\n\u2015\u00a0Rachel Carson<\/strong><\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"http:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/68733813-817d-41b5-b58f-ef2816bb5f7e_940x627.webp\")
<\/p>\n
Many scientists and researchers today purport that the macro world operates differently than the subatomic \u201cquantum\u201d world which is simply not true. Natural Law is clear; the micro shares the same laws as the macro\u2014as above, so below, as within, so without.<\/p>\n
We should just call it what it is\u2014subatomic, teeny tiny, super small, microscopic, itty bitty, etc.\u2014and do away with using any \u201cquantum\u201d terminology. When we define things clearly for what they really are, natural understanding results. When we make up silly words like \u201cquantum\u201d to explain things we still do not comprehend fully, we neglect the higher knowledge that has existed throughout the ages, and that many have mastered without any need for anything \u201cquantum\u201d, we only limit ourselves. Once we return to concentrating on the laws of nature, we will go through an evolutionary leap\u2014not a \u201cquantum-leap\u201d.<\/p>\n
Remember, words matter and have real creative power to either expand or limit processes and one\u2019s capacities. The word\u00a0\u201cquantum\u201d\u00a0<\/strong>is actually defined as the \u201cthe smallest, indivisible unit or \u2018packet\u2019<\/strong>\u00a0of any physical property, such as energy, light, or matter.\u00a0Instead of being continuous<\/strong>, these properties exist in discrete, measurable amounts. It derives from the Latin for “how much,” referring to the\u00a0minimum amount<\/strong>\u00a0of something.\u201d<\/p>\n So when we say we want to go through a \u201cquantum-leap\u201d or gain \u201cquantum consciousness\u201d, we really are restricting ourselves unknowingly.<\/p>\n \u201cIf all this damned quantum jumping were really here to stay, I should be sorry. I should be sorry I ever got involved with quantum theory.\u201d<\/p>\n \u2014Erwin Schrodinger,\u00a0<\/strong>Austrian\u2013Irish theoretical physicist who developed fundamental results in quantum theory.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Consider the possibility that \u201cquantum science\u201d is being promoted to deliberately divert people away from liberating paths of real knowledge that lead to fruitful inventions that support nature as a whole, and instead push people\u2019s minds into digital dead-ends, while secretive organizations and aerospace corps use the real science behind the scenes.<\/p>\n We get showtime moments like staged rocket launches. Check out this quote below about the work of Thomas Townsend Brown. Brown was a very nuts and bolts inventor of advanced propulsion systems and played a prominent role in of the Philadelphia Experiment. He was also the foremost expert on radar in the Navy and worked in the highest levels of government:<\/p>\n \u201cAccording to Kitselman, young Thomas Brown looked to the heavens, dreamed of traveling among the stars \u2013 and pondered the means of propulsion by which that might be accomplished.<\/p>\n He dismissed rocket power as \u201ca brute and awkward force,\u201d and wondered if electricity could shrink the distance between the stars more efficiently than the controlled explosion of combustible gasses.<\/strong><\/p>\n Such thoughts simmered as his CalTech physics class conducted experiments with an X-Ray tube.<\/p>\n While the rest of the class was focused on the tube itself, \u201cTom\u201d\u00a0observed that when a high-voltage current was applied, the cables connecting the tube to the power supply appeared to jump with snake-like convulsions.<\/strong>\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n The fact that the mainstream science available to the public today is incomplete and filled with erred foundational principles that do not wholly reflect the nature of reality abounds in \u201cquantum science\u201d. How can one know that the super tiny subatomic world works differently than the macro world when they still don\u2019t understand the macro world fully? Instead, their minds have been circumvented into this \u201cquantum\u201d world of confusing contradictions which they can\u2019t even agree on among themselves.<\/p>\n \u201cIf you are not completely confused by quantum mechanics, you do not understand it.\u201d\u00a0\u2014John Wheeler,<\/strong>\u00a0American theoretical physicist who revived general relativity in the US, coined the terms “black hole” and\u00a0pioneered the very destructive anti-nature nuclear fission theory<\/strong><\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n \u201cI think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics\u201d\u2014Richard Feynman<\/strong>,\u00a0was a Nobel Prize-winning American theoretical physicist renowned for\u00a0<\/strong>revolutionizing quantum electrodynamics (QED)<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n When there are fundamental flaws in understandings\u2014such as erred beliefs regarding reciprocal processes, chemical elements, and the real role that thermodynamics really plays\u2014the conclusions drawn will also be flawed . Many scientists today who push quantum narratives have very one-sided views and are basing their \u201cdiscoveries\u201d on shaky foundations that do not hold up when put to the light.<\/p>\n If only scientists today took more time to consider Natural Law and it\u2019s many applications\u2014since that was what Nikola Tesla used to make his inventions. I did find one award winning physicist, Louis A. Del Monte, who bravely brought Natural Law into the world of \u201cquantum science\u201d in an\u00a0article written back in 2013<\/a>.<\/p>\n Since \u201cquantum science\u201d is so convoluted and deceptive; with fictitious concepts that have no real basis, it can only provide a mix of truth and falsities, and lacks real coherence. So when one does actually have the intellectual fortitude to bring the truthful higher understandings to the forefront, as Del Monte has done, we get a much clearer pictures of where the distortions lay. He gets to the root of it:<\/p>\n \u201cIn our everyday world, the macro level, we generally use Einstein\u2019s special or general relativity to describe the behavior of reality. Thus, it appears we need two separate set of \u201claws\u201d to describe reality, one for the quantum level and one for the macro level. In addition, quantum mechanics is incompatible with general relativity. This suggests that quantum mechanics may not apply at the macro level. However, in 2010, an important experiment suggested that quantum mechanics is applicable to the macro level.<\/p>\n What happened on December 2010? Scientists at the University of Santa Barbara, United States, published a paper \u201cQuantum mechanics applies to the motion of macroscopic objects\u201d\u2026<\/p>\n Measurements of the vibrational energy showed that the results exactly followed the predictions of the quantum mechanics.\u00a0The quantum level and the macro level,\u00a0<\/strong>given the appropriate physical circumstances<\/strong><\/em>,\u00a0follow the same natural laws<\/strong>. This one experiment may have put us one step closer to a unified theory of everything, the \u201choly grail\u201d of physics.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n While Del Monte has brought up some important points, his understanding here is clearly limited by the \u201cquantum\u201d definitions themselves. Since the \u201choly grail\u201d of physics has already been discovered, this all seems like a ridiculous backpedal.<\/p>\n