<\/p>\n
Massive <\/i><\/b>conflict of interest<\/i><\/b><\/span> revealed in gadolinium-poisoning prosecution as county-owned hospital and court share the same employer<\/i><\/b><\/i><\/b><\/p>\n LAS VEGAS \u2014 The truth has finally come into focus: the Clark County District Court (Eighth Judicial District Court), the Clark County District Attorney\u2019s Office, and UMC Children\u2019s Hospital are all owned and operated by the same county government.<\/b> That single fact now explains the extraordinary, and allegedly unlawful, steps Chief Deputy District Attorney Dena Rinetti<\/b> has taken to halt a trial that would expose medical wrongdoing inside a county-run hospital.<\/p>\n According to an Emergency Motion to Disqualify Dena Rinetti for Malicious Prosecution<\/i><\/b> filed pro se<\/i> by Austin Sachs<\/b> on October 17, 2025<\/b> (Case No. C-19-343540-2), Rinetti\u2019s pattern of conduct reveals an institutional cover-up disguised as prosecution. The motion details how she illegally stayed the trial<\/b>, fabricated bench warrants<\/b>, and even called Arkansas Child Protective Services<\/b> to stage a \u201cwelfare check\u201d on the family, despite the child already being examined and cleared by three doctors, Dr. Richard Semelka<\/b>, Dr. Jeff Baker<\/b>, and Dr. Paul Drake<\/b>, as well as receiving daily oversight from staff at Ola Christian Academy<\/b> and Legacy Christian Academy<\/b>.<\/p>\n Dr. Semelka, the world\u2019s foremost expert on gadolinium toxicity<\/b>, provided the court with a four-page expert report on January 13, 2025<\/b>, confirming that the child\u2019s condition was Gadolinium Deposition Disease (GDD), <\/b>a medically recognized disorder with official ICD-10 codes adopted in 2023<\/b>. His findings completely exonerated the parents<\/b> and placed responsibility squarely on the medical staff at UMC Children\u2019s Hospital.<\/p>\n Rather than acknowledge that evidence, Rinetti allegedly acted to protect her real client: Clark County itself<\/b>, which owns UMC and faces massive civil exposure if the truth is aired in open court. By weaponizing the criminal process to shield the county\u2019s financial and political interests, she has effectively served as defense counsel for the very institution under investigation, <\/b>an arrangement that violates every standard of prosecutorial ethics and due-process law.<\/p>\n The Sachs motion argues that this structural conflict of interest has corrupted the entire proceeding<\/b>, transforming a legitimate criminal inquiry into a county-sponsored act of retaliation. It calls Rinetti\u2019s actions \u201ca bad-faith abuse of authority and conflict of interest so profound that it shocks the conscience,\u201d and warns that her repeated fraud and misrepresentations strip her of any claim to prosecutorial immunity.<\/b><\/b><\/p>\n Clark County residents are urged to examine the filings themselves and demand accountability for what could become one of Nevada\u2019s most consequential justice-system scandals.<\/p>\n If proven, these revelations will show how a single county\u2019s control over its hospital, court, and prosecutors created the perfect storm for institutional self-protection at the expense of innocent parents, and at the cost of public trust.<\/b><\/p>\n FULL MEDIA COVERAGE Alex Falconi<\/b>, of our Our Nevada Judges<\/b><\/span> media company is graciously providing full media coverage of this criminal frame-up to include full coverage of the upcoming trial (date to be determined soon).<\/p>\n The YouTube link<\/b> to his channel for this case is here:<\/p>\n\n
\n<\/b>\u00a0https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/2025-10-17-EMERGENCY-MOTION-TO-DISQUALIFY-DA-DENA-RINETTI-FOR-MALICIOUS-PROSECUTION-SACHS.pdf<\/b><\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n<\/b><\/p>\n