u2019 network state startups.<\/p>\n The Praxians\u2019 sprawling web of commercial empires is mutually reinforcing. They invest in each other\u2019s technology \u201cstartup\u201d ventures, unwaveringly maximising the impact of their\u00a0accelerationism.<\/em><\/p>\n On the 5th of November 2025, the official X account of the Trump White House posted\u00a0a meme<\/a>\u00a0depicting Trump at the centre of the proposed flag of the Praxis Nation. It is a peculiar choice for a national flag, ominously dark and foreboding.<\/p>\nPraxian Accelerationism<\/strong><\/h2>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/unlimitedhangout.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/darkmagagovcorp.jpg\")
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/unlimitedhangout.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/photo_2025-03-13-06.28.17.jpeg\")
<\/div>\n<\/div>\nThe Praxians\u2019 Y Combinator<\/strong><\/h2>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/unlimitedhangout.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/altmantanycomb.jpeg\")
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/unlimitedhangout.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/photo_2022-12-08-12.51.29.jpeg.webp\")
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/unlimitedhangout.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/photo_2024-10-31-11.45.13.jpeg\")
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/unlimitedhangout.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/ereborai-1024x614.jpeg\")
Praxians In Control<\/h2>\n
![\"\"](\"http:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Praxian_01-1064x680-1-1024x654.webp\")
<\/p>\n