![\"\"](\"http:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/big0.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
INDISPUTABLE EVIDENCE CONFIRMS: 9\/11 was both an “Inside Job” and “Mossad Job”<\/h1>\n9\/11 Was an Israeli Job<\/u><\/strong><\/h2>\nHow America was neoconned into World War IV<\/em><\/h3>\nLAURENT GUY\u00c9NOT
\nThe Unz Review<\/p>\n
Technical impossibilities<\/a><\/h2>\nThanks to courageous investigators, many anomalies in the official explanation of the events of 9\/11 were posted on the Internet in the following months, providing evidence that this was a false flag operation, and that Osama bin Laden was innocent, as he repeatedly declared in the Afghan and Pakistani press and on Al Jazeera.[1]<\/i><\/a>\u00a0The proofs of this appalling fraud have been accumulating ever since, and are now accessible to anyone willing to spend a few hours of research on the Web. (Although, while preparing this article, I noticed that Google is now making access to that research more difficult than it was five years ago, artificially prioritizing anti-conspiracy sites.)<\/span><\/p>\nFor example, members of\u00a0Architects and Engineers for 9\/11 Truth<\/a>\u00a0have demonstrated that it was impossible for plane crashes and jet fuel fires to trigger the collapse of the Twin Towers. Even\u00a0Donald Trump understood this<\/a>. In fact, speaking of \u201ccollapse\u201d is perhaps misleading: the towers literally exploded, pulverizing concrete and projecting pieces of steel beams weighing several hundred tons hundreds of meters laterally at high speeds. The\u00a0pyroclastic dust<\/a>\u00a0that immediately flooded through the streets, not unlike the dust from a volcano, indicates a high temperature mixture of hot gasses and relatively dense solid particles, an impossible phenomenon in a simple collapse. It is also impossible that\u00a0WTC7<\/a>, another skyscraper (47 stories), which had not been hit by a plane, collapsed into its own footprint at near free-fall speed, unless by \u201ccontrolled demolition.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nTestimonies of firefighters<\/a>\u00a0recorded shortly after the events describe sequences of explosions just before the \u201ccollapse\u201d, well below the plane impact. The presence of molten metal in the wreckage up to three weeks after the attack is inexplicable except by the presence of incompletely burned explosives. Firefighter Philip Ruvolo testified before \u00c9tienne Sauret\u2019s camera for his film\u00a0Collateral Damages<\/i><\/a>\u00a0(2011): \u201cYou\u2019d get down below and you\u2019d see molten steel\u2014molten steel running down the channelways, like you were in a foundry\u2014like lava.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nAviation professionals<\/a>\u00a0have also reported impossibilities in the behavior of the planes. The charted speeds of the two aircraft hitting the Twin Towers, 443 mph and 542 mph, exclude these aircraft being Boeing 767s, because these speeds are virtually impossible near ground level. In the unlikely event such speeds could be attained without the aircraft falling apart, flying them accurately into the towers was mission impossible, especially by the amateur pilots blamed for the hijacking.\u00a0Hosni Mubarak, a former pilot, said he could never do it<\/a>. (He is not the only head of state to have voiced his doubts:\u00a0Chavez<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0Ahmadinejad<\/a>\u00a0are among them.) Recall that neither of the black boxes of the jetliners was ever found, an incomprehensible situation.<\/span><\/p>\nAnd of course, there are the obvious anomalies of Shanksville and Pentagon crash sites: no plane or credible plane debris can be seen on any of the numerous photos easily available.<\/span><\/p>\nInside Job or Mossad Job?<\/a><\/h2>\nAmong the growing number of Americans who disbelieve the official version of the 9\/11 attacks, two basic theories are in competition: I called them \u201cinside job\u201d and \u201cMossad job\u201d. The first one is the dominant thesis within the so-called 9\/11 Truth movement, and blames the American government, or a faction within the American Deep State. The second one claims that the masterminds were members of a powerful Israeli network deeply infiltrated in all spheres of power within the US, including media, government, military and secret services.<\/span><\/p>\nThis \u201cMossad job\u201d thesis has been gaining ground since Alan Sabrosky, a professor at the U.S. Army War College and the U.S. Military Academy, published in July 2012\u00a0an article entitled \u201cDemystifying 9\/11: Israel and the Tactics of Mistake\u201d<\/a>, where he voiced his conviction that September 11th<\/sup>\u00a0was \u201ca classic Mossad-orchestrated operation.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nWe can notice from the outset that incriminating Israelis or Arabs are both \u201coutside job\u201d theories (in fact, they are mirror images of each other, which is understandable in light of what Gilad Atzmon explains about Jewish \u201cprojected guilt\u201d).[2]<\/i><\/i><\/a>\u00a0Before even looking at the evidence, \u201coutside job\u201d sounds more credible that \u201cinside job\u201d. There is something monstrous in the idea that a government can deceive and terrorize its own citizens by killing thousands of them, just for starting a series of wars that are not even in the nation\u2019s interest. By comparison, a foreign power attacking the U.S. under the false flag of a third power almost seems like fair play. Indeed suspicion of Israel\u2019s role should be natural to anyone aware of the reputation of the Mossad as: \u201cWildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian\/Arab act,\u201d in the words of a report of the U.S. Army School for Advanced Military Studies\u00a0quoted by the\u00a0<\/a>Washington Times<\/i>, September 10th<\/sup>, 2001<\/a>\u00a0\u2014 the day before the attacks.<\/span><\/p>\nThis is an important point, because it raises the question of how and why the 9\/11 Truth movement has been led to endorse massively the outrageous \u201cinside job\u201d thesis without even considering the more likely thesis of an attack by a foreign power acting under an Islamic false flag\u2014and what foreign power but Israel would do that?<\/span><\/p>\nOf course, the two dissenting theses do not necessarily exclude each other; at least, no one incriminating Israel denies that corrupted elements from the American administration or deep state were involved. The\u00a0\u201cpassionate attachment\u201d<\/a>\u00a0between Israel and the U.S. has been going on for decades, and 9\/11 is one of its monstrous offsprings.<\/span><\/p>\nI can think of no better symbol of that reality than the marriage of\u00a0Ted and Barbara Olson<\/a>. Ted Oslon, after having defended Bush in the disputed 2000 election, had been rewarded with the post of Solicitor General (he also defended Dick Cheney when he refused to submit to Congress Enron-related documents). Barbara was a famous CNN reporter, but before that, she was born Barbara Kay Bracher of Jewish parents, educated at Yeshiva University School of Law, and hired by the legal firm WilmerHale, of which Jamie Gorelick, a future member of the 9\/11 Commission, was also a member, and whose clients include powerful Israeli firms like Amdocs, a digital communication company charged with\u00a0spying for Israel in the United States<\/a>. On September 11, 2001, Barbara Olson allegedly was on flight AA77, from which she made two telephone calls to her husband. Her calls were reported on CNN in the afternoon, and contributed to crystallize some details of the official story, such as the \u201cbox cutters\u201d used as only weapons by the hijackers. Repeatedly invited on television shows after 9\/11, Ted Olson frequently contradicted himself when questioned about the calls from his wife. In a 2006 report, the FBI identified only one call from Barbara Olson, and it was an unconnected call lasting 0 seconds. Like all other reported phone calls from desperate passengers (including the famous \u201cHi, Mom. This is Mark Bingham\u201d), Barbara\u2019s call was simply impossible, because the technology required to make high-altitude phone calls was not developed until 2004.[3]<\/i><\/i><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n9\/11 was made possible by an alliance between secret worshippers of Israel and corrupted American elements. The question is: who, of the two, were the masterminds of this incredibly daring and complex operation, and for what \u201chigher purpose\u201d?<\/span><\/p>\nAnother question is: why do those who keep repeating as a mantra\u00a0\u201c9\/11 was an inside job\u201d\u00a0<\/i>ignore totally the compelling evidence pointing to Israel? In other words, to what extent do they constitute a \u201ccontrolled opposition\u201d intended to cover up for Israel? Asking this type of question does not mean suspecting anyone who defends an erroneous or incomplete theory of being a hypocrite. Most people defending one theory or the other do so sincerely, based on the information to which they have access. I have myself been a believer in the official theory for 7 years, and in the \u201cinside job\u201d theory for 2 years, before progressively moving on to the present argument from 2010. On the other hand, we can assume that those who lead the public into error on a long term are not just mistaken but lying. In any case, it is legitimate to investigate the background of opinion makers, and when they are caught lying or distorting the truth, we can speculate on their motivation. I will come back to this issue at the end of the article.<\/span><\/p>\nThe dancing Israelis<\/a><\/h2>\nResearchers who believe Israel orchestrated 9\/11 cite the behavior of a group of individuals who have come to be known as the \u201cdancing Israelis\u201d since their arrest, though their aim was to pass as \u201cdancing Arabs.\u201d Dressed in ostensibly \u201cMiddle Eastern\u201d attire, they were seen by various witnesses standing on the roof of a van parked in Jersey City, cheering and taking photos of each other with the WTC in the background, at the very moment the first plane hit the North Tower. The suspects then moved their van to another parking spot in Jersey City, where other witnesses saw them deliver the same ostentatious celebrations.<\/span><\/p>\nOne anonymous call to the police in Jersey City, reported the same day by\u00a0NBC News,\u00a0<\/i>mentioned \u201ca white van, 2 or 3 guys in there. They look like Palestinians and going around a building. [\u2026] I see the guy by Newark Airport mixing some junk and he has those sheikh uniforms. [\u2026] He\u2019s dressed like an Arab.\u201d The police soon issued the following BOLO alert (be-on-the-look-out) for a \u201cVehicle possibly related to New York terrorist attack. White, 2000 Chevrolet van with New Jersey registration with \u2018Urban Moving Systems\u2019 sign on back seen at Liberty State Park, Jersey City, NJ, at the time of first impact of jetliner into World Trade Center. Three individuals with van were seen celebrating after initial impact and subsequent explosion.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nBy chance, the van was intercepted around 4 pm, with five young men inside: Sivan and Paul Kurzberg, Yaron Shmuel, Oded Ellner, and Omer Marmari. Before any question was asked, the driver, Sivan Kurzberg, burst out: \u201cWe are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are your problem\u201d.The Kurzberg brothers were formally identified as Mossad agents. All five officially worked for a moving company (a classic cover for espionage) named Urban Moving Systems, whose owner, Dominik Otto Suter, fled the country for Tel Aviv on September 14.[4]<\/i><\/a><\/span><\/p>\nThis event was first reported the day after the attacks by journalist\u00a0Paulo Lima in the New Jersey newspaper\u00a0<\/a>The Bergen Record<\/i><\/a>, based on \u201csources close to the investigation\u201d who were convinced of the suspects\u2019 foreknowledge of the morning\u2019s attacks: \u201cIt looked like they knew what was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park\u201d.The 579-page\u00a0FBI report on the investigation<\/a>\u00a0that followed (partially declassified in 2005) reveals several important facts. First, once developed, the photos taken by the suspects while watching the North Tower on fire confirm their attitudes of celebration: \u201cThey smiled, they hugged each other and they appeared to \u2018high five\u2019 one another\u201d. To explain their contentment, the suspects said they were simply happy that, thanks to these terrorist attacks, \u201cthe United States will take steps to stop terrorism in the world\u201d. Yet at this point, before the second tower was hit, most Americans believed the crash was an accident. The five Israelis were found connected to another company called Classic International Movers, which employed five other Israelis arrested for their contacts with the nineteen presumed suicide hijackers. In addition, one of the five suspects had called \u201can individual in South America with authentic ties to Islamic militants in the middle east\u201d. Finally, the FBI report states that the \u201cThe vehicle was also searched by a trained bomb-sniffing dog which yielded a positive result for the presence of explosive traces\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\nAfter all this incriminating evidence comes the most puzzling passage of the report: its conclusion that \u201cthe FBI no longer has any investigative interests in the detainees and they should proceed with the appropriate immigration proceedings\u201d. In fact, a letter addressed to the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service, dated September 25, 2001, proves that, less than two weeks after the events, the FBI federal headquarter had already decided to close the investigation, asking that \u201cThe U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service should proceed with the appropriate immigration proceedings\u201d. The five \u201cdancing Israelis\u201d, also known as \u201cthe high fivers\u201d,<\/i>\u00a0were detained 71 days in a Brooklyn prison, where they first refused, then failed, lie detector tests. Finally, they were quietly returned to Israel under the minimal charge of \u201cvisa violation.\u201d Three of them were then invited on an Israeli TV talk show in November 2001, where one of them ingenuously declared:\u00a0\u201cOur purpose was simply to document the event.\u201d<\/a><\/span><\/p>\nThe Israeli spy network<\/a><\/h2>\nThe five \u201cdancing Israelis,\u201d the only suspects arrested on the very day of the 9\/11 attacks, were just the tip of an iceberg. In September 2001, the federal police were busy dismantling the largest Israeli spy network ever uncovered on American soil. In the summer preceding the attack, the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) compiled a report which would be revealed to the public by the\u00a0Washington Post<\/i>\u00a0on November 23rd<\/sup>, 2001, followed by a\u00a0Carl Cameron\u2019s four-part documentary broadcast on Fox News<\/a>\u00a0from December 11th<\/sup>, 2001. On March 14th<\/sup>, 2002, an article in French newspaper\u00a0Le Monde<\/i>\u00a0signed by Sylvain Cypel also referred to the report, shortly before the French magazine\u00a0Intelligence Online<\/i>\u00a0made it\u00a0fully accessible on the Internet<\/a>.[5]<\/i><\/a>It said that 140 Israeli spies, aged between 20 and 30, had been arrested since March 2001, while 60 more were arrested after September 11. Generally posing as art students, they visited at least \u201c36 sensitive sites of the Department of Defense.\u201d \u201cA majority of those questioned have stated they served in military intelligence, electronic signal intercept, or explosive ordnance units. Some have been linked to high-ranking officials in the Israeli military. One was the son of a two-star general, one served as the bodyguard to the head of the Israeli Army, one served in a Patriot mission unit.\u201d Another, Peer Segalovitz, officer in the 605 Battalion of the Golan Heights, \u201cacknowledged he could blow up buildings, bridges, cars, and anything else that he needed to.\u201d[6]<\/i><\/a><\/span><\/p>\nOf special interest is the mention that \u201cthe Hollywood, Florida, area seems to be a central point for these individuals.\u201d[7]<\/i><\/a>\u00a0More than 30 out of the 140 fake Israeli students identified before 9\/11 lived in that city of 140,000 inhabitants. And this city also happens to be the place where fifteen of the nineteen alleged 9\/11 Islamist hijackers had regrouped (nine in Hollywood, six in the vicinity), including four of the five supposed to have hijacked Flight AA11. What was the relationship between the Israeli spies and the Islamist terrorists? We were told by\u00a0mainstream news<\/a>\u00a0that the former were monitoring the latter, but failed to report suspicious activities of these terrorists to American authorities. From such a presentation, Israel comes out clean, since a spy agency cannot be blamed for not sharing information with the country it is spying in. At worst, the Israeli Intelligence can be accused of \u201cletting it happen\u201d\u2014a guarantee of impunity. In reality, the Israeli agents were certainly not just monitoring the future \u201chijackers,\u201d but financing and manipulating them, before disposing of them. We know that Israeli Hanan Serfaty, who rented two flats near Mohamed Atta, had handled at least $100,000 in three months. And we also learned from the\u00a0New York Times<\/i>\u00a0on February 19, 2009<\/a>, that Ali al-Jarrah, cousin of the alleged hijacker of Flight UA93 Ziad al-Jarrah, had spent twenty-five years spying for the Mossad as an undercover agent infiltrating the Palestinian resistance and Hezbollah.<\/span><\/p>\nIsraeli agents apparently appreciate operating under the cover of artists. Shortly before September 11, a group of fourteen Jewish \u201cartists\u201d under the name of\u00a0Gelatin<\/a>\u00a0installed themselves on the ninety-first floor of the north tower of the World Trade Center. There, as a work of \u201cstreet art,\u201d they removed a window and extended a wooden balcony. To understand what role this piece of scaffolding may have played, it must be remembered that the explosion supposedly resulting from the impact of the Boeing AA11 on the North Tower took place between the ninety-second and the ninety-eighth floors. With the only film of the impact on the North Tower being that of the Naudet brothers, who are under suspicion for numerous reasons, many researchers are convinced that no aircraft hit this tower, and that the explosion simulating the impact was provoked by pre-planted explosives inside the tower.<\/span><\/p>\nFloors ninety-three to one hundred of the North Tower were occupied by Marsh & McLennan, whose CEO was Jeffrey Greenberg, son of wealthy Zionist (and financier of George W. Bush) Maurice Greenberg, who also happens to be the owner of Kroll Inc., the firm in charge of security for the entire World Trade Center complex on 9\/11. The Greenbergs were also the insurers of the Twin Towers and, on July 24, 2001, they took the precaution of having the contract reinsured by competitors. In November 2000, the board of directors of Marsh & McLennan was joined by (Lewis) Paul Bremer, the chairman of the National Commission on Terrorism, who, on September 11, 2001, two hours only after the pulverization of the North Tower, would\u00a0appear on NBC to name bin Laden as prime suspect<\/a>, perfectly calm as 400 of his employees are missing (295 will finally be declared dead). \u201cIt is the day that will change our lives,\u201d he said. \u201cIt is the day when the war that the terrorists declared on the US [. . .] has been brought home to the US.\u201d In 2003, Bremer would be appointed administrator of the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq to level the Iraqi state to the ground and oversee the theft of almost a trillion dollars intended for its reconstruction.<\/span><\/p>\nThe super-sayanim<\/a><\/h2>\nWith Goldberg and Bremer, we have reached the upper level of the conspiracy, comprising a number of influential Jewish personalities, working inside and outside the U.S. government \u2014 super-sayanim<\/i>, so to speak. The most representative of those outside government is Larry Silverstein, the real estate shark who, with his partner Frank Lowy, leased the Twin Towers from New York City in the spring of 2001. The head of the New York Port Authority, who granted Silverstein and Lowy the lease, was none other than Lewis Eisenberg, another member of the United Jewish Appeal Federation and former vice-president of AIPAC. It appeared that Silverstein had made a disastrous deal, because\u00a0the Twin Towers had to be decontaminated for asbestos<\/a>. The decontamination process had been indefinitely postponed since the 1980s because of its cost, estimated at nearly $1 billion in 1989. In 2001, the New York Port Authority had been all too happy to shift responsibility to Silverstein.<\/span><\/p>\nImmediately after acquiring the Twin Towers, Silverstein renegotiated the insurance contracts to cover terrorist attacks, doubling the coverage to $3.5 billion, and made sure he would retain the right to rebuild after such an event. After the attacks, he took his insurers to court in order to receive double compensation, claiming that the two planes were two separate attacks. After a long legal battle,\u00a0he pocketed $4.5 billion<\/a>. Silverstein is a leading member of the United Jewish Appeal Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York, the biggest fundraiser for Israel (after the US government, which pays about $3 billion per year in aid to Israel). Silverstein also maintained \u201cclose ties with Netanyahu,\u201d according to\u00a0Haaretz\u00a0<\/i>(November 21, 2001)<\/a>: \u201cThe two have been on friendly terms since Netanyahu\u2019s stint as Israel\u2019s ambassador to the United Nations. For years they kept in close touch. Every Sunday afternoon, New York time, Netanyahu would call Silverstein.\u201d Besides being a powerful man, Larry is a lucky man:\u00a0as he explained in this interview<\/a>, every morning of the week, he had breakfast at the\u00a0Windows on the World<\/i>\u00a0on top of the North Tower, but on September 11th, he had an appointment with his dermatologist.<\/span><\/p>\nAccomplices to the 9\/11 false flag attack with strong Israeli connections should also be tracked at the other end of the trajectory of the planes reported to have crashed into the Twin Towers. Flights AA11 and UA175 took off from Logan Airport in Boston, which subcontracted their security to International Consultants on Targeted Security\u00a0(ICTS), a firm based in Israel and headed by Menachem Atzmon<\/a>, a treasurer of the Likud. So did Newark Airport where flight UA93 reportedly took off before crashing in Shanksville.<\/span><\/p>\nA serious investigation would follow many other trails, such as the Odigo instant messages received by employees at the WTC two hours before the plane crashes, as reported by\u00a0Haaretz<\/a>\u00a0<\/i>on September 27th<\/sup>, 2001. The first plane hit the WTC at the precise time announced,\u00a0\u201calmost to the minute,\u201d<\/a>\u00a0admitted Alex Diamandis, vice-president of Odigo, headquartered in Israel. Also disturbing is the behavior of the American branch of\u00a0Zim Israel Navigational,<\/i>\u00a0a maritime shipping giant 48% owned by the Jewish state (occasionally used as a cover for the Israeli secret services), which moved its offices from the WTC, along with its 200 employees, September 4th<\/sup>, 2001, one week before the attacks \u2014\u201clike an act of God, we moved\u201d,\u00a0<\/i>said the CEO Shaul Cohen-Mintz when\u00a0interviewed by\u00a0<\/a>USA Today<\/i>, November 17th<\/sup>, 2001<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\nBut of course, none of these trails were ever pursued. That is because the most powerful conspirators were at the highest level of the Justice Department. Michael Chertoff was head of the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice in 2001, and responsible, among many other things, for securing the release of the Israeli agents arrested before and after 9\/11, including the \u201cdancing Israelis.\u201d In 2003, this son of a rabbi and of a Mossad pioneer would be appointed Secretary of Homeland Security, in charge of counter-terrorism on the American soil, which allowed him to control dissenting citizens and restrain access to the evidence under the pretext of Sensitive Security Information.<\/span><\/p>\nAnother chief of the cover-up was Philip Zelikow, the executive director of the 9\/11 presidential Commission established in November 2002. Zelikow is a self-styled specialist in the art of making \u201cpublic myths\u201d by \u201c\u2018searing\u2019 or \u2018molding\u2019 events [that] take on \u2018transcendent\u2019 importance and, therefore, retain their power even as the experiencing generation passes from the scene\u201d (Wikipedia<\/a>). In December 1998, he co-signed an article for\u00a0Foreign Affairs<\/i>\u00a0entitled \u201cCatastrophic Terrorism,\u201d<\/a>\u00a0in which he speculated on what would have happened if the 1993 WTC bombing (already attributed to bin Laden) had been done with a nuclear bomb: \u201cAn act of catastrophic terrorism that killed thousands or tens of thousands of people and\/or disrupted the necessities of life for hundreds of thousands, or even millions, would be a watershed event in America\u2019s history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented for peacetime and undermine Americans\u2019 fundamental sense of security within their own borders in a manner akin to the 1949 Soviet atomic bomb test, or perhaps even worse. \uf05b\u2026\uf05d Like Pearl Harbor, the event would divide our past and future into a before and after. The United States might respond with draconian measures scaling back civil liberties, allowing wider surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects and use of deadly force.\u201d This is the man who controlled the governmental investigation on the 9\/11 terror attacks. Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, who nominally led the commission, revealed in their book\u00a0Without Precedent: The Inside Story of the 9\/11 Commission\u00a0<\/i>(2006), that the commission \u201cwas set up to fail\u201d from the beginning. Zelikow, they claim, had already written a synopsis and a conclusion for the final report before the first meeting. He controlled all the working groups, prevented them from communicating with each other, and gave them as sole mission to prove the official story; Team 1A, for example, was tasked to \u201ctell the story of Al-Qaeda\u2019s most successful operation\u2014the 9\/11 attacks.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nA tight control of mainstream media is perhaps the most delicate aspect of the whole operation. I will not delve into that aspect, for we all know what to expect from the MSM. For a groundbreaking argument on the extent to which 9\/11 was psy-op orchestrated by MSM, I recommend\u00a0Ace Baker\u2019s 2012 documentary\u00a09\/11 The Great American Psy-Opera<\/i><\/a>,\u00a0<\/i>chapters 6, 7 and 8.<\/span><\/p>\nMachiavellian meta-Zionists<\/a><\/h2>\nIf we move up to the very highest level of the conspiracy, we find ourselves in Tel Aviv. The preparation for 9\/11 coincided with the coming to power of Benjamin Netanyahu in 1996, followed by Ehud Barak in July 1999, and Ariel Sharon in March 2001, who brought back Netanyahu as minister of Foreign Affairs in 2002 (with Netanyahu again becoming prime minister in 2009). It must be noted that both Netanyahu and Ehud Barak were temporarily out of the Israeli government in September 2001, just like Ben-Gurion at the time of Kennedy\u2019s assassination (read my article on JFK<\/a>). A few months before 9\/11, Barak, a former head of Israeli military intelligence, was \u201crecruited\u201d as a consultant to a Mossad front company, SCP Partner, specializing in security and located less than seven miles from Urban Moving Systems.[8]<\/i><\/i><\/a>\u00a0One hour after the explosion of the North Tower,\u00a0Barak was on BBC World<\/a>\u00a0to point the finger at bin Laden (the first to do so), and concluded: \u201cIt\u2019s a time to launch an operational, complete war against terror.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nAs for Netanyahu, we are not surprised to hear him boast, on\u00a0CNN in 2006<\/a>, of having predicted in 1995 that, \u201cif the West doesn\u2019t wake up to the suicidal nature of militant Islam, the next thing you will see is militant Islam bringing down the World Trade Center.\u201d Netanyahu is exemplary of the ever closer \u201cspecial relationship\u201d between the US and Israel, which started with Truman and blossomed under Johnson. Netanyahu had lived, studied, and worked in the United States from 1960 to 1978, between his 11th<\/sup>and his 27th<\/sup>\u00a0year\u2014except during his military service\u2014and again after the age of 33, when he was appointed deputy ambassador to Washington and then permanent delegate to the United Nations. Netanyahu appeared regularly on CNN in the early 1990s, contributing to the transformation of the world\u2019s leading news channel into a major Zionist propaganda tool. His political destiny was largely planned and shaped in the United States, under the supervision of those we now call neoconservatives, and the only thing that distinguishes him from them is that, for public relations reasons, he does not possess American nationality.<\/span><\/p>\n\u201cWhat\u2019s a neocon?\u201d once asked Bush 43 to his father Bush 41, after more than three years in the White House. \u201cDo you want names, or a description?\u201d answered 41. \u201cDescription.\u201d \u201cWell,\u201d said 41, \u201cI\u2019ll give it to you in one word: Israel.\u201d[9]<\/i><\/a>\u00a0That anecdote, quoted by Andrew Cockburn, sums it up. The neoconservative movement was born in the editorial office of the monthly magazine\u00a0Commentary<\/i>, which had replaced the\u00a0Contemporary Jewish Record<\/i>\u00a0in 1945 as the press organ of the American Jewish Committee. \u201cIf there is an intellectual movement in America to whose invention Jews can lay sole claim, neoconservatism is it,\u201d wrote\u00a0Gal Beckerman in the\u00a0Jewish Daily Forward<\/i><\/a>,\u00a0<\/i>January 6, 2006. \u201cIt is a fact that as a political philosophy, neoconservatism was born among the children of Jewish immigrants and is now largely the intellectual domain of those immigrants\u2019 grandchildren.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nThe founding fathers of neoconservatism (Norman Podhoretz, Irving Kristol, Donald Kagan, Paul Wolfowitz, Adam Shulsky) were self-proclaimed disciples of Leo Strauss, a German Jewish immigrant teaching at the University of Chicago. Strauss can be characterized as a meta-Zionist in the sense that, while an ardent supporter of the State of Israel, he rejected the idea that Israel as a nation should be contained within borders; Israel must retain her specificity, which is to be everywhere, he said in essence in his 1962 lecture\u00a0\u201cWhy We Remain Jews.\u201d<\/a>\u00a0Strauss would also approve of being called a Machiavellian, for in his\u00a0Thoughts on Machiavelli<\/a>,\u00a0<\/i>he praised the \u201cthe intrepidity of his thought, the grandeur of his vision, and the graceful subtlety of his speech\u201d (p. 13). Machiavelli\u2019s model of a prince was Cesar Borgia, the tyrant who after having appointed the cruel Ramiro d\u2019Orco to subdue the province of Romania, had him executed with utter cruelty, thus reaping the people\u2019s gratitude after having diverted their hatred onto another. Machiavelli, writes Strauss, \u201cis a patriot of a particular kind: He is more concerned with the salvation of his fatherland than with the salvation of his soul\u201d (p. 10). And that happens to be exactly what Jewishness is all about, according to Jewish thinkers such as Harry Waton: \u201cThe Jews that have a deeper understanding of Judaism know that the only immortality there is for the Jew is the immortality in the Jewish people\u201d (read more here<\/a>). As a matter of fact, in\u00a0the\u00a0Jewish World Review<\/i>\u00a0of June 7, 1999<\/a>, Michael Ledeen, a neocon and founding member of the\u00a0Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs<\/i>\u00a0(JINSA), assumed that Machiavelli must have been a \u201csecret Jew,\u201d since \u201cif you listen to his political philosophy you will hear Jewish music.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nThe neoconservatives of the first generation originally positioned themselves on the far left. Irving Kristol, one of the main editors of\u00a0Commentary<\/i>, had long claimed to be a Trotskyist. It was soon after the 1967 successful annexation of Arab territories by Israel that the Straussians experienced their conversion to right-wing militarism, to which they owe their new name. Norman Podhoretz, editor-in-chief from 1960 to 1995, turned from anti-war activist to defense budget booster in the early 70s. He gave the following explanation in 1979: \u201cAmerican support for Israel depended upon continued American involvement in international affairs\u2014from which it followed that an American withdrawal into the kind of isolationist mood [. . .] that now looked as though it might soon prevail again, represented a direct threat to the security of Israel.\u201d (Breaking Ranks,\u00a0<\/i>p. 336). Leading the U.S. into war for the benefit of Israel is the essence of the Machiavellian crypto-Zionists known deceptively as neoconservatives.<\/span><\/p>\nThe Project for a new (((American))) Century<\/a><\/h2>\nThe story of how the neoconservatives reached the position of influence they held under George W. Bush is a complicated one, which I can only outline. They entered the state apparatus for the first time in the baggage of Rumsfeld and Cheney, during president Ford\u2019s cabinet reshuffle known as the \u201cHalloween Massacre,\u201d following Nixon\u2019s resignation. When the Cold War calmed down after America evacuated its troops from Vietnam in 1973, and the CIA produced reassuring analyses of the USSR\u2019s military capabilities and ambitions, Rumsfeld (as Secretary of Defense) and Cheney (as Chief of Staff) persuaded Ford to appoint an independent committee, known as Team B, to revise upward the CIA estimates of the Soviet threat, and reactivate a war attitude in public opinion, Congress, and Administration. Team B was chaired by Richard Pipes and co-chaired by Paul Wolfowitz, both introduced by Richard Perle.<\/span><\/p>\nDuring the Democratic parenthesis of the Carter presidency (1976\u201380), the neoconservatives worked at unifying the largest number of Jews around their policies, by founding the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA), which became the second-most powerful pro-Israel lobby after AIPAC. According to its\u00a0\u201cmission statement\u201d<\/a>, it is \u201cdedicated to educating Congressional, military and civilian national security decision-makers on American defense and strategic interests, primarily in the Middle East, the cornerstone of which is a robust U.S.-Israeli security cooperation.\u201d In 1980, the neocons were rewarded by Ronald Reagan for their support by a dozen posts in national security and foreign policy: Richard Perle and Douglas Feith to the Department of Defense; Richard Pipes at the National Security Council; Paul Wolfowitz, Lewis \u201cScooter\u201d Libby, and Michael Ledeen in the State Department. They helped Reagan escalate the Cold War, showering billions of dollars on the military-industrial complex.<\/span><\/p>\nThe long term planning of 9\/11 probably started then. Isser Harel, founder of Israeli secret services (Shai<\/i>\u00a0in 1944,\u00a0Shin Bet<\/i>\u00a0in 1948, Mossad until 1963) is reported as prophesizing in 1980, in an interview with Christian Zionist Michael Evans, that Islamic terrorism would end up hitting America in their \u201cphallic symbol\u201d: \u201cYour biggest phallic symbol is New York City and your tallest building will be the phallic symbol they will hit\u201d.[10]<\/i><\/i><\/i><\/a>\u00a0(A whole article would be needed to document and explain the revival of the Jewish gift of apocalyptic prophecy in recent decades.)<\/span><\/p>\nIn 1996, during the Clinton years, the neoconservatives threw all their weight into their ultimate think tank, the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), directed by William Kristol and Robert Kagan. PNAC recommended taking advantage of the defeat of communism to reinforce American hegemony by preventing the emergence of any rival. Their\u00a0Statement of Principles<\/a>\u00a0<\/i>vowed to extend the current\u00a0Pax Americana<\/i>, which entailed \u201ca military that is strong and ready to meet both present and future challenges.\u201d In its September 2000 report entitled\u00a0Rebuilding America\u2019s Defenses<\/i><\/a>, PNAC anticipated that US forces must become \u201cable to rapidly deploy and win multiple simultaneous large-scale wars.\u201d This required a profound transformation, including the development of \u201ca new family of nuclear weapons designed to address new sets of military requirements.\u201d Unfortunately, according to the authors of the report, \u201cthe process of transformation [\u2026] is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event\u2014like a new Pearl Harbor.\u201d It is certainly no coincidence that the three-hour-long blockbuster\u00a0Pearl Harbor\u00a0<\/i>was released in the summer 2001, conveniently entrenching the \u201cNew Pearl Harbor\u201d meme into the minds of millions.<\/span><\/p>\nPNAC\u2019s architects played the American hegemony card by draping themselves in the super-patriotic discourse of America\u2019s civilizing mission. But their duplicity is exposed in a document brought to public knowledge in 2008: a report published in 1996 by the Israeli think tank Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies (IASPS), entitled\u00a0A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm<\/a>,\u00a0<\/i>written specifically for the new Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu. The team responsible for the report was led by Richard Perle, and included Douglas Feith and David Wurmser, who figured the same year among the signatories of PNAC. As its title suggests, the\u00a0Clean Break<\/i>\u00a0report invited Netanyahu to break with the Oslo Accords of 1993, which officially committed Israel to the return of the territories it occupied illegally since 1967. The new prime minister should instead \u201cengage every possible energy on rebuilding Zionism\u201d and reaffirm Israel\u2019s right to the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.<\/span><\/p>\nIn November 2000, Bush Jr. was elected under conditions that raised protests of electoral fraud. Dick Cheney, who had directed his campaign, named himself vice-president and introduced two dozens neoconservatives in foreign policy key positions. The State Department was entrusted to Colin Powell, but he was surrounded with neocon aides such as David Wurmser. As National Security Adviser, Condoleezza Rice, a specialist of Russia with no expertise in the Middle East, was entirely dependent on her neocon adviser Philip Zelikow. William Luti and Elliott Abrams, and later Eliot Cohen, were also tasked with steering Rice. But it was mainly from within the Defense Department under Donald Rumsfeld that the most influential neocons were able to fashion US foreign and military policy. Richard Perle occupied the crucial position of director of the Defense Policy Board, responsible for defining military strategy, while Paul Wolfowitz became the \u201csoul of the Pentagon\u201d as deputy secretary with Douglas Feith as undersecretary.<\/span><\/p>\nThe Hanukkah miracle to start WWIV<\/a><\/h2>\nAfter eight months in the presidency, Bush was confronted with the \u201ccatastrophic event,\u201d the \u201cnew Pearl Harbor\u201d that PNAC had wished for a year earlier. 9\/11 was a real\u00a0\u201cHanukkah miracle\u201d<\/a>\u00a0for Israel, commented Mossad chief Ephraim Halevy and Israeli National Security Council chairman Uzi Dayan.\u00a0Netanyahu rejoiced: \u201cIt\u2019s very good<\/a>\u00a0[\u2026] it will generate immediate sympathy [\u2026], strengthen the bond between our two peoples, because we\u2019ve experienced terror over so many decades, but the United States has now experienced a massive hemorrhaging of terror.\u201d On September 21, he published an op-ed in the\u00a0New York Post<\/i>\u00a0entitled \u201cToday, We Are All Americans,\u201d in which he delivered his favorite propaganda line: \u201cFor the bin Ladens of the world, Israel is merely a sideshow. America is the target.\u201d Three days later the\u00a0New Republic<\/i>\u00a0responded with a headline on behalf of the Americans: \u201cWe are all Israelis now.\u201d Americans experienced 9\/11 as an act of hatred from the Arab world, and they felt an immediate sympathy for Israel, which the neoconservatives relentlessly exploited. One of the aims was to encourage Americans to view Israel\u2019s oppression of the Palestinians as part of the global fight against Islamic terrorism.<\/span><\/p>\nIt was a great success. In the years preceding September 11, Israel\u2019s reputation had bottomed out; condemnations had been raining from around the world for its policy of apartheid and colonization, and its systematic war against Palestinian command structures. Increasing numbers of American voices questioned the merits of the special relationship between the United States and Israel. From the day of the attacks, it was all over. As Americans now intended to fight Arab terrorists to the death, they would stop demanding from Israel more reasonable, proportionate retaliation against Palestinian suicide bombers and rockets.<\/span><\/p>\nInstead, the president\u2019s speeches (written by neocon David Frum) characterized the 9\/11 attacks as the trigger for a world war of a new type, one fought against an invisible enemy scattered throughout the Middle East. First, vengeance must come not only against bin Laden, but also against the state harboring him: \u201cWe will make no distinction between those who committed these acts and those who harbor them\u201d (Sept. 11). Second, the war extends to the world: \u201cOur war on terror begins with Al Qaeda, but it does not end there. It will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped and defeated\u201d (Sept. 20). Third, any country that does not support Washington will be treated as an enemy: \u201cEither you are with us, or you are with the terrorists\u201d (Sept. 20).<\/span><\/p>\nIn an article in the\u00a0Wall Street Journal<\/i>\u00a0dated November 20, 2001, the neoconservative Eliot Cohen dubbed the war against terrorism as \u201cWorld War IV,\u201d a framing soon echoed by other American Zionists (the odd choice of the name WWIV rather than WWIII comes, I suspect, from the neocons\u2019 ethnocentric worldview, in which every world war is a step toward Greater Israel; since one major step was accomplished in 1967, the Cold War counts as WW3). In September 2004, at a conference in Washington entitled \u201cWorld War IV: Why We Fight, Whom We Fight, How We Fight,\u201d Cohen said: \u201cThe enemy in this war is not \u2018terrorism\u2019 [\u2026] but militant Islam.\u201d Like the Cold War, the imminent world war, according to Cohen\u2019s vision, has ideological roots, will have global implications, and will last a long time, involving a whole range of conflicts. The self-fulfilling prophecy of a new World War centered in the Middle East has also been popularized by Norman Podhoretz, in \u201cHow to Win World War IV\u201d (Commentary,<\/i>\u00a0February 2002), followed by a second article in, \u201cWorld War IV: How It Started, What It Means, and Why We Have to Win,\u201d (September 2004), and finally a book titled\u00a0World War IV: The Long Struggle Against Islamofascism\u00a0<\/i>(2007).[11]<\/i><\/a><\/span><\/p>\nThe hijacked conspiracy and the controlled opposition<\/a><\/h2>\nIn the case of 9\/11 as in the case of Kennedy, controlled opposition operates on many levels, and many honest scholars now realize that the 9\/11 Truth movement itself is partly channeled by individuals and groups secretly aiming at drawing suspicions away from Israel. Such is certainly the case of the three young Jews (Avery, Rowe, and Bermas) who directed the film\u00a0Loose Change<\/i>\u00a0(2005), the most widely watched 9\/11 conspiracy film since its first version in 2005. They hitched their whole thesis on a comparison with the never carried-out false flag project Operation Northwoods (timely revealed to the public in May 2001 in\u00a0James Bamford<\/a>\u2019s book\u00a0Body of Secrets<\/i>, written with the support of former NSA director Michael Hayden, now working for Michael Chertoff), but they failed to mention the attack on the USS Liberty, a well-documented false flag attack by Israel on its U.S. ally. They did not breathe a word about the neoconservatives\u2019 loyalty to Israel, and treat anyone who cited the Israeli role in 9\/11 as anti-Semitic. The same can be said of Bermas\u2019s more recent film\u00a0Invisible Empire<\/a>\u00a0<\/i>(2010), also produced by Alex Jones: a compilation of anti-imperialist clich\u00e9s focusing on the Bushes and the Rockefellers, without a single hint of the (((Others))).<\/span><\/p>\nIt is interesting to note that the 9\/11 scenario put forward by\u00a0Loose Change<\/i>\u00a0had actually been prewritten by Hollywood: on the 4th<\/sup>\u00a0of March, 2001,\u00a0Fox TV broadcast the first episode of the series\u00a0The Lone Gunmen<\/i><\/a>,\u00a0<\/i>watched by 13 million Americans. The plot is about computer hackers working for a secret cabal within the U.S. government, who hijack a jet by remote control with the intent to crash it into one of the Twin Towers, while making it appear to have been hijacked by Islamic terrorists. At the last seconds, the pilots manage to regain control of the plane. The purpose of the failed operation was to trigger a world war under the pretext of fighting terrorism. Truthers of the \u201cinside job\u201d school fancy that this episode must have been written by some whistleblower inside Fox. Unlikely!<\/span><\/p>\nThere is, of course, some truth in the \u201cinside job\u201d theory, as I said at the beginning. Israel (in the wider sense) would not be able to pull such an operation and get away with it, without complicity at the highest level of U.S. government. How does that work? Pretty much like for the\u00a0Kennedy assassination<\/a>, if you consider that the country was then ruled by its vice-president Dick Cheney, the president being a mere dummy (see Lou Dubose and Jake Bernstein,\u00a0Vice: Dick Cheney and the Hijacking of the American Presidency,\u00a0<\/i>Random House, 2006). In my book\u00a0JFK-9\/11<\/a>,<\/i>\u00a0I have proposed a plausible scenario of how Israel had in fact hijacked a smaller false flag attack on the Pentagon fabricated by the American Deep State, for the limited purpose of justifying the overthrow of the Talibans in Afghanistan, a goal fully supported by such \u201cGreat Gamers\u201d as Zbigniew Brzezinski, but which didn\u2019t in itself interest the neocons.<\/span><\/p>\nWhat the neocons wanted was a new war against Iraq and then a general conflagration in the Middle East leading to the crumbling of all the enemies of Israel, with Syria and Iran high on the list. So they outbid everyone and gave the operation the scale they wanted with the help of their New York super-sayan\u00a0<\/i>Silvertein. George W. Bush, Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice, and other goyim who had been kept out of the loop, finding themselves embroiled in geopolitical machinations of global scope, could merely try to save face. On September 19 and 20, Richard Perle\u2019s Defense Policy Board met in the company of Paul Wolfowitz and Bernard Lewis (inventor of the self-fulfilling prophecy of the \u201cclash of civilizations\u201d) but in the absence of Powell and Rice. They prepared a letter to Bush, written on PNAC letterhead, to remind him of his historic mission: \u201cEven if evidence does not link Iraq directly to the attack, any strategy aiming at the eradication of terrorism and its sponsors must include a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq. Failure to undertake such an effort will constitute an early and perhaps decisive surrender in the war on international terrorism.\u201d[12]<\/i><\/a>\u00a0This was an ultimatum. Bush was certainly aware of the leverage that the neocons had acquired over the major print and television media. He was obliged, under penalty of ending in the proverbial trash bin of history, to endorse the invasion of Iraq that his father had refused the Zionists ten years earlier.<\/span><\/p>\nAs for Brzezinski and other genuine U.S. imperialists, their support for the invasion of Afghanistan made their timid protests against the Iraq war ineffective. It was a little late in February 2007 when Brzezinski denounced before the Senate \u201ca historical, strategic and moral calamity [\u2026] driven by Manichaean impulses and imperial hubris.\u201d In 2012 he declared, regarding the risk of conflagration with Iran, that Obama should\u00a0stop following Israel like a \u201cstupid mule.\u201d<\/a>\u00a0He soon disappeared from the MSM, as a useful idiot no longer useful.<\/span><\/p>\nThe \u201chalf truth\u201d of the exclusively \u201cinside job\u201d theory, which denounces 9\/11 as a false flag operation perpetrated by the American state on its own citizens, functions like a secondary false flag hiding the real masters of the operation, who are in fact agents in the service of a foreign nation. One of the aims of this inside-jobish controlled opposition is to force American officials to maintain the \u201cbin Laden did it\u201d masquerade, knowing that tearing apart the fake Islamic flag would only reveal the U.S. flag, not the Israeli flag. No longer controlling the media, they would not have the means to raise this second veil to expose Israel. Any effort to get at the truth would be political suicide. Everyone understands what is at stake: if one day, under mounting pressure from public opinion or for some other strategic reason, the mainstream media abandons the official bin Laden story, the well-rehearsed slogan \u201c9\/11 was an inside job\u201d will have prepared Americans to turn against their own government, while the neocon Zionists will remain untouchable (Machiavelli\u2019s method: make another accomplish your dirty ends, then turn popular vengeance against him). And God knows what will happen, if the government has not by then succeeded in disarming its citizens through Sandy Hook-type psy-ops. Government officials have little choice but to stick to the Al-Qaeda story, at least for the next fifty years.<\/span><\/p>\nAfter reaching this conclusion in\u00a0JFK-9\/11<\/i>, I had the satisfaction of finding that Victor Thorn, in a book that had eluded me (Made in Israel: 9-11 and the Jewish Plot Against America,\u00a0<\/i>Sisyphus Press, 2011<\/a>), had already expressed it in harsher terms: \u201cIn essence, the \u20189-11 truth movement\u2019 was created\u00a0prior\u00a0<\/i>to Sept. 11, 2001 as a means of suppressing news relating to Israeli complicity. By 2002\u20132003, \u2018truthers\u2019 began appearing at rallies holding placards that read \u20189-11 was an inside job.\u2019 Initially, these signs provided hope for those who didn\u2019t believe the government and mainstream media\u2019s absurd cover stories. But then an awful realization emerged: The slogan \u20189-11 was an inside job\u2019 was quite possibly the greatest example of Israeli propaganda ever devised. [\u2026] The mantra, \u20189-11 was an inside job\u2019 is only partially true and is inherently damaging to the \u2018truth movement\u2019 because it shifts all attention away from Israel\u2019s traitorous assault against America. [\u2026] Leaders of these fake 9-11 groups know the truth about Israel\u2019s 9-11 barbarity. Their willingness to perpetuate or cover it up ultimately makes them as guilty and vile as those who launched the attacks. There are no degrees of separation in this matter. It\u2019s a black-and-white issue. Tell the entire truth about Israel\u2019s Murder, Inc. cabal, or sleep in the same infected bed as these murdering dogs lie in. [\u2026] Faux conspiratologists complain about the government and news sources not telling the truth, yet they\u2019ve erected an utter blackout on data regarding Israel and 9-11.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nThe missing .3 trillion<\/a><\/h2>\nSome readers will complain that I am making a very complex operation appear too simple. I plead guilty: I have merely tried here to outline the case against Israel in the short scope of an article. But I am fully aware that creating Greater Israel through a world war fought by the U.S. might not have been the only consideration in the preparation of 9\/11. Many private interests had to be involved. Yet I believe none of them interfered with Israel\u2019s plan, and most of them supported it.<\/span><\/p>\nThere is, for example, the\u00a0missing gold in the WTC basement<\/a>\u00a0: $200 million were recovered from the estimated $1 billion stored: who took the rest? But that is nothing compared to the $2.3 trillion that were missing from the accounts of the Department of Defense for the year 2000, in addition to $1.1 trillion missing for 1999, according to a televised declaration made on September 10th<\/sup>, 2001, the day before the attacks, by Donald Rumsfeld. Just for comparison, this is more than one thousand times the colossal losses of Enron, which triggered a chain of bankruptcies that same year. All this money evaporated into thin air under the watch of William Cohen, Defense Secretary during Bill Clinton\u2019s second term. In 2001, the man who was tasked to help track down the missing trillions was Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) Dov Zakheim, a member of PNAC and an ordained rabbi. Practically, the mystery had to be resolved by financial analysts at Resource Services Washington (RSW). Unfortunately, their offices were destroyed by \u201cal-Qaeda\u201d the following morning. The \u201chijackers\u201d or Flight AA77, rather than hitting the command center on the eastern side of the Pentagon, chose to attempt a theoretically impossible downward spiral at 180 degrees in order to hit the west side of the building precisely at the location of the accounting offices. The 34 experts at RSW perished in their offices, together with 12 other financial analysts, as is noted in the biography of the team leader Robert Russell for the\u00a0National 9\/11 Pentagon Memorial<\/a>: \u201cThe weekend before his death, his entire office attended a crab feast at the Russell home. They were celebrating the end of the fiscal-year budget completion. Tragically, every person that attended that party was involved in the Pentagon explosion, and are currently missing\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\nBy an incredible coincidence, one of the financial experts trying to make sense of the Pentagon financial loss, Bryan Jack, was reported to have died at the precise location of his office, not because he was working there that day, but because he was on a business trip on Flight AA77. In the words of the\u00a0Washington Post<\/i>\u00a0database<\/a>: \u201cBryan C. Jack was responsible for crunching America\u2019s defense budget. He was a passenger on American Airlines Flight 77, bound for official business in California when his plane struck the Pentagon, where, on any other day, Jack would have been at work at his computer\u201d. Yahweh must have a sense of chutzpah!<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n
Laurent Guy\u00e9not is the author of\u00a0JFK-9\/11: 50 years of Deep State<\/i>, Progressive Press, 2014<\/a>, and\u00a0From Yahweh to Zion: Jealous God, Chosen People, Promised Land \u2026 Clash of Civilizations<\/i><\/a>, 2018. (or $30 shipping included from Sifting and Winnowing, POB 221, Lone Rock, WI 53556).<\/span><\/p>\n
How America was neoconned into World War IV<\/em><\/h3>\nLAURENT GUY\u00c9NOT
\nThe Unz Review<\/p>\n
Technical impossibilities<\/a><\/h2>\nThanks to courageous investigators, many anomalies in the official explanation of the events of 9\/11 were posted on the Internet in the following months, providing evidence that this was a false flag operation, and that Osama bin Laden was innocent, as he repeatedly declared in the Afghan and Pakistani press and on Al Jazeera.[1]<\/i><\/a>\u00a0The proofs of this appalling fraud have been accumulating ever since, and are now accessible to anyone willing to spend a few hours of research on the Web. (Although, while preparing this article, I noticed that Google is now making access to that research more difficult than it was five years ago, artificially prioritizing anti-conspiracy sites.)<\/span><\/p>\nFor example, members of\u00a0Architects and Engineers for 9\/11 Truth<\/a>\u00a0have demonstrated that it was impossible for plane crashes and jet fuel fires to trigger the collapse of the Twin Towers. Even\u00a0Donald Trump understood this<\/a>. In fact, speaking of \u201ccollapse\u201d is perhaps misleading: the towers literally exploded, pulverizing concrete and projecting pieces of steel beams weighing several hundred tons hundreds of meters laterally at high speeds. The\u00a0pyroclastic dust<\/a>\u00a0that immediately flooded through the streets, not unlike the dust from a volcano, indicates a high temperature mixture of hot gasses and relatively dense solid particles, an impossible phenomenon in a simple collapse. It is also impossible that\u00a0WTC7<\/a>, another skyscraper (47 stories), which had not been hit by a plane, collapsed into its own footprint at near free-fall speed, unless by \u201ccontrolled demolition.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nTestimonies of firefighters<\/a>\u00a0recorded shortly after the events describe sequences of explosions just before the \u201ccollapse\u201d, well below the plane impact. The presence of molten metal in the wreckage up to three weeks after the attack is inexplicable except by the presence of incompletely burned explosives. Firefighter Philip Ruvolo testified before \u00c9tienne Sauret\u2019s camera for his film\u00a0Collateral Damages<\/i><\/a>\u00a0(2011): \u201cYou\u2019d get down below and you\u2019d see molten steel\u2014molten steel running down the channelways, like you were in a foundry\u2014like lava.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nAviation professionals<\/a>\u00a0have also reported impossibilities in the behavior of the planes. The charted speeds of the two aircraft hitting the Twin Towers, 443 mph and 542 mph, exclude these aircraft being Boeing 767s, because these speeds are virtually impossible near ground level. In the unlikely event such speeds could be attained without the aircraft falling apart, flying them accurately into the towers was mission impossible, especially by the amateur pilots blamed for the hijacking.\u00a0Hosni Mubarak, a former pilot, said he could never do it<\/a>. (He is not the only head of state to have voiced his doubts:\u00a0Chavez<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0Ahmadinejad<\/a>\u00a0are among them.) Recall that neither of the black boxes of the jetliners was ever found, an incomprehensible situation.<\/span><\/p>\nAnd of course, there are the obvious anomalies of Shanksville and Pentagon crash sites: no plane or credible plane debris can be seen on any of the numerous photos easily available.<\/span><\/p>\nInside Job or Mossad Job?<\/a><\/h2>\nAmong the growing number of Americans who disbelieve the official version of the 9\/11 attacks, two basic theories are in competition: I called them \u201cinside job\u201d and \u201cMossad job\u201d. The first one is the dominant thesis within the so-called 9\/11 Truth movement, and blames the American government, or a faction within the American Deep State. The second one claims that the masterminds were members of a powerful Israeli network deeply infiltrated in all spheres of power within the US, including media, government, military and secret services.<\/span><\/p>\nThis \u201cMossad job\u201d thesis has been gaining ground since Alan Sabrosky, a professor at the U.S. Army War College and the U.S. Military Academy, published in July 2012\u00a0an article entitled \u201cDemystifying 9\/11: Israel and the Tactics of Mistake\u201d<\/a>, where he voiced his conviction that September 11th<\/sup>\u00a0was \u201ca classic Mossad-orchestrated operation.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nWe can notice from the outset that incriminating Israelis or Arabs are both \u201coutside job\u201d theories (in fact, they are mirror images of each other, which is understandable in light of what Gilad Atzmon explains about Jewish \u201cprojected guilt\u201d).[2]<\/i><\/i><\/a>\u00a0Before even looking at the evidence, \u201coutside job\u201d sounds more credible that \u201cinside job\u201d. There is something monstrous in the idea that a government can deceive and terrorize its own citizens by killing thousands of them, just for starting a series of wars that are not even in the nation\u2019s interest. By comparison, a foreign power attacking the U.S. under the false flag of a third power almost seems like fair play. Indeed suspicion of Israel\u2019s role should be natural to anyone aware of the reputation of the Mossad as: \u201cWildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian\/Arab act,\u201d in the words of a report of the U.S. Army School for Advanced Military Studies\u00a0quoted by the\u00a0<\/a>Washington Times<\/i>, September 10th<\/sup>, 2001<\/a>\u00a0\u2014 the day before the attacks.<\/span><\/p>\nThis is an important point, because it raises the question of how and why the 9\/11 Truth movement has been led to endorse massively the outrageous \u201cinside job\u201d thesis without even considering the more likely thesis of an attack by a foreign power acting under an Islamic false flag\u2014and what foreign power but Israel would do that?<\/span><\/p>\nOf course, the two dissenting theses do not necessarily exclude each other; at least, no one incriminating Israel denies that corrupted elements from the American administration or deep state were involved. The\u00a0\u201cpassionate attachment\u201d<\/a>\u00a0between Israel and the U.S. has been going on for decades, and 9\/11 is one of its monstrous offsprings.<\/span><\/p>\nI can think of no better symbol of that reality than the marriage of\u00a0Ted and Barbara Olson<\/a>. Ted Oslon, after having defended Bush in the disputed 2000 election, had been rewarded with the post of Solicitor General (he also defended Dick Cheney when he refused to submit to Congress Enron-related documents). Barbara was a famous CNN reporter, but before that, she was born Barbara Kay Bracher of Jewish parents, educated at Yeshiva University School of Law, and hired by the legal firm WilmerHale, of which Jamie Gorelick, a future member of the 9\/11 Commission, was also a member, and whose clients include powerful Israeli firms like Amdocs, a digital communication company charged with\u00a0spying for Israel in the United States<\/a>. On September 11, 2001, Barbara Olson allegedly was on flight AA77, from which she made two telephone calls to her husband. Her calls were reported on CNN in the afternoon, and contributed to crystallize some details of the official story, such as the \u201cbox cutters\u201d used as only weapons by the hijackers. Repeatedly invited on television shows after 9\/11, Ted Olson frequently contradicted himself when questioned about the calls from his wife. In a 2006 report, the FBI identified only one call from Barbara Olson, and it was an unconnected call lasting 0 seconds. Like all other reported phone calls from desperate passengers (including the famous \u201cHi, Mom. This is Mark Bingham\u201d), Barbara\u2019s call was simply impossible, because the technology required to make high-altitude phone calls was not developed until 2004.[3]<\/i><\/i><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n9\/11 was made possible by an alliance between secret worshippers of Israel and corrupted American elements. The question is: who, of the two, were the masterminds of this incredibly daring and complex operation, and for what \u201chigher purpose\u201d?<\/span><\/p>\nAnother question is: why do those who keep repeating as a mantra\u00a0\u201c9\/11 was an inside job\u201d\u00a0<\/i>ignore totally the compelling evidence pointing to Israel? In other words, to what extent do they constitute a \u201ccontrolled opposition\u201d intended to cover up for Israel? Asking this type of question does not mean suspecting anyone who defends an erroneous or incomplete theory of being a hypocrite. Most people defending one theory or the other do so sincerely, based on the information to which they have access. I have myself been a believer in the official theory for 7 years, and in the \u201cinside job\u201d theory for 2 years, before progressively moving on to the present argument from 2010. On the other hand, we can assume that those who lead the public into error on a long term are not just mistaken but lying. In any case, it is legitimate to investigate the background of opinion makers, and when they are caught lying or distorting the truth, we can speculate on their motivation. I will come back to this issue at the end of the article.<\/span><\/p>\nThe dancing Israelis<\/a><\/h2>\nResearchers who believe Israel orchestrated 9\/11 cite the behavior of a group of individuals who have come to be known as the \u201cdancing Israelis\u201d since their arrest, though their aim was to pass as \u201cdancing Arabs.\u201d Dressed in ostensibly \u201cMiddle Eastern\u201d attire, they were seen by various witnesses standing on the roof of a van parked in Jersey City, cheering and taking photos of each other with the WTC in the background, at the very moment the first plane hit the North Tower. The suspects then moved their van to another parking spot in Jersey City, where other witnesses saw them deliver the same ostentatious celebrations.<\/span><\/p>\nOne anonymous call to the police in Jersey City, reported the same day by\u00a0NBC News,\u00a0<\/i>mentioned \u201ca white van, 2 or 3 guys in there. They look like Palestinians and going around a building. [\u2026] I see the guy by Newark Airport mixing some junk and he has those sheikh uniforms. [\u2026] He\u2019s dressed like an Arab.\u201d The police soon issued the following BOLO alert (be-on-the-look-out) for a \u201cVehicle possibly related to New York terrorist attack. White, 2000 Chevrolet van with New Jersey registration with \u2018Urban Moving Systems\u2019 sign on back seen at Liberty State Park, Jersey City, NJ, at the time of first impact of jetliner into World Trade Center. Three individuals with van were seen celebrating after initial impact and subsequent explosion.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nBy chance, the van was intercepted around 4 pm, with five young men inside: Sivan and Paul Kurzberg, Yaron Shmuel, Oded Ellner, and Omer Marmari. Before any question was asked, the driver, Sivan Kurzberg, burst out: \u201cWe are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are your problem\u201d.The Kurzberg brothers were formally identified as Mossad agents. All five officially worked for a moving company (a classic cover for espionage) named Urban Moving Systems, whose owner, Dominik Otto Suter, fled the country for Tel Aviv on September 14.[4]<\/i><\/a><\/span><\/p>\nThis event was first reported the day after the attacks by journalist\u00a0Paulo Lima in the New Jersey newspaper\u00a0<\/a>The Bergen Record<\/i><\/a>, based on \u201csources close to the investigation\u201d who were convinced of the suspects\u2019 foreknowledge of the morning\u2019s attacks: \u201cIt looked like they knew what was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park\u201d.The 579-page\u00a0FBI report on the investigation<\/a>\u00a0that followed (partially declassified in 2005) reveals several important facts. First, once developed, the photos taken by the suspects while watching the North Tower on fire confirm their attitudes of celebration: \u201cThey smiled, they hugged each other and they appeared to \u2018high five\u2019 one another\u201d. To explain their contentment, the suspects said they were simply happy that, thanks to these terrorist attacks, \u201cthe United States will take steps to stop terrorism in the world\u201d. Yet at this point, before the second tower was hit, most Americans believed the crash was an accident. The five Israelis were found connected to another company called Classic International Movers, which employed five other Israelis arrested for their contacts with the nineteen presumed suicide hijackers. In addition, one of the five suspects had called \u201can individual in South America with authentic ties to Islamic militants in the middle east\u201d. Finally, the FBI report states that the \u201cThe vehicle was also searched by a trained bomb-sniffing dog which yielded a positive result for the presence of explosive traces\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\nAfter all this incriminating evidence comes the most puzzling passage of the report: its conclusion that \u201cthe FBI no longer has any investigative interests in the detainees and they should proceed with the appropriate immigration proceedings\u201d. In fact, a letter addressed to the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service, dated September 25, 2001, proves that, less than two weeks after the events, the FBI federal headquarter had already decided to close the investigation, asking that \u201cThe U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service should proceed with the appropriate immigration proceedings\u201d. The five \u201cdancing Israelis\u201d, also known as \u201cthe high fivers\u201d,<\/i>\u00a0were detained 71 days in a Brooklyn prison, where they first refused, then failed, lie detector tests. Finally, they were quietly returned to Israel under the minimal charge of \u201cvisa violation.\u201d Three of them were then invited on an Israeli TV talk show in November 2001, where one of them ingenuously declared:\u00a0\u201cOur purpose was simply to document the event.\u201d<\/a><\/span><\/p>\nThe Israeli spy network<\/a><\/h2>\nThe five \u201cdancing Israelis,\u201d the only suspects arrested on the very day of the 9\/11 attacks, were just the tip of an iceberg. In September 2001, the federal police were busy dismantling the largest Israeli spy network ever uncovered on American soil. In the summer preceding the attack, the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) compiled a report which would be revealed to the public by the\u00a0Washington Post<\/i>\u00a0on November 23rd<\/sup>, 2001, followed by a\u00a0Carl Cameron\u2019s four-part documentary broadcast on Fox News<\/a>\u00a0from December 11th<\/sup>, 2001. On March 14th<\/sup>, 2002, an article in French newspaper\u00a0Le Monde<\/i>\u00a0signed by Sylvain Cypel also referred to the report, shortly before the French magazine\u00a0Intelligence Online<\/i>\u00a0made it\u00a0fully accessible on the Internet<\/a>.[5]<\/i><\/a>It said that 140 Israeli spies, aged between 20 and 30, had been arrested since March 2001, while 60 more were arrested after September 11. Generally posing as art students, they visited at least \u201c36 sensitive sites of the Department of Defense.\u201d \u201cA majority of those questioned have stated they served in military intelligence, electronic signal intercept, or explosive ordnance units. Some have been linked to high-ranking officials in the Israeli military. One was the son of a two-star general, one served as the bodyguard to the head of the Israeli Army, one served in a Patriot mission unit.\u201d Another, Peer Segalovitz, officer in the 605 Battalion of the Golan Heights, \u201cacknowledged he could blow up buildings, bridges, cars, and anything else that he needed to.\u201d[6]<\/i><\/a><\/span><\/p>\nOf special interest is the mention that \u201cthe Hollywood, Florida, area seems to be a central point for these individuals.\u201d[7]<\/i><\/a>\u00a0More than 30 out of the 140 fake Israeli students identified before 9\/11 lived in that city of 140,000 inhabitants. And this city also happens to be the place where fifteen of the nineteen alleged 9\/11 Islamist hijackers had regrouped (nine in Hollywood, six in the vicinity), including four of the five supposed to have hijacked Flight AA11. What was the relationship between the Israeli spies and the Islamist terrorists? We were told by\u00a0mainstream news<\/a>\u00a0that the former were monitoring the latter, but failed to report suspicious activities of these terrorists to American authorities. From such a presentation, Israel comes out clean, since a spy agency cannot be blamed for not sharing information with the country it is spying in. At worst, the Israeli Intelligence can be accused of \u201cletting it happen\u201d\u2014a guarantee of impunity. In reality, the Israeli agents were certainly not just monitoring the future \u201chijackers,\u201d but financing and manipulating them, before disposing of them. We know that Israeli Hanan Serfaty, who rented two flats near Mohamed Atta, had handled at least $100,000 in three months. And we also learned from the\u00a0New York Times<\/i>\u00a0on February 19, 2009<\/a>, that Ali al-Jarrah, cousin of the alleged hijacker of Flight UA93 Ziad al-Jarrah, had spent twenty-five years spying for the Mossad as an undercover agent infiltrating the Palestinian resistance and Hezbollah.<\/span><\/p>\nIsraeli agents apparently appreciate operating under the cover of artists. Shortly before September 11, a group of fourteen Jewish \u201cartists\u201d under the name of\u00a0Gelatin<\/a>\u00a0installed themselves on the ninety-first floor of the north tower of the World Trade Center. There, as a work of \u201cstreet art,\u201d they removed a window and extended a wooden balcony. To understand what role this piece of scaffolding may have played, it must be remembered that the explosion supposedly resulting from the impact of the Boeing AA11 on the North Tower took place between the ninety-second and the ninety-eighth floors. With the only film of the impact on the North Tower being that of the Naudet brothers, who are under suspicion for numerous reasons, many researchers are convinced that no aircraft hit this tower, and that the explosion simulating the impact was provoked by pre-planted explosives inside the tower.<\/span><\/p>\nFloors ninety-three to one hundred of the North Tower were occupied by Marsh & McLennan, whose CEO was Jeffrey Greenberg, son of wealthy Zionist (and financier of George W. Bush) Maurice Greenberg, who also happens to be the owner of Kroll Inc., the firm in charge of security for the entire World Trade Center complex on 9\/11. The Greenbergs were also the insurers of the Twin Towers and, on July 24, 2001, they took the precaution of having the contract reinsured by competitors. In November 2000, the board of directors of Marsh & McLennan was joined by (Lewis) Paul Bremer, the chairman of the National Commission on Terrorism, who, on September 11, 2001, two hours only after the pulverization of the North Tower, would\u00a0appear on NBC to name bin Laden as prime suspect<\/a>, perfectly calm as 400 of his employees are missing (295 will finally be declared dead). \u201cIt is the day that will change our lives,\u201d he said. \u201cIt is the day when the war that the terrorists declared on the US [. . .] has been brought home to the US.\u201d In 2003, Bremer would be appointed administrator of the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq to level the Iraqi state to the ground and oversee the theft of almost a trillion dollars intended for its reconstruction.<\/span><\/p>\nThe super-sayanim<\/a><\/h2>\nWith Goldberg and Bremer, we have reached the upper level of the conspiracy, comprising a number of influential Jewish personalities, working inside and outside the U.S. government \u2014 super-sayanim<\/i>, so to speak. The most representative of those outside government is Larry Silverstein, the real estate shark who, with his partner Frank Lowy, leased the Twin Towers from New York City in the spring of 2001. The head of the New York Port Authority, who granted Silverstein and Lowy the lease, was none other than Lewis Eisenberg, another member of the United Jewish Appeal Federation and former vice-president of AIPAC. It appeared that Silverstein had made a disastrous deal, because\u00a0the Twin Towers had to be decontaminated for asbestos<\/a>. The decontamination process had been indefinitely postponed since the 1980s because of its cost, estimated at nearly $1 billion in 1989. In 2001, the New York Port Authority had been all too happy to shift responsibility to Silverstein.<\/span><\/p>\nImmediately after acquiring the Twin Towers, Silverstein renegotiated the insurance contracts to cover terrorist attacks, doubling the coverage to $3.5 billion, and made sure he would retain the right to rebuild after such an event. After the attacks, he took his insurers to court in order to receive double compensation, claiming that the two planes were two separate attacks. After a long legal battle,\u00a0he pocketed $4.5 billion<\/a>. Silverstein is a leading member of the United Jewish Appeal Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York, the biggest fundraiser for Israel (after the US government, which pays about $3 billion per year in aid to Israel). Silverstein also maintained \u201cclose ties with Netanyahu,\u201d according to\u00a0Haaretz\u00a0<\/i>(November 21, 2001)<\/a>: \u201cThe two have been on friendly terms since Netanyahu\u2019s stint as Israel\u2019s ambassador to the United Nations. For years they kept in close touch. Every Sunday afternoon, New York time, Netanyahu would call Silverstein.\u201d Besides being a powerful man, Larry is a lucky man:\u00a0as he explained in this interview<\/a>, every morning of the week, he had breakfast at the\u00a0Windows on the World<\/i>\u00a0on top of the North Tower, but on September 11th, he had an appointment with his dermatologist.<\/span><\/p>\nAccomplices to the 9\/11 false flag attack with strong Israeli connections should also be tracked at the other end of the trajectory of the planes reported to have crashed into the Twin Towers. Flights AA11 and UA175 took off from Logan Airport in Boston, which subcontracted their security to International Consultants on Targeted Security\u00a0(ICTS), a firm based in Israel and headed by Menachem Atzmon<\/a>, a treasurer of the Likud. So did Newark Airport where flight UA93 reportedly took off before crashing in Shanksville.<\/span><\/p>\nA serious investigation would follow many other trails, such as the Odigo instant messages received by employees at the WTC two hours before the plane crashes, as reported by\u00a0Haaretz<\/a>\u00a0<\/i>on September 27th<\/sup>, 2001. The first plane hit the WTC at the precise time announced,\u00a0\u201calmost to the minute,\u201d<\/a>\u00a0admitted Alex Diamandis, vice-president of Odigo, headquartered in Israel. Also disturbing is the behavior of the American branch of\u00a0Zim Israel Navigational,<\/i>\u00a0a maritime shipping giant 48% owned by the Jewish state (occasionally used as a cover for the Israeli secret services), which moved its offices from the WTC, along with its 200 employees, September 4th<\/sup>, 2001, one week before the attacks \u2014\u201clike an act of God, we moved\u201d,\u00a0<\/i>said the CEO Shaul Cohen-Mintz when\u00a0interviewed by\u00a0<\/a>USA Today<\/i>, November 17th<\/sup>, 2001<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\nBut of course, none of these trails were ever pursued. That is because the most powerful conspirators were at the highest level of the Justice Department. Michael Chertoff was head of the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice in 2001, and responsible, among many other things, for securing the release of the Israeli agents arrested before and after 9\/11, including the \u201cdancing Israelis.\u201d In 2003, this son of a rabbi and of a Mossad pioneer would be appointed Secretary of Homeland Security, in charge of counter-terrorism on the American soil, which allowed him to control dissenting citizens and restrain access to the evidence under the pretext of Sensitive Security Information.<\/span><\/p>\nAnother chief of the cover-up was Philip Zelikow, the executive director of the 9\/11 presidential Commission established in November 2002. Zelikow is a self-styled specialist in the art of making \u201cpublic myths\u201d by \u201c\u2018searing\u2019 or \u2018molding\u2019 events [that] take on \u2018transcendent\u2019 importance and, therefore, retain their power even as the experiencing generation passes from the scene\u201d (Wikipedia<\/a>). In December 1998, he co-signed an article for\u00a0Foreign Affairs<\/i>\u00a0entitled \u201cCatastrophic Terrorism,\u201d<\/a>\u00a0in which he speculated on what would have happened if the 1993 WTC bombing (already attributed to bin Laden) had been done with a nuclear bomb: \u201cAn act of catastrophic terrorism that killed thousands or tens of thousands of people and\/or disrupted the necessities of life for hundreds of thousands, or even millions, would be a watershed event in America\u2019s history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented for peacetime and undermine Americans\u2019 fundamental sense of security within their own borders in a manner akin to the 1949 Soviet atomic bomb test, or perhaps even worse. \uf05b\u2026\uf05d Like Pearl Harbor, the event would divide our past and future into a before and after. The United States might respond with draconian measures scaling back civil liberties, allowing wider surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects and use of deadly force.\u201d This is the man who controlled the governmental investigation on the 9\/11 terror attacks. Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, who nominally led the commission, revealed in their book\u00a0Without Precedent: The Inside Story of the 9\/11 Commission\u00a0<\/i>(2006), that the commission \u201cwas set up to fail\u201d from the beginning. Zelikow, they claim, had already written a synopsis and a conclusion for the final report before the first meeting. He controlled all the working groups, prevented them from communicating with each other, and gave them as sole mission to prove the official story; Team 1A, for example, was tasked to \u201ctell the story of Al-Qaeda\u2019s most successful operation\u2014the 9\/11 attacks.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nA tight control of mainstream media is perhaps the most delicate aspect of the whole operation. I will not delve into that aspect, for we all know what to expect from the MSM. For a groundbreaking argument on the extent to which 9\/11 was psy-op orchestrated by MSM, I recommend\u00a0Ace Baker\u2019s 2012 documentary\u00a09\/11 The Great American Psy-Opera<\/i><\/a>,\u00a0<\/i>chapters 6, 7 and 8.<\/span><\/p>\nMachiavellian meta-Zionists<\/a><\/h2>\nIf we move up to the very highest level of the conspiracy, we find ourselves in Tel Aviv. The preparation for 9\/11 coincided with the coming to power of Benjamin Netanyahu in 1996, followed by Ehud Barak in July 1999, and Ariel Sharon in March 2001, who brought back Netanyahu as minister of Foreign Affairs in 2002 (with Netanyahu again becoming prime minister in 2009). It must be noted that both Netanyahu and Ehud Barak were temporarily out of the Israeli government in September 2001, just like Ben-Gurion at the time of Kennedy\u2019s assassination (read my article on JFK<\/a>). A few months before 9\/11, Barak, a former head of Israeli military intelligence, was \u201crecruited\u201d as a consultant to a Mossad front company, SCP Partner, specializing in security and located less than seven miles from Urban Moving Systems.[8]<\/i><\/i><\/a>\u00a0One hour after the explosion of the North Tower,\u00a0Barak was on BBC World<\/a>\u00a0to point the finger at bin Laden (the first to do so), and concluded: \u201cIt\u2019s a time to launch an operational, complete war against terror.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nAs for Netanyahu, we are not surprised to hear him boast, on\u00a0CNN in 2006<\/a>, of having predicted in 1995 that, \u201cif the West doesn\u2019t wake up to the suicidal nature of militant Islam, the next thing you will see is militant Islam bringing down the World Trade Center.\u201d Netanyahu is exemplary of the ever closer \u201cspecial relationship\u201d between the US and Israel, which started with Truman and blossomed under Johnson. Netanyahu had lived, studied, and worked in the United States from 1960 to 1978, between his 11th<\/sup>and his 27th<\/sup>\u00a0year\u2014except during his military service\u2014and again after the age of 33, when he was appointed deputy ambassador to Washington and then permanent delegate to the United Nations. Netanyahu appeared regularly on CNN in the early 1990s, contributing to the transformation of the world\u2019s leading news channel into a major Zionist propaganda tool. His political destiny was largely planned and shaped in the United States, under the supervision of those we now call neoconservatives, and the only thing that distinguishes him from them is that, for public relations reasons, he does not possess American nationality.<\/span><\/p>\n\u201cWhat\u2019s a neocon?\u201d once asked Bush 43 to his father Bush 41, after more than three years in the White House. \u201cDo you want names, or a description?\u201d answered 41. \u201cDescription.\u201d \u201cWell,\u201d said 41, \u201cI\u2019ll give it to you in one word: Israel.\u201d[9]<\/i><\/a>\u00a0That anecdote, quoted by Andrew Cockburn, sums it up. The neoconservative movement was born in the editorial office of the monthly magazine\u00a0Commentary<\/i>, which had replaced the\u00a0Contemporary Jewish Record<\/i>\u00a0in 1945 as the press organ of the American Jewish Committee. \u201cIf there is an intellectual movement in America to whose invention Jews can lay sole claim, neoconservatism is it,\u201d wrote\u00a0Gal Beckerman in the\u00a0Jewish Daily Forward<\/i><\/a>,\u00a0<\/i>January 6, 2006. \u201cIt is a fact that as a political philosophy, neoconservatism was born among the children of Jewish immigrants and is now largely the intellectual domain of those immigrants\u2019 grandchildren.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nThe founding fathers of neoconservatism (Norman Podhoretz, Irving Kristol, Donald Kagan, Paul Wolfowitz, Adam Shulsky) were self-proclaimed disciples of Leo Strauss, a German Jewish immigrant teaching at the University of Chicago. Strauss can be characterized as a meta-Zionist in the sense that, while an ardent supporter of the State of Israel, he rejected the idea that Israel as a nation should be contained within borders; Israel must retain her specificity, which is to be everywhere, he said in essence in his 1962 lecture\u00a0\u201cWhy We Remain Jews.\u201d<\/a>\u00a0Strauss would also approve of being called a Machiavellian, for in his\u00a0Thoughts on Machiavelli<\/a>,\u00a0<\/i>he praised the \u201cthe intrepidity of his thought, the grandeur of his vision, and the graceful subtlety of his speech\u201d (p. 13). Machiavelli\u2019s model of a prince was Cesar Borgia, the tyrant who after having appointed the cruel Ramiro d\u2019Orco to subdue the province of Romania, had him executed with utter cruelty, thus reaping the people\u2019s gratitude after having diverted their hatred onto another. Machiavelli, writes Strauss, \u201cis a patriot of a particular kind: He is more concerned with the salvation of his fatherland than with the salvation of his soul\u201d (p. 10). And that happens to be exactly what Jewishness is all about, according to Jewish thinkers such as Harry Waton: \u201cThe Jews that have a deeper understanding of Judaism know that the only immortality there is for the Jew is the immortality in the Jewish people\u201d (read more here<\/a>). As a matter of fact, in\u00a0the\u00a0Jewish World Review<\/i>\u00a0of June 7, 1999<\/a>, Michael Ledeen, a neocon and founding member of the\u00a0Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs<\/i>\u00a0(JINSA), assumed that Machiavelli must have been a \u201csecret Jew,\u201d since \u201cif you listen to his political philosophy you will hear Jewish music.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nThe neoconservatives of the first generation originally positioned themselves on the far left. Irving Kristol, one of the main editors of\u00a0Commentary<\/i>, had long claimed to be a Trotskyist. It was soon after the 1967 successful annexation of Arab territories by Israel that the Straussians experienced their conversion to right-wing militarism, to which they owe their new name. Norman Podhoretz, editor-in-chief from 1960 to 1995, turned from anti-war activist to defense budget booster in the early 70s. He gave the following explanation in 1979: \u201cAmerican support for Israel depended upon continued American involvement in international affairs\u2014from which it followed that an American withdrawal into the kind of isolationist mood [. . .] that now looked as though it might soon prevail again, represented a direct threat to the security of Israel.\u201d (Breaking Ranks,\u00a0<\/i>p. 336). Leading the U.S. into war for the benefit of Israel is the essence of the Machiavellian crypto-Zionists known deceptively as neoconservatives.<\/span><\/p>\nThe Project for a new (((American))) Century<\/a><\/h2>\nThe story of how the neoconservatives reached the position of influence they held under George W. Bush is a complicated one, which I can only outline. They entered the state apparatus for the first time in the baggage of Rumsfeld and Cheney, during president Ford\u2019s cabinet reshuffle known as the \u201cHalloween Massacre,\u201d following Nixon\u2019s resignation. When the Cold War calmed down after America evacuated its troops from Vietnam in 1973, and the CIA produced reassuring analyses of the USSR\u2019s military capabilities and ambitions, Rumsfeld (as Secretary of Defense) and Cheney (as Chief of Staff) persuaded Ford to appoint an independent committee, known as Team B, to revise upward the CIA estimates of the Soviet threat, and reactivate a war attitude in public opinion, Congress, and Administration. Team B was chaired by Richard Pipes and co-chaired by Paul Wolfowitz, both introduced by Richard Perle.<\/span><\/p>\nDuring the Democratic parenthesis of the Carter presidency (1976\u201380), the neoconservatives worked at unifying the largest number of Jews around their policies, by founding the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA), which became the second-most powerful pro-Israel lobby after AIPAC. According to its\u00a0\u201cmission statement\u201d<\/a>, it is \u201cdedicated to educating Congressional, military and civilian national security decision-makers on American defense and strategic interests, primarily in the Middle East, the cornerstone of which is a robust U.S.-Israeli security cooperation.\u201d In 1980, the neocons were rewarded by Ronald Reagan for their support by a dozen posts in national security and foreign policy: Richard Perle and Douglas Feith to the Department of Defense; Richard Pipes at the National Security Council; Paul Wolfowitz, Lewis \u201cScooter\u201d Libby, and Michael Ledeen in the State Department. They helped Reagan escalate the Cold War, showering billions of dollars on the military-industrial complex.<\/span><\/p>\nThe long term planning of 9\/11 probably started then. Isser Harel, founder of Israeli secret services (Shai<\/i>\u00a0in 1944,\u00a0Shin Bet<\/i>\u00a0in 1948, Mossad until 1963) is reported as prophesizing in 1980, in an interview with Christian Zionist Michael Evans, that Islamic terrorism would end up hitting America in their \u201cphallic symbol\u201d: \u201cYour biggest phallic symbol is New York City and your tallest building will be the phallic symbol they will hit\u201d.[10]<\/i><\/i><\/i><\/a>\u00a0(A whole article would be needed to document and explain the revival of the Jewish gift of apocalyptic prophecy in recent decades.)<\/span><\/p>\nIn 1996, during the Clinton years, the neoconservatives threw all their weight into their ultimate think tank, the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), directed by William Kristol and Robert Kagan. PNAC recommended taking advantage of the defeat of communism to reinforce American hegemony by preventing the emergence of any rival. Their\u00a0Statement of Principles<\/a>\u00a0<\/i>vowed to extend the current\u00a0Pax Americana<\/i>, which entailed \u201ca military that is strong and ready to meet both present and future challenges.\u201d In its September 2000 report entitled\u00a0Rebuilding America\u2019s Defenses<\/i><\/a>, PNAC anticipated that US forces must become \u201cable to rapidly deploy and win multiple simultaneous large-scale wars.\u201d This required a profound transformation, including the development of \u201ca new family of nuclear weapons designed to address new sets of military requirements.\u201d Unfortunately, according to the authors of the report, \u201cthe process of transformation [\u2026] is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event\u2014like a new Pearl Harbor.\u201d It is certainly no coincidence that the three-hour-long blockbuster\u00a0Pearl Harbor\u00a0<\/i>was released in the summer 2001, conveniently entrenching the \u201cNew Pearl Harbor\u201d meme into the minds of millions.<\/span><\/p>\nPNAC\u2019s architects played the American hegemony card by draping themselves in the super-patriotic discourse of America\u2019s civilizing mission. But their duplicity is exposed in a document brought to public knowledge in 2008: a report published in 1996 by the Israeli think tank Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies (IASPS), entitled\u00a0A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm<\/a>,\u00a0<\/i>written specifically for the new Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu. The team responsible for the report was led by Richard Perle, and included Douglas Feith and David Wurmser, who figured the same year among the signatories of PNAC. As its title suggests, the\u00a0Clean Break<\/i>\u00a0report invited Netanyahu to break with the Oslo Accords of 1993, which officially committed Israel to the return of the territories it occupied illegally since 1967. The new prime minister should instead \u201cengage every possible energy on rebuilding Zionism\u201d and reaffirm Israel\u2019s right to the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.<\/span><\/p>\nIn November 2000, Bush Jr. was elected under conditions that raised protests of electoral fraud. Dick Cheney, who had directed his campaign, named himself vice-president and introduced two dozens neoconservatives in foreign policy key positions. The State Department was entrusted to Colin Powell, but he was surrounded with neocon aides such as David Wurmser. As National Security Adviser, Condoleezza Rice, a specialist of Russia with no expertise in the Middle East, was entirely dependent on her neocon adviser Philip Zelikow. William Luti and Elliott Abrams, and later Eliot Cohen, were also tasked with steering Rice. But it was mainly from within the Defense Department under Donald Rumsfeld that the most influential neocons were able to fashion US foreign and military policy. Richard Perle occupied the crucial position of director of the Defense Policy Board, responsible for defining military strategy, while Paul Wolfowitz became the \u201csoul of the Pentagon\u201d as deputy secretary with Douglas Feith as undersecretary.<\/span><\/p>\nThe Hanukkah miracle to start WWIV<\/a><\/h2>\nAfter eight months in the presidency, Bush was confronted with the \u201ccatastrophic event,\u201d the \u201cnew Pearl Harbor\u201d that PNAC had wished for a year earlier. 9\/11 was a real\u00a0\u201cHanukkah miracle\u201d<\/a>\u00a0for Israel, commented Mossad chief Ephraim Halevy and Israeli National Security Council chairman Uzi Dayan.\u00a0Netanyahu rejoiced: \u201cIt\u2019s very good<\/a>\u00a0[\u2026] it will generate immediate sympathy [\u2026], strengthen the bond between our two peoples, because we\u2019ve experienced terror over so many decades, but the United States has now experienced a massive hemorrhaging of terror.\u201d On September 21, he published an op-ed in the\u00a0New York Post<\/i>\u00a0entitled \u201cToday, We Are All Americans,\u201d in which he delivered his favorite propaganda line: \u201cFor the bin Ladens of the world, Israel is merely a sideshow. America is the target.\u201d Three days later the\u00a0New Republic<\/i>\u00a0responded with a headline on behalf of the Americans: \u201cWe are all Israelis now.\u201d Americans experienced 9\/11 as an act of hatred from the Arab world, and they felt an immediate sympathy for Israel, which the neoconservatives relentlessly exploited. One of the aims was to encourage Americans to view Israel\u2019s oppression of the Palestinians as part of the global fight against Islamic terrorism.<\/span><\/p>\nIt was a great success. In the years preceding September 11, Israel\u2019s reputation had bottomed out; condemnations had been raining from around the world for its policy of apartheid and colonization, and its systematic war against Palestinian command structures. Increasing numbers of American voices questioned the merits of the special relationship between the United States and Israel. From the day of the attacks, it was all over. As Americans now intended to fight Arab terrorists to the death, they would stop demanding from Israel more reasonable, proportionate retaliation against Palestinian suicide bombers and rockets.<\/span><\/p>\nInstead, the president\u2019s speeches (written by neocon David Frum) characterized the 9\/11 attacks as the trigger for a world war of a new type, one fought against an invisible enemy scattered throughout the Middle East. First, vengeance must come not only against bin Laden, but also against the state harboring him: \u201cWe will make no distinction between those who committed these acts and those who harbor them\u201d (Sept. 11). Second, the war extends to the world: \u201cOur war on terror begins with Al Qaeda, but it does not end there. It will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped and defeated\u201d (Sept. 20). Third, any country that does not support Washington will be treated as an enemy: \u201cEither you are with us, or you are with the terrorists\u201d (Sept. 20).<\/span><\/p>\nIn an article in the\u00a0Wall Street Journal<\/i>\u00a0dated November 20, 2001, the neoconservative Eliot Cohen dubbed the war against terrorism as \u201cWorld War IV,\u201d a framing soon echoed by other American Zionists (the odd choice of the name WWIV rather than WWIII comes, I suspect, from the neocons\u2019 ethnocentric worldview, in which every world war is a step toward Greater Israel; since one major step was accomplished in 1967, the Cold War counts as WW3). In September 2004, at a conference in Washington entitled \u201cWorld War IV: Why We Fight, Whom We Fight, How We Fight,\u201d Cohen said: \u201cThe enemy in this war is not \u2018terrorism\u2019 [\u2026] but militant Islam.\u201d Like the Cold War, the imminent world war, according to Cohen\u2019s vision, has ideological roots, will have global implications, and will last a long time, involving a whole range of conflicts. The self-fulfilling prophecy of a new World War centered in the Middle East has also been popularized by Norman Podhoretz, in \u201cHow to Win World War IV\u201d (Commentary,<\/i>\u00a0February 2002), followed by a second article in, \u201cWorld War IV: How It Started, What It Means, and Why We Have to Win,\u201d (September 2004), and finally a book titled\u00a0World War IV: The Long Struggle Against Islamofascism\u00a0<\/i>(2007).[11]<\/i><\/a><\/span><\/p>\nThe hijacked conspiracy and the controlled opposition<\/a><\/h2>\nIn the case of 9\/11 as in the case of Kennedy, controlled opposition operates on many levels, and many honest scholars now realize that the 9\/11 Truth movement itself is partly channeled by individuals and groups secretly aiming at drawing suspicions away from Israel. Such is certainly the case of the three young Jews (Avery, Rowe, and Bermas) who directed the film\u00a0Loose Change<\/i>\u00a0(2005), the most widely watched 9\/11 conspiracy film since its first version in 2005. They hitched their whole thesis on a comparison with the never carried-out false flag project Operation Northwoods (timely revealed to the public in May 2001 in\u00a0James Bamford<\/a>\u2019s book\u00a0Body of Secrets<\/i>, written with the support of former NSA director Michael Hayden, now working for Michael Chertoff), but they failed to mention the attack on the USS Liberty, a well-documented false flag attack by Israel on its U.S. ally. They did not breathe a word about the neoconservatives\u2019 loyalty to Israel, and treat anyone who cited the Israeli role in 9\/11 as anti-Semitic. The same can be said of Bermas\u2019s more recent film\u00a0Invisible Empire<\/a>\u00a0<\/i>(2010), also produced by Alex Jones: a compilation of anti-imperialist clich\u00e9s focusing on the Bushes and the Rockefellers, without a single hint of the (((Others))).<\/span><\/p>\nIt is interesting to note that the 9\/11 scenario put forward by\u00a0Loose Change<\/i>\u00a0had actually been prewritten by Hollywood: on the 4th<\/sup>\u00a0of March, 2001,\u00a0Fox TV broadcast the first episode of the series\u00a0The Lone Gunmen<\/i><\/a>,\u00a0<\/i>watched by 13 million Americans. The plot is about computer hackers working for a secret cabal within the U.S. government, who hijack a jet by remote control with the intent to crash it into one of the Twin Towers, while making it appear to have been hijacked by Islamic terrorists. At the last seconds, the pilots manage to regain control of the plane. The purpose of the failed operation was to trigger a world war under the pretext of fighting terrorism. Truthers of the \u201cinside job\u201d school fancy that this episode must have been written by some whistleblower inside Fox. Unlikely!<\/span><\/p>\nThere is, of course, some truth in the \u201cinside job\u201d theory, as I said at the beginning. Israel (in the wider sense) would not be able to pull such an operation and get away with it, without complicity at the highest level of U.S. government. How does that work? Pretty much like for the\u00a0Kennedy assassination<\/a>, if you consider that the country was then ruled by its vice-president Dick Cheney, the president being a mere dummy (see Lou Dubose and Jake Bernstein,\u00a0Vice: Dick Cheney and the Hijacking of the American Presidency,\u00a0<\/i>Random House, 2006). In my book\u00a0JFK-9\/11<\/a>,<\/i>\u00a0I have proposed a plausible scenario of how Israel had in fact hijacked a smaller false flag attack on the Pentagon fabricated by the American Deep State, for the limited purpose of justifying the overthrow of the Talibans in Afghanistan, a goal fully supported by such \u201cGreat Gamers\u201d as Zbigniew Brzezinski, but which didn\u2019t in itself interest the neocons.<\/span><\/p>\nWhat the neocons wanted was a new war against Iraq and then a general conflagration in the Middle East leading to the crumbling of all the enemies of Israel, with Syria and Iran high on the list. So they outbid everyone and gave the operation the scale they wanted with the help of their New York super-sayan\u00a0<\/i>Silvertein. George W. Bush, Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice, and other goyim who had been kept out of the loop, finding themselves embroiled in geopolitical machinations of global scope, could merely try to save face. On September 19 and 20, Richard Perle\u2019s Defense Policy Board met in the company of Paul Wolfowitz and Bernard Lewis (inventor of the self-fulfilling prophecy of the \u201cclash of civilizations\u201d) but in the absence of Powell and Rice. They prepared a letter to Bush, written on PNAC letterhead, to remind him of his historic mission: \u201cEven if evidence does not link Iraq directly to the attack, any strategy aiming at the eradication of terrorism and its sponsors must include a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq. Failure to undertake such an effort will constitute an early and perhaps decisive surrender in the war on international terrorism.\u201d[12]<\/i><\/a>\u00a0This was an ultimatum. Bush was certainly aware of the leverage that the neocons had acquired over the major print and television media. He was obliged, under penalty of ending in the proverbial trash bin of history, to endorse the invasion of Iraq that his father had refused the Zionists ten years earlier.<\/span><\/p>\nAs for Brzezinski and other genuine U.S. imperialists, their support for the invasion of Afghanistan made their timid protests against the Iraq war ineffective. It was a little late in February 2007 when Brzezinski denounced before the Senate \u201ca historical, strategic and moral calamity [\u2026] driven by Manichaean impulses and imperial hubris.\u201d In 2012 he declared, regarding the risk of conflagration with Iran, that Obama should\u00a0stop following Israel like a \u201cstupid mule.\u201d<\/a>\u00a0He soon disappeared from the MSM, as a useful idiot no longer useful.<\/span><\/p>\nThe \u201chalf truth\u201d of the exclusively \u201cinside job\u201d theory, which denounces 9\/11 as a false flag operation perpetrated by the American state on its own citizens, functions like a secondary false flag hiding the real masters of the operation, who are in fact agents in the service of a foreign nation. One of the aims of this inside-jobish controlled opposition is to force American officials to maintain the \u201cbin Laden did it\u201d masquerade, knowing that tearing apart the fake Islamic flag would only reveal the U.S. flag, not the Israeli flag. No longer controlling the media, they would not have the means to raise this second veil to expose Israel. Any effort to get at the truth would be political suicide. Everyone understands what is at stake: if one day, under mounting pressure from public opinion or for some other strategic reason, the mainstream media abandons the official bin Laden story, the well-rehearsed slogan \u201c9\/11 was an inside job\u201d will have prepared Americans to turn against their own government, while the neocon Zionists will remain untouchable (Machiavelli\u2019s method: make another accomplish your dirty ends, then turn popular vengeance against him). And God knows what will happen, if the government has not by then succeeded in disarming its citizens through Sandy Hook-type psy-ops. Government officials have little choice but to stick to the Al-Qaeda story, at least for the next fifty years.<\/span><\/p>\nAfter reaching this conclusion in\u00a0JFK-9\/11<\/i>, I had the satisfaction of finding that Victor Thorn, in a book that had eluded me (Made in Israel: 9-11 and the Jewish Plot Against America,\u00a0<\/i>Sisyphus Press, 2011<\/a>), had already expressed it in harsher terms: \u201cIn essence, the \u20189-11 truth movement\u2019 was created\u00a0prior\u00a0<\/i>to Sept. 11, 2001 as a means of suppressing news relating to Israeli complicity. By 2002\u20132003, \u2018truthers\u2019 began appearing at rallies holding placards that read \u20189-11 was an inside job.\u2019 Initially, these signs provided hope for those who didn\u2019t believe the government and mainstream media\u2019s absurd cover stories. But then an awful realization emerged: The slogan \u20189-11 was an inside job\u2019 was quite possibly the greatest example of Israeli propaganda ever devised. [\u2026] The mantra, \u20189-11 was an inside job\u2019 is only partially true and is inherently damaging to the \u2018truth movement\u2019 because it shifts all attention away from Israel\u2019s traitorous assault against America. [\u2026] Leaders of these fake 9-11 groups know the truth about Israel\u2019s 9-11 barbarity. Their willingness to perpetuate or cover it up ultimately makes them as guilty and vile as those who launched the attacks. There are no degrees of separation in this matter. It\u2019s a black-and-white issue. Tell the entire truth about Israel\u2019s Murder, Inc. cabal, or sleep in the same infected bed as these murdering dogs lie in. [\u2026] Faux conspiratologists complain about the government and news sources not telling the truth, yet they\u2019ve erected an utter blackout on data regarding Israel and 9-11.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nThe missing .3 trillion<\/a><\/h2>\nSome readers will complain that I am making a very complex operation appear too simple. I plead guilty: I have merely tried here to outline the case against Israel in the short scope of an article. But I am fully aware that creating Greater Israel through a world war fought by the U.S. might not have been the only consideration in the preparation of 9\/11. Many private interests had to be involved. Yet I believe none of them interfered with Israel\u2019s plan, and most of them supported it.<\/span><\/p>\nThere is, for example, the\u00a0missing gold in the WTC basement<\/a>\u00a0: $200 million were recovered from the estimated $1 billion stored: who took the rest? But that is nothing compared to the $2.3 trillion that were missing from the accounts of the Department of Defense for the year 2000, in addition to $1.1 trillion missing for 1999, according to a televised declaration made on September 10th<\/sup>, 2001, the day before the attacks, by Donald Rumsfeld. Just for comparison, this is more than one thousand times the colossal losses of Enron, which triggered a chain of bankruptcies that same year. All this money evaporated into thin air under the watch of William Cohen, Defense Secretary during Bill Clinton\u2019s second term. In 2001, the man who was tasked to help track down the missing trillions was Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) Dov Zakheim, a member of PNAC and an ordained rabbi. Practically, the mystery had to be resolved by financial analysts at Resource Services Washington (RSW). Unfortunately, their offices were destroyed by \u201cal-Qaeda\u201d the following morning. The \u201chijackers\u201d or Flight AA77, rather than hitting the command center on the eastern side of the Pentagon, chose to attempt a theoretically impossible downward spiral at 180 degrees in order to hit the west side of the building precisely at the location of the accounting offices. The 34 experts at RSW perished in their offices, together with 12 other financial analysts, as is noted in the biography of the team leader Robert Russell for the\u00a0National 9\/11 Pentagon Memorial<\/a>: \u201cThe weekend before his death, his entire office attended a crab feast at the Russell home. They were celebrating the end of the fiscal-year budget completion. Tragically, every person that attended that party was involved in the Pentagon explosion, and are currently missing\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\nBy an incredible coincidence, one of the financial experts trying to make sense of the Pentagon financial loss, Bryan Jack, was reported to have died at the precise location of his office, not because he was working there that day, but because he was on a business trip on Flight AA77. In the words of the\u00a0Washington Post<\/i>\u00a0database<\/a>: \u201cBryan C. Jack was responsible for crunching America\u2019s defense budget. He was a passenger on American Airlines Flight 77, bound for official business in California when his plane struck the Pentagon, where, on any other day, Jack would have been at work at his computer\u201d. Yahweh must have a sense of chutzpah!<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n
Laurent Guy\u00e9not is the author of\u00a0JFK-9\/11: 50 years of Deep State<\/i>, Progressive Press, 2014<\/a>, and\u00a0From Yahweh to Zion: Jealous God, Chosen People, Promised Land \u2026 Clash of Civilizations<\/i><\/a>, 2018. (or $30 shipping included from Sifting and Winnowing, POB 221, Lone Rock, WI 53556).<\/span><\/p>\n
\nThe Unz Review<\/p>\n
Thanks to courageous investigators, many anomalies in the official explanation of the events of 9\/11 were posted on the Internet in the following months, providing evidence that this was a false flag operation, and that Osama bin Laden was innocent, as he repeatedly declared in the Afghan and Pakistani press and on Al Jazeera.[1]<\/i><\/a>\u00a0The proofs of this appalling fraud have been accumulating ever since, and are now accessible to anyone willing to spend a few hours of research on the Web. (Although, while preparing this article, I noticed that Google is now making access to that research more difficult than it was five years ago, artificially prioritizing anti-conspiracy sites.)<\/span><\/p>\n For example, members of\u00a0Architects and Engineers for 9\/11 Truth<\/a>\u00a0have demonstrated that it was impossible for plane crashes and jet fuel fires to trigger the collapse of the Twin Towers. Even\u00a0Donald Trump understood this<\/a>. In fact, speaking of \u201ccollapse\u201d is perhaps misleading: the towers literally exploded, pulverizing concrete and projecting pieces of steel beams weighing several hundred tons hundreds of meters laterally at high speeds. The\u00a0pyroclastic dust<\/a>\u00a0that immediately flooded through the streets, not unlike the dust from a volcano, indicates a high temperature mixture of hot gasses and relatively dense solid particles, an impossible phenomenon in a simple collapse. It is also impossible that\u00a0WTC7<\/a>, another skyscraper (47 stories), which had not been hit by a plane, collapsed into its own footprint at near free-fall speed, unless by \u201ccontrolled demolition.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n Testimonies of firefighters<\/a>\u00a0recorded shortly after the events describe sequences of explosions just before the \u201ccollapse\u201d, well below the plane impact. The presence of molten metal in the wreckage up to three weeks after the attack is inexplicable except by the presence of incompletely burned explosives. Firefighter Philip Ruvolo testified before \u00c9tienne Sauret\u2019s camera for his film\u00a0Collateral Damages<\/i><\/a>\u00a0(2011): \u201cYou\u2019d get down below and you\u2019d see molten steel\u2014molten steel running down the channelways, like you were in a foundry\u2014like lava.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n Aviation professionals<\/a>\u00a0have also reported impossibilities in the behavior of the planes. The charted speeds of the two aircraft hitting the Twin Towers, 443 mph and 542 mph, exclude these aircraft being Boeing 767s, because these speeds are virtually impossible near ground level. In the unlikely event such speeds could be attained without the aircraft falling apart, flying them accurately into the towers was mission impossible, especially by the amateur pilots blamed for the hijacking.\u00a0Hosni Mubarak, a former pilot, said he could never do it<\/a>. (He is not the only head of state to have voiced his doubts:\u00a0Chavez<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0Ahmadinejad<\/a>\u00a0are among them.) Recall that neither of the black boxes of the jetliners was ever found, an incomprehensible situation.<\/span><\/p>\n And of course, there are the obvious anomalies of Shanksville and Pentagon crash sites: no plane or credible plane debris can be seen on any of the numerous photos easily available.<\/span><\/p>\n Among the growing number of Americans who disbelieve the official version of the 9\/11 attacks, two basic theories are in competition: I called them \u201cinside job\u201d and \u201cMossad job\u201d. The first one is the dominant thesis within the so-called 9\/11 Truth movement, and blames the American government, or a faction within the American Deep State. The second one claims that the masterminds were members of a powerful Israeli network deeply infiltrated in all spheres of power within the US, including media, government, military and secret services.<\/span><\/p>\n This \u201cMossad job\u201d thesis has been gaining ground since Alan Sabrosky, a professor at the U.S. Army War College and the U.S. Military Academy, published in July 2012\u00a0an article entitled \u201cDemystifying 9\/11: Israel and the Tactics of Mistake\u201d<\/a>, where he voiced his conviction that September 11th<\/sup>\u00a0was \u201ca classic Mossad-orchestrated operation.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n We can notice from the outset that incriminating Israelis or Arabs are both \u201coutside job\u201d theories (in fact, they are mirror images of each other, which is understandable in light of what Gilad Atzmon explains about Jewish \u201cprojected guilt\u201d).[2]<\/i><\/i><\/a>\u00a0Before even looking at the evidence, \u201coutside job\u201d sounds more credible that \u201cinside job\u201d. There is something monstrous in the idea that a government can deceive and terrorize its own citizens by killing thousands of them, just for starting a series of wars that are not even in the nation\u2019s interest. By comparison, a foreign power attacking the U.S. under the false flag of a third power almost seems like fair play. Indeed suspicion of Israel\u2019s role should be natural to anyone aware of the reputation of the Mossad as: \u201cWildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian\/Arab act,\u201d in the words of a report of the U.S. Army School for Advanced Military Studies\u00a0quoted by the\u00a0<\/a>Washington Times<\/i>, September 10th<\/sup>, 2001<\/a>\u00a0\u2014 the day before the attacks.<\/span><\/p>\n This is an important point, because it raises the question of how and why the 9\/11 Truth movement has been led to endorse massively the outrageous \u201cinside job\u201d thesis without even considering the more likely thesis of an attack by a foreign power acting under an Islamic false flag\u2014and what foreign power but Israel would do that?<\/span><\/p>\n Of course, the two dissenting theses do not necessarily exclude each other; at least, no one incriminating Israel denies that corrupted elements from the American administration or deep state were involved. The\u00a0\u201cpassionate attachment\u201d<\/a>\u00a0between Israel and the U.S. has been going on for decades, and 9\/11 is one of its monstrous offsprings.<\/span><\/p>\n I can think of no better symbol of that reality than the marriage of\u00a0Ted and Barbara Olson<\/a>. Ted Oslon, after having defended Bush in the disputed 2000 election, had been rewarded with the post of Solicitor General (he also defended Dick Cheney when he refused to submit to Congress Enron-related documents). Barbara was a famous CNN reporter, but before that, she was born Barbara Kay Bracher of Jewish parents, educated at Yeshiva University School of Law, and hired by the legal firm WilmerHale, of which Jamie Gorelick, a future member of the 9\/11 Commission, was also a member, and whose clients include powerful Israeli firms like Amdocs, a digital communication company charged with\u00a0spying for Israel in the United States<\/a>. On September 11, 2001, Barbara Olson allegedly was on flight AA77, from which she made two telephone calls to her husband. Her calls were reported on CNN in the afternoon, and contributed to crystallize some details of the official story, such as the \u201cbox cutters\u201d used as only weapons by the hijackers. Repeatedly invited on television shows after 9\/11, Ted Olson frequently contradicted himself when questioned about the calls from his wife. In a 2006 report, the FBI identified only one call from Barbara Olson, and it was an unconnected call lasting 0 seconds. Like all other reported phone calls from desperate passengers (including the famous \u201cHi, Mom. This is Mark Bingham\u201d), Barbara\u2019s call was simply impossible, because the technology required to make high-altitude phone calls was not developed until 2004.[3]<\/i><\/i><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n 9\/11 was made possible by an alliance between secret worshippers of Israel and corrupted American elements. The question is: who, of the two, were the masterminds of this incredibly daring and complex operation, and for what \u201chigher purpose\u201d?<\/span><\/p>\n Another question is: why do those who keep repeating as a mantra\u00a0\u201c9\/11 was an inside job\u201d\u00a0<\/i>ignore totally the compelling evidence pointing to Israel? In other words, to what extent do they constitute a \u201ccontrolled opposition\u201d intended to cover up for Israel? Asking this type of question does not mean suspecting anyone who defends an erroneous or incomplete theory of being a hypocrite. Most people defending one theory or the other do so sincerely, based on the information to which they have access. I have myself been a believer in the official theory for 7 years, and in the \u201cinside job\u201d theory for 2 years, before progressively moving on to the present argument from 2010. On the other hand, we can assume that those who lead the public into error on a long term are not just mistaken but lying. In any case, it is legitimate to investigate the background of opinion makers, and when they are caught lying or distorting the truth, we can speculate on their motivation. I will come back to this issue at the end of the article.<\/span><\/p>\n Researchers who believe Israel orchestrated 9\/11 cite the behavior of a group of individuals who have come to be known as the \u201cdancing Israelis\u201d since their arrest, though their aim was to pass as \u201cdancing Arabs.\u201d Dressed in ostensibly \u201cMiddle Eastern\u201d attire, they were seen by various witnesses standing on the roof of a van parked in Jersey City, cheering and taking photos of each other with the WTC in the background, at the very moment the first plane hit the North Tower. The suspects then moved their van to another parking spot in Jersey City, where other witnesses saw them deliver the same ostentatious celebrations.<\/span><\/p>\n One anonymous call to the police in Jersey City, reported the same day by\u00a0NBC News,\u00a0<\/i>mentioned \u201ca white van, 2 or 3 guys in there. They look like Palestinians and going around a building. [\u2026] I see the guy by Newark Airport mixing some junk and he has those sheikh uniforms. [\u2026] He\u2019s dressed like an Arab.\u201d The police soon issued the following BOLO alert (be-on-the-look-out) for a \u201cVehicle possibly related to New York terrorist attack. White, 2000 Chevrolet van with New Jersey registration with \u2018Urban Moving Systems\u2019 sign on back seen at Liberty State Park, Jersey City, NJ, at the time of first impact of jetliner into World Trade Center. Three individuals with van were seen celebrating after initial impact and subsequent explosion.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n By chance, the van was intercepted around 4 pm, with five young men inside: Sivan and Paul Kurzberg, Yaron Shmuel, Oded Ellner, and Omer Marmari. Before any question was asked, the driver, Sivan Kurzberg, burst out: \u201cWe are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are your problem\u201d.The Kurzberg brothers were formally identified as Mossad agents. All five officially worked for a moving company (a classic cover for espionage) named Urban Moving Systems, whose owner, Dominik Otto Suter, fled the country for Tel Aviv on September 14.[4]<\/i><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n This event was first reported the day after the attacks by journalist\u00a0Paulo Lima in the New Jersey newspaper\u00a0<\/a>The Bergen Record<\/i><\/a>, based on \u201csources close to the investigation\u201d who were convinced of the suspects\u2019 foreknowledge of the morning\u2019s attacks: \u201cIt looked like they knew what was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park\u201d.The 579-page\u00a0FBI report on the investigation<\/a>\u00a0that followed (partially declassified in 2005) reveals several important facts. First, once developed, the photos taken by the suspects while watching the North Tower on fire confirm their attitudes of celebration: \u201cThey smiled, they hugged each other and they appeared to \u2018high five\u2019 one another\u201d. To explain their contentment, the suspects said they were simply happy that, thanks to these terrorist attacks, \u201cthe United States will take steps to stop terrorism in the world\u201d. Yet at this point, before the second tower was hit, most Americans believed the crash was an accident. The five Israelis were found connected to another company called Classic International Movers, which employed five other Israelis arrested for their contacts with the nineteen presumed suicide hijackers. In addition, one of the five suspects had called \u201can individual in South America with authentic ties to Islamic militants in the middle east\u201d. Finally, the FBI report states that the \u201cThe vehicle was also searched by a trained bomb-sniffing dog which yielded a positive result for the presence of explosive traces\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n After all this incriminating evidence comes the most puzzling passage of the report: its conclusion that \u201cthe FBI no longer has any investigative interests in the detainees and they should proceed with the appropriate immigration proceedings\u201d. In fact, a letter addressed to the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service, dated September 25, 2001, proves that, less than two weeks after the events, the FBI federal headquarter had already decided to close the investigation, asking that \u201cThe U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service should proceed with the appropriate immigration proceedings\u201d. The five \u201cdancing Israelis\u201d, also known as \u201cthe high fivers\u201d,<\/i>\u00a0were detained 71 days in a Brooklyn prison, where they first refused, then failed, lie detector tests. Finally, they were quietly returned to Israel under the minimal charge of \u201cvisa violation.\u201d Three of them were then invited on an Israeli TV talk show in November 2001, where one of them ingenuously declared:\u00a0\u201cOur purpose was simply to document the event.\u201d<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n The five \u201cdancing Israelis,\u201d the only suspects arrested on the very day of the 9\/11 attacks, were just the tip of an iceberg. In September 2001, the federal police were busy dismantling the largest Israeli spy network ever uncovered on American soil. In the summer preceding the attack, the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) compiled a report which would be revealed to the public by the\u00a0Washington Post<\/i>\u00a0on November 23rd<\/sup>, 2001, followed by a\u00a0Carl Cameron\u2019s four-part documentary broadcast on Fox News<\/a>\u00a0from December 11th<\/sup>, 2001. On March 14th<\/sup>, 2002, an article in French newspaper\u00a0Le Monde<\/i>\u00a0signed by Sylvain Cypel also referred to the report, shortly before the French magazine\u00a0Intelligence Online<\/i>\u00a0made it\u00a0fully accessible on the Internet<\/a>.[5]<\/i><\/a>It said that 140 Israeli spies, aged between 20 and 30, had been arrested since March 2001, while 60 more were arrested after September 11. Generally posing as art students, they visited at least \u201c36 sensitive sites of the Department of Defense.\u201d \u201cA majority of those questioned have stated they served in military intelligence, electronic signal intercept, or explosive ordnance units. Some have been linked to high-ranking officials in the Israeli military. One was the son of a two-star general, one served as the bodyguard to the head of the Israeli Army, one served in a Patriot mission unit.\u201d Another, Peer Segalovitz, officer in the 605 Battalion of the Golan Heights, \u201cacknowledged he could blow up buildings, bridges, cars, and anything else that he needed to.\u201d[6]<\/i><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n Of special interest is the mention that \u201cthe Hollywood, Florida, area seems to be a central point for these individuals.\u201d[7]<\/i><\/a>\u00a0More than 30 out of the 140 fake Israeli students identified before 9\/11 lived in that city of 140,000 inhabitants. And this city also happens to be the place where fifteen of the nineteen alleged 9\/11 Islamist hijackers had regrouped (nine in Hollywood, six in the vicinity), including four of the five supposed to have hijacked Flight AA11. What was the relationship between the Israeli spies and the Islamist terrorists? We were told by\u00a0mainstream news<\/a>\u00a0that the former were monitoring the latter, but failed to report suspicious activities of these terrorists to American authorities. From such a presentation, Israel comes out clean, since a spy agency cannot be blamed for not sharing information with the country it is spying in. At worst, the Israeli Intelligence can be accused of \u201cletting it happen\u201d\u2014a guarantee of impunity. In reality, the Israeli agents were certainly not just monitoring the future \u201chijackers,\u201d but financing and manipulating them, before disposing of them. We know that Israeli Hanan Serfaty, who rented two flats near Mohamed Atta, had handled at least $100,000 in three months. And we also learned from the\u00a0New York Times<\/i>\u00a0on February 19, 2009<\/a>, that Ali al-Jarrah, cousin of the alleged hijacker of Flight UA93 Ziad al-Jarrah, had spent twenty-five years spying for the Mossad as an undercover agent infiltrating the Palestinian resistance and Hezbollah.<\/span><\/p>\n Israeli agents apparently appreciate operating under the cover of artists. Shortly before September 11, a group of fourteen Jewish \u201cartists\u201d under the name of\u00a0Gelatin<\/a>\u00a0installed themselves on the ninety-first floor of the north tower of the World Trade Center. There, as a work of \u201cstreet art,\u201d they removed a window and extended a wooden balcony. To understand what role this piece of scaffolding may have played, it must be remembered that the explosion supposedly resulting from the impact of the Boeing AA11 on the North Tower took place between the ninety-second and the ninety-eighth floors. With the only film of the impact on the North Tower being that of the Naudet brothers, who are under suspicion for numerous reasons, many researchers are convinced that no aircraft hit this tower, and that the explosion simulating the impact was provoked by pre-planted explosives inside the tower.<\/span><\/p>\n Floors ninety-three to one hundred of the North Tower were occupied by Marsh & McLennan, whose CEO was Jeffrey Greenberg, son of wealthy Zionist (and financier of George W. Bush) Maurice Greenberg, who also happens to be the owner of Kroll Inc., the firm in charge of security for the entire World Trade Center complex on 9\/11. The Greenbergs were also the insurers of the Twin Towers and, on July 24, 2001, they took the precaution of having the contract reinsured by competitors. In November 2000, the board of directors of Marsh & McLennan was joined by (Lewis) Paul Bremer, the chairman of the National Commission on Terrorism, who, on September 11, 2001, two hours only after the pulverization of the North Tower, would\u00a0appear on NBC to name bin Laden as prime suspect<\/a>, perfectly calm as 400 of his employees are missing (295 will finally be declared dead). \u201cIt is the day that will change our lives,\u201d he said. \u201cIt is the day when the war that the terrorists declared on the US [. . .] has been brought home to the US.\u201d In 2003, Bremer would be appointed administrator of the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq to level the Iraqi state to the ground and oversee the theft of almost a trillion dollars intended for its reconstruction.<\/span><\/p>\n With Goldberg and Bremer, we have reached the upper level of the conspiracy, comprising a number of influential Jewish personalities, working inside and outside the U.S. government \u2014 super-sayanim<\/i>, so to speak. The most representative of those outside government is Larry Silverstein, the real estate shark who, with his partner Frank Lowy, leased the Twin Towers from New York City in the spring of 2001. The head of the New York Port Authority, who granted Silverstein and Lowy the lease, was none other than Lewis Eisenberg, another member of the United Jewish Appeal Federation and former vice-president of AIPAC. It appeared that Silverstein had made a disastrous deal, because\u00a0the Twin Towers had to be decontaminated for asbestos<\/a>. The decontamination process had been indefinitely postponed since the 1980s because of its cost, estimated at nearly $1 billion in 1989. In 2001, the New York Port Authority had been all too happy to shift responsibility to Silverstein.<\/span><\/p>\n Immediately after acquiring the Twin Towers, Silverstein renegotiated the insurance contracts to cover terrorist attacks, doubling the coverage to $3.5 billion, and made sure he would retain the right to rebuild after such an event. After the attacks, he took his insurers to court in order to receive double compensation, claiming that the two planes were two separate attacks. After a long legal battle,\u00a0he pocketed $4.5 billion<\/a>. Silverstein is a leading member of the United Jewish Appeal Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York, the biggest fundraiser for Israel (after the US government, which pays about $3 billion per year in aid to Israel). Silverstein also maintained \u201cclose ties with Netanyahu,\u201d according to\u00a0Haaretz\u00a0<\/i>(November 21, 2001)<\/a>: \u201cThe two have been on friendly terms since Netanyahu\u2019s stint as Israel\u2019s ambassador to the United Nations. For years they kept in close touch. Every Sunday afternoon, New York time, Netanyahu would call Silverstein.\u201d Besides being a powerful man, Larry is a lucky man:\u00a0as he explained in this interview<\/a>, every morning of the week, he had breakfast at the\u00a0Windows on the World<\/i>\u00a0on top of the North Tower, but on September 11th, he had an appointment with his dermatologist.<\/span><\/p>\n Accomplices to the 9\/11 false flag attack with strong Israeli connections should also be tracked at the other end of the trajectory of the planes reported to have crashed into the Twin Towers. Flights AA11 and UA175 took off from Logan Airport in Boston, which subcontracted their security to International Consultants on Targeted Security\u00a0(ICTS), a firm based in Israel and headed by Menachem Atzmon<\/a>, a treasurer of the Likud. So did Newark Airport where flight UA93 reportedly took off before crashing in Shanksville.<\/span><\/p>\n A serious investigation would follow many other trails, such as the Odigo instant messages received by employees at the WTC two hours before the plane crashes, as reported by\u00a0Haaretz<\/a>\u00a0<\/i>on September 27th<\/sup>, 2001. The first plane hit the WTC at the precise time announced,\u00a0\u201calmost to the minute,\u201d<\/a>\u00a0admitted Alex Diamandis, vice-president of Odigo, headquartered in Israel. Also disturbing is the behavior of the American branch of\u00a0Zim Israel Navigational,<\/i>\u00a0a maritime shipping giant 48% owned by the Jewish state (occasionally used as a cover for the Israeli secret services), which moved its offices from the WTC, along with its 200 employees, September 4th<\/sup>, 2001, one week before the attacks \u2014\u201clike an act of God, we moved\u201d,\u00a0<\/i>said the CEO Shaul Cohen-Mintz when\u00a0interviewed by\u00a0<\/a>USA Today<\/i>, November 17th<\/sup>, 2001<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n But of course, none of these trails were ever pursued. That is because the most powerful conspirators were at the highest level of the Justice Department. Michael Chertoff was head of the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice in 2001, and responsible, among many other things, for securing the release of the Israeli agents arrested before and after 9\/11, including the \u201cdancing Israelis.\u201d In 2003, this son of a rabbi and of a Mossad pioneer would be appointed Secretary of Homeland Security, in charge of counter-terrorism on the American soil, which allowed him to control dissenting citizens and restrain access to the evidence under the pretext of Sensitive Security Information.<\/span><\/p>\n Another chief of the cover-up was Philip Zelikow, the executive director of the 9\/11 presidential Commission established in November 2002. Zelikow is a self-styled specialist in the art of making \u201cpublic myths\u201d by \u201c\u2018searing\u2019 or \u2018molding\u2019 events [that] take on \u2018transcendent\u2019 importance and, therefore, retain their power even as the experiencing generation passes from the scene\u201d (Wikipedia<\/a>). In December 1998, he co-signed an article for\u00a0Foreign Affairs<\/i>\u00a0entitled \u201cCatastrophic Terrorism,\u201d<\/a>\u00a0in which he speculated on what would have happened if the 1993 WTC bombing (already attributed to bin Laden) had been done with a nuclear bomb: \u201cAn act of catastrophic terrorism that killed thousands or tens of thousands of people and\/or disrupted the necessities of life for hundreds of thousands, or even millions, would be a watershed event in America\u2019s history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented for peacetime and undermine Americans\u2019 fundamental sense of security within their own borders in a manner akin to the 1949 Soviet atomic bomb test, or perhaps even worse. \uf05b\u2026\uf05d Like Pearl Harbor, the event would divide our past and future into a before and after. The United States might respond with draconian measures scaling back civil liberties, allowing wider surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects and use of deadly force.\u201d This is the man who controlled the governmental investigation on the 9\/11 terror attacks. Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, who nominally led the commission, revealed in their book\u00a0Without Precedent: The Inside Story of the 9\/11 Commission\u00a0<\/i>(2006), that the commission \u201cwas set up to fail\u201d from the beginning. Zelikow, they claim, had already written a synopsis and a conclusion for the final report before the first meeting. He controlled all the working groups, prevented them from communicating with each other, and gave them as sole mission to prove the official story; Team 1A, for example, was tasked to \u201ctell the story of Al-Qaeda\u2019s most successful operation\u2014the 9\/11 attacks.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n A tight control of mainstream media is perhaps the most delicate aspect of the whole operation. I will not delve into that aspect, for we all know what to expect from the MSM. For a groundbreaking argument on the extent to which 9\/11 was psy-op orchestrated by MSM, I recommend\u00a0Ace Baker\u2019s 2012 documentary\u00a09\/11 The Great American Psy-Opera<\/i><\/a>,\u00a0<\/i>chapters 6, 7 and 8.<\/span><\/p>\n If we move up to the very highest level of the conspiracy, we find ourselves in Tel Aviv. The preparation for 9\/11 coincided with the coming to power of Benjamin Netanyahu in 1996, followed by Ehud Barak in July 1999, and Ariel Sharon in March 2001, who brought back Netanyahu as minister of Foreign Affairs in 2002 (with Netanyahu again becoming prime minister in 2009). It must be noted that both Netanyahu and Ehud Barak were temporarily out of the Israeli government in September 2001, just like Ben-Gurion at the time of Kennedy\u2019s assassination (read my article on JFK<\/a>). A few months before 9\/11, Barak, a former head of Israeli military intelligence, was \u201crecruited\u201d as a consultant to a Mossad front company, SCP Partner, specializing in security and located less than seven miles from Urban Moving Systems.[8]<\/i><\/i><\/a>\u00a0One hour after the explosion of the North Tower,\u00a0Barak was on BBC World<\/a>\u00a0to point the finger at bin Laden (the first to do so), and concluded: \u201cIt\u2019s a time to launch an operational, complete war against terror.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n As for Netanyahu, we are not surprised to hear him boast, on\u00a0CNN in 2006<\/a>, of having predicted in 1995 that, \u201cif the West doesn\u2019t wake up to the suicidal nature of militant Islam, the next thing you will see is militant Islam bringing down the World Trade Center.\u201d Netanyahu is exemplary of the ever closer \u201cspecial relationship\u201d between the US and Israel, which started with Truman and blossomed under Johnson. Netanyahu had lived, studied, and worked in the United States from 1960 to 1978, between his 11th<\/sup>and his 27th<\/sup>\u00a0year\u2014except during his military service\u2014and again after the age of 33, when he was appointed deputy ambassador to Washington and then permanent delegate to the United Nations. Netanyahu appeared regularly on CNN in the early 1990s, contributing to the transformation of the world\u2019s leading news channel into a major Zionist propaganda tool. His political destiny was largely planned and shaped in the United States, under the supervision of those we now call neoconservatives, and the only thing that distinguishes him from them is that, for public relations reasons, he does not possess American nationality.<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cWhat\u2019s a neocon?\u201d once asked Bush 43 to his father Bush 41, after more than three years in the White House. \u201cDo you want names, or a description?\u201d answered 41. \u201cDescription.\u201d \u201cWell,\u201d said 41, \u201cI\u2019ll give it to you in one word: Israel.\u201d[9]<\/i><\/a>\u00a0That anecdote, quoted by Andrew Cockburn, sums it up. The neoconservative movement was born in the editorial office of the monthly magazine\u00a0Commentary<\/i>, which had replaced the\u00a0Contemporary Jewish Record<\/i>\u00a0in 1945 as the press organ of the American Jewish Committee. \u201cIf there is an intellectual movement in America to whose invention Jews can lay sole claim, neoconservatism is it,\u201d wrote\u00a0Gal Beckerman in the\u00a0Jewish Daily Forward<\/i><\/a>,\u00a0<\/i>January 6, 2006. \u201cIt is a fact that as a political philosophy, neoconservatism was born among the children of Jewish immigrants and is now largely the intellectual domain of those immigrants\u2019 grandchildren.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n The founding fathers of neoconservatism (Norman Podhoretz, Irving Kristol, Donald Kagan, Paul Wolfowitz, Adam Shulsky) were self-proclaimed disciples of Leo Strauss, a German Jewish immigrant teaching at the University of Chicago. Strauss can be characterized as a meta-Zionist in the sense that, while an ardent supporter of the State of Israel, he rejected the idea that Israel as a nation should be contained within borders; Israel must retain her specificity, which is to be everywhere, he said in essence in his 1962 lecture\u00a0\u201cWhy We Remain Jews.\u201d<\/a>\u00a0Strauss would also approve of being called a Machiavellian, for in his\u00a0Thoughts on Machiavelli<\/a>,\u00a0<\/i>he praised the \u201cthe intrepidity of his thought, the grandeur of his vision, and the graceful subtlety of his speech\u201d (p. 13). Machiavelli\u2019s model of a prince was Cesar Borgia, the tyrant who after having appointed the cruel Ramiro d\u2019Orco to subdue the province of Romania, had him executed with utter cruelty, thus reaping the people\u2019s gratitude after having diverted their hatred onto another. Machiavelli, writes Strauss, \u201cis a patriot of a particular kind: He is more concerned with the salvation of his fatherland than with the salvation of his soul\u201d (p. 10). And that happens to be exactly what Jewishness is all about, according to Jewish thinkers such as Harry Waton: \u201cThe Jews that have a deeper understanding of Judaism know that the only immortality there is for the Jew is the immortality in the Jewish people\u201d (read more here<\/a>). As a matter of fact, in\u00a0the\u00a0Jewish World Review<\/i>\u00a0of June 7, 1999<\/a>, Michael Ledeen, a neocon and founding member of the\u00a0Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs<\/i>\u00a0(JINSA), assumed that Machiavelli must have been a \u201csecret Jew,\u201d since \u201cif you listen to his political philosophy you will hear Jewish music.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n The neoconservatives of the first generation originally positioned themselves on the far left. Irving Kristol, one of the main editors of\u00a0Commentary<\/i>, had long claimed to be a Trotskyist. It was soon after the 1967 successful annexation of Arab territories by Israel that the Straussians experienced their conversion to right-wing militarism, to which they owe their new name. Norman Podhoretz, editor-in-chief from 1960 to 1995, turned from anti-war activist to defense budget booster in the early 70s. He gave the following explanation in 1979: \u201cAmerican support for Israel depended upon continued American involvement in international affairs\u2014from which it followed that an American withdrawal into the kind of isolationist mood [. . .] that now looked as though it might soon prevail again, represented a direct threat to the security of Israel.\u201d (Breaking Ranks,\u00a0<\/i>p. 336). Leading the U.S. into war for the benefit of Israel is the essence of the Machiavellian crypto-Zionists known deceptively as neoconservatives.<\/span><\/p>\n The story of how the neoconservatives reached the position of influence they held under George W. Bush is a complicated one, which I can only outline. They entered the state apparatus for the first time in the baggage of Rumsfeld and Cheney, during president Ford\u2019s cabinet reshuffle known as the \u201cHalloween Massacre,\u201d following Nixon\u2019s resignation. When the Cold War calmed down after America evacuated its troops from Vietnam in 1973, and the CIA produced reassuring analyses of the USSR\u2019s military capabilities and ambitions, Rumsfeld (as Secretary of Defense) and Cheney (as Chief of Staff) persuaded Ford to appoint an independent committee, known as Team B, to revise upward the CIA estimates of the Soviet threat, and reactivate a war attitude in public opinion, Congress, and Administration. Team B was chaired by Richard Pipes and co-chaired by Paul Wolfowitz, both introduced by Richard Perle.<\/span><\/p>\n During the Democratic parenthesis of the Carter presidency (1976\u201380), the neoconservatives worked at unifying the largest number of Jews around their policies, by founding the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA), which became the second-most powerful pro-Israel lobby after AIPAC. According to its\u00a0\u201cmission statement\u201d<\/a>, it is \u201cdedicated to educating Congressional, military and civilian national security decision-makers on American defense and strategic interests, primarily in the Middle East, the cornerstone of which is a robust U.S.-Israeli security cooperation.\u201d In 1980, the neocons were rewarded by Ronald Reagan for their support by a dozen posts in national security and foreign policy: Richard Perle and Douglas Feith to the Department of Defense; Richard Pipes at the National Security Council; Paul Wolfowitz, Lewis \u201cScooter\u201d Libby, and Michael Ledeen in the State Department. They helped Reagan escalate the Cold War, showering billions of dollars on the military-industrial complex.<\/span><\/p>\n The long term planning of 9\/11 probably started then. Isser Harel, founder of Israeli secret services (Shai<\/i>\u00a0in 1944,\u00a0Shin Bet<\/i>\u00a0in 1948, Mossad until 1963) is reported as prophesizing in 1980, in an interview with Christian Zionist Michael Evans, that Islamic terrorism would end up hitting America in their \u201cphallic symbol\u201d: \u201cYour biggest phallic symbol is New York City and your tallest building will be the phallic symbol they will hit\u201d.[10]<\/i><\/i><\/i><\/a>\u00a0(A whole article would be needed to document and explain the revival of the Jewish gift of apocalyptic prophecy in recent decades.)<\/span><\/p>\n In 1996, during the Clinton years, the neoconservatives threw all their weight into their ultimate think tank, the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), directed by William Kristol and Robert Kagan. PNAC recommended taking advantage of the defeat of communism to reinforce American hegemony by preventing the emergence of any rival. Their\u00a0Statement of Principles<\/a>\u00a0<\/i>vowed to extend the current\u00a0Pax Americana<\/i>, which entailed \u201ca military that is strong and ready to meet both present and future challenges.\u201d In its September 2000 report entitled\u00a0Rebuilding America\u2019s Defenses<\/i><\/a>, PNAC anticipated that US forces must become \u201cable to rapidly deploy and win multiple simultaneous large-scale wars.\u201d This required a profound transformation, including the development of \u201ca new family of nuclear weapons designed to address new sets of military requirements.\u201d Unfortunately, according to the authors of the report, \u201cthe process of transformation [\u2026] is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event\u2014like a new Pearl Harbor.\u201d It is certainly no coincidence that the three-hour-long blockbuster\u00a0Pearl Harbor\u00a0<\/i>was released in the summer 2001, conveniently entrenching the \u201cNew Pearl Harbor\u201d meme into the minds of millions.<\/span><\/p>\n PNAC\u2019s architects played the American hegemony card by draping themselves in the super-patriotic discourse of America\u2019s civilizing mission. But their duplicity is exposed in a document brought to public knowledge in 2008: a report published in 1996 by the Israeli think tank Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies (IASPS), entitled\u00a0A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm<\/a>,\u00a0<\/i>written specifically for the new Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu. The team responsible for the report was led by Richard Perle, and included Douglas Feith and David Wurmser, who figured the same year among the signatories of PNAC. As its title suggests, the\u00a0Clean Break<\/i>\u00a0report invited Netanyahu to break with the Oslo Accords of 1993, which officially committed Israel to the return of the territories it occupied illegally since 1967. The new prime minister should instead \u201cengage every possible energy on rebuilding Zionism\u201d and reaffirm Israel\u2019s right to the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.<\/span><\/p>\n In November 2000, Bush Jr. was elected under conditions that raised protests of electoral fraud. Dick Cheney, who had directed his campaign, named himself vice-president and introduced two dozens neoconservatives in foreign policy key positions. The State Department was entrusted to Colin Powell, but he was surrounded with neocon aides such as David Wurmser. As National Security Adviser, Condoleezza Rice, a specialist of Russia with no expertise in the Middle East, was entirely dependent on her neocon adviser Philip Zelikow. William Luti and Elliott Abrams, and later Eliot Cohen, were also tasked with steering Rice. But it was mainly from within the Defense Department under Donald Rumsfeld that the most influential neocons were able to fashion US foreign and military policy. Richard Perle occupied the crucial position of director of the Defense Policy Board, responsible for defining military strategy, while Paul Wolfowitz became the \u201csoul of the Pentagon\u201d as deputy secretary with Douglas Feith as undersecretary.<\/span><\/p>\n After eight months in the presidency, Bush was confronted with the \u201ccatastrophic event,\u201d the \u201cnew Pearl Harbor\u201d that PNAC had wished for a year earlier. 9\/11 was a real\u00a0\u201cHanukkah miracle\u201d<\/a>\u00a0for Israel, commented Mossad chief Ephraim Halevy and Israeli National Security Council chairman Uzi Dayan.\u00a0Netanyahu rejoiced: \u201cIt\u2019s very good<\/a>\u00a0[\u2026] it will generate immediate sympathy [\u2026], strengthen the bond between our two peoples, because we\u2019ve experienced terror over so many decades, but the United States has now experienced a massive hemorrhaging of terror.\u201d On September 21, he published an op-ed in the\u00a0New York Post<\/i>\u00a0entitled \u201cToday, We Are All Americans,\u201d in which he delivered his favorite propaganda line: \u201cFor the bin Ladens of the world, Israel is merely a sideshow. America is the target.\u201d Three days later the\u00a0New Republic<\/i>\u00a0responded with a headline on behalf of the Americans: \u201cWe are all Israelis now.\u201d Americans experienced 9\/11 as an act of hatred from the Arab world, and they felt an immediate sympathy for Israel, which the neoconservatives relentlessly exploited. One of the aims was to encourage Americans to view Israel\u2019s oppression of the Palestinians as part of the global fight against Islamic terrorism.<\/span><\/p>\n It was a great success. In the years preceding September 11, Israel\u2019s reputation had bottomed out; condemnations had been raining from around the world for its policy of apartheid and colonization, and its systematic war against Palestinian command structures. Increasing numbers of American voices questioned the merits of the special relationship between the United States and Israel. From the day of the attacks, it was all over. As Americans now intended to fight Arab terrorists to the death, they would stop demanding from Israel more reasonable, proportionate retaliation against Palestinian suicide bombers and rockets.<\/span><\/p>\n Instead, the president\u2019s speeches (written by neocon David Frum) characterized the 9\/11 attacks as the trigger for a world war of a new type, one fought against an invisible enemy scattered throughout the Middle East. First, vengeance must come not only against bin Laden, but also against the state harboring him: \u201cWe will make no distinction between those who committed these acts and those who harbor them\u201d (Sept. 11). Second, the war extends to the world: \u201cOur war on terror begins with Al Qaeda, but it does not end there. It will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped and defeated\u201d (Sept. 20). Third, any country that does not support Washington will be treated as an enemy: \u201cEither you are with us, or you are with the terrorists\u201d (Sept. 20).<\/span><\/p>\n In an article in the\u00a0Wall Street Journal<\/i>\u00a0dated November 20, 2001, the neoconservative Eliot Cohen dubbed the war against terrorism as \u201cWorld War IV,\u201d a framing soon echoed by other American Zionists (the odd choice of the name WWIV rather than WWIII comes, I suspect, from the neocons\u2019 ethnocentric worldview, in which every world war is a step toward Greater Israel; since one major step was accomplished in 1967, the Cold War counts as WW3). In September 2004, at a conference in Washington entitled \u201cWorld War IV: Why We Fight, Whom We Fight, How We Fight,\u201d Cohen said: \u201cThe enemy in this war is not \u2018terrorism\u2019 [\u2026] but militant Islam.\u201d Like the Cold War, the imminent world war, according to Cohen\u2019s vision, has ideological roots, will have global implications, and will last a long time, involving a whole range of conflicts. The self-fulfilling prophecy of a new World War centered in the Middle East has also been popularized by Norman Podhoretz, in \u201cHow to Win World War IV\u201d (Commentary,<\/i>\u00a0February 2002), followed by a second article in, \u201cWorld War IV: How It Started, What It Means, and Why We Have to Win,\u201d (September 2004), and finally a book titled\u00a0World War IV: The Long Struggle Against Islamofascism\u00a0<\/i>(2007).[11]<\/i><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n In the case of 9\/11 as in the case of Kennedy, controlled opposition operates on many levels, and many honest scholars now realize that the 9\/11 Truth movement itself is partly channeled by individuals and groups secretly aiming at drawing suspicions away from Israel. Such is certainly the case of the three young Jews (Avery, Rowe, and Bermas) who directed the film\u00a0Loose Change<\/i>\u00a0(2005), the most widely watched 9\/11 conspiracy film since its first version in 2005. They hitched their whole thesis on a comparison with the never carried-out false flag project Operation Northwoods (timely revealed to the public in May 2001 in\u00a0James Bamford<\/a>\u2019s book\u00a0Body of Secrets<\/i>, written with the support of former NSA director Michael Hayden, now working for Michael Chertoff), but they failed to mention the attack on the USS Liberty, a well-documented false flag attack by Israel on its U.S. ally. They did not breathe a word about the neoconservatives\u2019 loyalty to Israel, and treat anyone who cited the Israeli role in 9\/11 as anti-Semitic. The same can be said of Bermas\u2019s more recent film\u00a0Invisible Empire<\/a>\u00a0<\/i>(2010), also produced by Alex Jones: a compilation of anti-imperialist clich\u00e9s focusing on the Bushes and the Rockefellers, without a single hint of the (((Others))).<\/span><\/p>\n It is interesting to note that the 9\/11 scenario put forward by\u00a0Loose Change<\/i>\u00a0had actually been prewritten by Hollywood: on the 4th<\/sup>\u00a0of March, 2001,\u00a0Fox TV broadcast the first episode of the series\u00a0The Lone Gunmen<\/i><\/a>,\u00a0<\/i>watched by 13 million Americans. The plot is about computer hackers working for a secret cabal within the U.S. government, who hijack a jet by remote control with the intent to crash it into one of the Twin Towers, while making it appear to have been hijacked by Islamic terrorists. At the last seconds, the pilots manage to regain control of the plane. The purpose of the failed operation was to trigger a world war under the pretext of fighting terrorism. Truthers of the \u201cinside job\u201d school fancy that this episode must have been written by some whistleblower inside Fox. Unlikely!<\/span><\/p>\n There is, of course, some truth in the \u201cinside job\u201d theory, as I said at the beginning. Israel (in the wider sense) would not be able to pull such an operation and get away with it, without complicity at the highest level of U.S. government. How does that work? Pretty much like for the\u00a0Kennedy assassination<\/a>, if you consider that the country was then ruled by its vice-president Dick Cheney, the president being a mere dummy (see Lou Dubose and Jake Bernstein,\u00a0Vice: Dick Cheney and the Hijacking of the American Presidency,\u00a0<\/i>Random House, 2006). In my book\u00a0JFK-9\/11<\/a>,<\/i>\u00a0I have proposed a plausible scenario of how Israel had in fact hijacked a smaller false flag attack on the Pentagon fabricated by the American Deep State, for the limited purpose of justifying the overthrow of the Talibans in Afghanistan, a goal fully supported by such \u201cGreat Gamers\u201d as Zbigniew Brzezinski, but which didn\u2019t in itself interest the neocons.<\/span><\/p>\n What the neocons wanted was a new war against Iraq and then a general conflagration in the Middle East leading to the crumbling of all the enemies of Israel, with Syria and Iran high on the list. So they outbid everyone and gave the operation the scale they wanted with the help of their New York super-sayan\u00a0<\/i>Silvertein. George W. Bush, Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice, and other goyim who had been kept out of the loop, finding themselves embroiled in geopolitical machinations of global scope, could merely try to save face. On September 19 and 20, Richard Perle\u2019s Defense Policy Board met in the company of Paul Wolfowitz and Bernard Lewis (inventor of the self-fulfilling prophecy of the \u201cclash of civilizations\u201d) but in the absence of Powell and Rice. They prepared a letter to Bush, written on PNAC letterhead, to remind him of his historic mission: \u201cEven if evidence does not link Iraq directly to the attack, any strategy aiming at the eradication of terrorism and its sponsors must include a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq. Failure to undertake such an effort will constitute an early and perhaps decisive surrender in the war on international terrorism.\u201d[12]<\/i><\/a>\u00a0This was an ultimatum. Bush was certainly aware of the leverage that the neocons had acquired over the major print and television media. He was obliged, under penalty of ending in the proverbial trash bin of history, to endorse the invasion of Iraq that his father had refused the Zionists ten years earlier.<\/span><\/p>\n As for Brzezinski and other genuine U.S. imperialists, their support for the invasion of Afghanistan made their timid protests against the Iraq war ineffective. It was a little late in February 2007 when Brzezinski denounced before the Senate \u201ca historical, strategic and moral calamity [\u2026] driven by Manichaean impulses and imperial hubris.\u201d In 2012 he declared, regarding the risk of conflagration with Iran, that Obama should\u00a0stop following Israel like a \u201cstupid mule.\u201d<\/a>\u00a0He soon disappeared from the MSM, as a useful idiot no longer useful.<\/span><\/p>\n The \u201chalf truth\u201d of the exclusively \u201cinside job\u201d theory, which denounces 9\/11 as a false flag operation perpetrated by the American state on its own citizens, functions like a secondary false flag hiding the real masters of the operation, who are in fact agents in the service of a foreign nation. One of the aims of this inside-jobish controlled opposition is to force American officials to maintain the \u201cbin Laden did it\u201d masquerade, knowing that tearing apart the fake Islamic flag would only reveal the U.S. flag, not the Israeli flag. No longer controlling the media, they would not have the means to raise this second veil to expose Israel. Any effort to get at the truth would be political suicide. Everyone understands what is at stake: if one day, under mounting pressure from public opinion or for some other strategic reason, the mainstream media abandons the official bin Laden story, the well-rehearsed slogan \u201c9\/11 was an inside job\u201d will have prepared Americans to turn against their own government, while the neocon Zionists will remain untouchable (Machiavelli\u2019s method: make another accomplish your dirty ends, then turn popular vengeance against him). And God knows what will happen, if the government has not by then succeeded in disarming its citizens through Sandy Hook-type psy-ops. Government officials have little choice but to stick to the Al-Qaeda story, at least for the next fifty years.<\/span><\/p>\n After reaching this conclusion in\u00a0JFK-9\/11<\/i>, I had the satisfaction of finding that Victor Thorn, in a book that had eluded me (Made in Israel: 9-11 and the Jewish Plot Against America,\u00a0<\/i>Sisyphus Press, 2011<\/a>), had already expressed it in harsher terms: \u201cIn essence, the \u20189-11 truth movement\u2019 was created\u00a0prior\u00a0<\/i>to Sept. 11, 2001 as a means of suppressing news relating to Israeli complicity. By 2002\u20132003, \u2018truthers\u2019 began appearing at rallies holding placards that read \u20189-11 was an inside job.\u2019 Initially, these signs provided hope for those who didn\u2019t believe the government and mainstream media\u2019s absurd cover stories. But then an awful realization emerged: The slogan \u20189-11 was an inside job\u2019 was quite possibly the greatest example of Israeli propaganda ever devised. [\u2026] The mantra, \u20189-11 was an inside job\u2019 is only partially true and is inherently damaging to the \u2018truth movement\u2019 because it shifts all attention away from Israel\u2019s traitorous assault against America. [\u2026] Leaders of these fake 9-11 groups know the truth about Israel\u2019s 9-11 barbarity. Their willingness to perpetuate or cover it up ultimately makes them as guilty and vile as those who launched the attacks. There are no degrees of separation in this matter. It\u2019s a black-and-white issue. Tell the entire truth about Israel\u2019s Murder, Inc. cabal, or sleep in the same infected bed as these murdering dogs lie in. [\u2026] Faux conspiratologists complain about the government and news sources not telling the truth, yet they\u2019ve erected an utter blackout on data regarding Israel and 9-11.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n Some readers will complain that I am making a very complex operation appear too simple. I plead guilty: I have merely tried here to outline the case against Israel in the short scope of an article. But I am fully aware that creating Greater Israel through a world war fought by the U.S. might not have been the only consideration in the preparation of 9\/11. Many private interests had to be involved. Yet I believe none of them interfered with Israel\u2019s plan, and most of them supported it.<\/span><\/p>\n There is, for example, the\u00a0missing gold in the WTC basement<\/a>\u00a0: $200 million were recovered from the estimated $1 billion stored: who took the rest? But that is nothing compared to the $2.3 trillion that were missing from the accounts of the Department of Defense for the year 2000, in addition to $1.1 trillion missing for 1999, according to a televised declaration made on September 10th<\/sup>, 2001, the day before the attacks, by Donald Rumsfeld. Just for comparison, this is more than one thousand times the colossal losses of Enron, which triggered a chain of bankruptcies that same year. All this money evaporated into thin air under the watch of William Cohen, Defense Secretary during Bill Clinton\u2019s second term. In 2001, the man who was tasked to help track down the missing trillions was Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) Dov Zakheim, a member of PNAC and an ordained rabbi. Practically, the mystery had to be resolved by financial analysts at Resource Services Washington (RSW). Unfortunately, their offices were destroyed by \u201cal-Qaeda\u201d the following morning. The \u201chijackers\u201d or Flight AA77, rather than hitting the command center on the eastern side of the Pentagon, chose to attempt a theoretically impossible downward spiral at 180 degrees in order to hit the west side of the building precisely at the location of the accounting offices. The 34 experts at RSW perished in their offices, together with 12 other financial analysts, as is noted in the biography of the team leader Robert Russell for the\u00a0National 9\/11 Pentagon Memorial<\/a>: \u201cThe weekend before his death, his entire office attended a crab feast at the Russell home. They were celebrating the end of the fiscal-year budget completion. Tragically, every person that attended that party was involved in the Pentagon explosion, and are currently missing\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n By an incredible coincidence, one of the financial experts trying to make sense of the Pentagon financial loss, Bryan Jack, was reported to have died at the precise location of his office, not because he was working there that day, but because he was on a business trip on Flight AA77. In the words of the\u00a0Washington Post<\/i>\u00a0database<\/a>: \u201cBryan C. Jack was responsible for crunching America\u2019s defense budget. He was a passenger on American Airlines Flight 77, bound for official business in California when his plane struck the Pentagon, where, on any other day, Jack would have been at work at his computer\u201d. Yahweh must have a sense of chutzpah!<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Laurent Guy\u00e9not is the author of\u00a0JFK-9\/11: 50 years of Deep State<\/i>, Progressive Press, 2014<\/a>, and\u00a0From Yahweh to Zion: Jealous God, Chosen People, Promised Land \u2026 Clash of Civilizations<\/i><\/a>, 2018. (or $30 shipping included from Sifting and Winnowing, POB 221, Lone Rock, WI 53556).<\/span><\/p>\nInside Job or Mossad Job?<\/a><\/h2>\n
The dancing Israelis<\/a><\/h2>\n
The Israeli spy network<\/a><\/h2>\n
The super-sayanim<\/a><\/h2>\n
Machiavellian meta-Zionists<\/a><\/h2>\n
The Project for a new (((American))) Century<\/a><\/h2>\n
The Hanukkah miracle to start WWIV<\/a><\/h2>\n
The hijacked conspiracy and the controlled opposition<\/a><\/h2>\n
The missing .3 trillion<\/a><\/h2>\n