{"id":55064,"date":"2026-03-12T17:50:16","date_gmt":"2026-03-12T21:50:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/?p=55064"},"modified":"2026-03-12T17:55:11","modified_gmt":"2026-03-12T21:55:11","slug":"trump-told-tankers-to-show-some-guts-then-they-were-bombed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/?p=55064","title":{"rendered":"

Trump Told Tankers to \u2018Show Some Guts.\u2019 Then They Were Bombed.<\/span><\/b><\/h1>"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"\"\"<\/p>\n

\n

President\u00a0Donald Trump <\/strong>told<\/a>\u00a0commercial ships waiting near the Strait of Hormuz to \u201cshow some guts.\u201d<\/p>\n

The comment came during a Sunday interview with Fox & Friends co-host\u00a0Brian Kilmeade<\/strong>\u00a0in which the president insisted Iran\u2019s military had been effectively neutralized by recent U.S. strikes. Tehran, he said, no longer had the capacity to threaten maritime traffic through one of the most important oil chokepoints on the planet. There was little to fear. Tankers could move.<\/p>\n

That framing collided almost immediately with events on the water.<\/p>\n

Within days, at least two commercial vessels were\u00a0struck<\/a>\u00a0in Gulf waters. Two oil tankers burned after attacks near Iraq\u2019s port of Basra, with at least one crew member killed. Other ships reported projectiles or drone strikes in nearby waters. Energy markets reacted predictably.\u00a0Oil prices surged<\/a>\u00a0back above $100 a barrel as traders recalculated the risks attached to the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow corridor through which a substantial portion of the world\u2019s crude supply moves each day.<\/p>\n

Shipping companies and insurers tend to approach such situations with less rhetorical flourish than politicians. Tanker operators do not rely on presidential assurances when deciding whether to send multi-million-dollar vessels through a potential combat zone. They watch insurance premiums, maritime threat advisories, naval escort capacity, and satellite intelligence. When ships begin burning in a strategic waterway, the calculus changes fast.<\/p>\n

Even a handful of successful attacks can ripple through the global economy. The Strait of Hormuz does not need to be fully closed to create disruption. The mere possibility that ships could be struck forces insurers to price the risk accordingly, and the cost of moving oil rises with it.<\/p>\n

None of this alters a basic strategic reality. The United States military remains overwhelmingly more powerful than Iran\u2019s conventional forces \u2014 the gap resembles the 96 Chicago Bulls facing a private school\u2019s JV squad. American naval and air power can dismantle ports, destroy missile batteries, and eliminate surface vessels with extraordinary efficiency, which appears to be the case. The outcome of a direct confrontation has rarely been in doubt among military analysts.<\/p>\n

The much more difficult question is what follows that dominance. Airstrikes can degrade military capability and cripple infrastructure, but they rarely dissolve political systems. If Iran\u2019s leadership survives the opening blows \u2014 and early indications suggest it largely has \u2014 the regime remains the central actor in whatever comes next.\u00a0Mojtaba Khamenei<\/strong>\u00a0now occupies the same office his father held, and the Islamic Republic hasn\u2019t vanished simply because its military took a heavy blow.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s the distinction that matters here. Degrading or eliminating Iran\u2019s nuclear program is a legitimate and significant objective \u2014 one that many serious analysts across ideological lines have long considered necessary. But achieving it doesn\u2019t produce regime change, and it doesn\u2019t remove Iran\u2019s ability to impose costs through asymmetric tactics.<\/p>\n

Iran has spent decades preparing for exactly that environment. Its military doctrine doesn\u2019t depend on defeating the United States in a conventional fight. It depends on creating instability in places that matter economically: oil infrastructure, maritime routes, proxy conflicts, missile harassment that raises the price of normal commerce. The strategy isn\u2019t about winning in a traditional sense. It\u2019s about ensuring that even a weakened Iran can make life uncomfortable for its adversaries.<\/p>\n

Viewed through that lens, the tanker attacks take on a clearer meaning. Trump\u2019s comments about ships showing courage weren\u2019t really aimed at tanker captains waiting in the Gulf. They were a signal intended for Tehran and for global markets: Iran had been crippled, the waterway was open, the United States controlled the strategic environment.<\/p>\n

The explosions that followed were a response of their own.<\/p>\n

Both sides are operating within the same logic. Trump needs Iran to appear defeated. Markets stabilize, the intervention looks decisive, and the political case for the operation strengthens. Iran needs to appear undefeated. Its deterrence survives, its regional proxies remain confident, and its leverage endures. Neither side can afford to let the other\u2019s narrative settle uncontested. The fight is not only over shipping lanes but over the perception of who controls them.<\/p>\n

Trump\u2019s instinct to project confidence in moments like this is understandable. Markets respond to signals from Washington, and political leaders routinely try to reassure them that trade routes are secure. But confidence that drifts into bravado can obscure a more complicated reality \u2014 conflicts almost never end as cleanly as early declarations insist.<\/p>\n

In modern conflict, statements delivered on television and signals sent through explosions often travel along the same strategic channel.<\/p>\n

____
\nhttps:\/\/www.yahoo.com\/news\/articles\/trump-told-tankers-show-guts-133720181.html<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-55064","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55064","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=55064"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55064\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=55064"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=55064"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=55064"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}