{"id":18686,"date":"2025-05-01T14:53:37","date_gmt":"2025-05-01T18:53:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/?p=18686"},"modified":"2025-05-01T14:53:37","modified_gmt":"2025-05-01T18:53:37","slug":"new-florida-brand-differential-study-shows-the-pfizer-vaccine-likely-killed-over-470000-americans","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.info\/?p=18686","title":{"rendered":"

New Florida brand differential study shows the Pfizer vaccine likely KILLED over 470,000 Americans<\/b><\/h2>"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

This stunning brand comparison study shows the Pfizer shots increased your risk of death by at least 36%. Vaccines are NEVER supposed to INCREASE your risk of death.<\/h3>\n

Steve Kirsch<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Executive summary<\/h3>\n

Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo is a hero.<\/p>\n

He is the only health authority in America who looks critically at his own health data.<\/p>\n

What did he find when he did that?<\/p>\n

By looking at his own health data with a critical eye, he found that people who got the Pfizer vaccine had a stunning 36% increase in their all cause mortality lasting at least a year after they got vaccinated.<\/p>\n

This is a train wreck. Vaccines should NEVER increase all-cause mortality.<\/p>\n

Kudos to Ladapo for looking at his own data.<\/p>\n

Maybe someday, we\u2019ll have a second honest health official in America.<\/p>\n

Then Joe will have someone to talk to.<\/p>\n

The smoking gun<\/h3>\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

If the COVID vaccine was safe, the non-COVID ACM of the cohorts would be identical. If they are different, it means the vaccine with the higher NCACM increases your ACM by at least the difference.<\/p>\n

Vaccine comparison study shows Pfizer shots increased your risk of death<\/h3>\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

This new paper that just came out: Twelve-Month All-Cause Mortality after Initial COVID-19 Vaccination with Pfizer-BioNTech or mRNA-1273 among Adults Living in Florida<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The paper compares the non-COVID all-cause mortality (NCACM) between the 2 major vaccine brands using a very careful matching methodology.<\/p>\n

The results were stunning. If you got the Pfizer shots, over the next 12 months, your mortality was 36% higher than Moderna. That\u2019s causality<\/strong>. No hedging any more. This study is definitive and bulletproof. They did everything right.<\/p>\n

Let\u2019s assume to be super generous that the Moderna shots are super safe and don\u2019t increase all-cause mortality (ACM) at all. That\u2019s not true of course, but this is the best case.<\/p>\n

That means that the Pfizer shots, at a minimum, must increase your ACM by at least 36%.<\/p>\n

So that means that Pfizer, single-handedly, likely killed at least 470,000 Americans<\/strong> if the results in other states are similar to what they found when they looked in Florida.<\/p>\n

The excuse that \u201cyeah, but there was a net benefit due to the lives saved from COVID\u201d is complete BS because COVID was at best a 20% mortality problem, and 36%-20% = 16%. So it was nonsensical to recommend the Pfizer shot for anyone, regardless of age; the math doesn\u2019t work for any age.<\/p>\n

Now it\u2019s possible that all the bad Pfizer batches went only to Florida, but that seems highly unlikely due to the strict quality control measures that the FDA has in place.<\/p>\n

The vDFR is greater than the infection fatality rate so even if the vaccine was 100% effective, it kills > saves<\/h3>\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

The resulting vaccine dose fatality rate (vDFR)=0.157% for Pfizer.<\/p>\n

This is nearly identical to the vDFR numbers that Andre Redert found in his 30 country EU study, one of the best studies of the pandemic<\/a> (he calls it VFR).<\/p>\n

Isn\u2019t it amazing that nobody inside the FDA, CDC, NIH, or Congress (except Senator Ron Johnson) is calling for the shots to be stopped?<\/p>\n

This study, which was VERY carefully done, exposes:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. A major failure of all vaccine safety monitoring systems worldwide<\/li>\n
  2. A major failure of the mainstream medical community to identify vaccine safety problems<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    What will happen now is profuse apologies from the drug makers, the regulators, the mainstream media, and the mainstream medical community for not being able to spot such a gigantic safety problem. Unfortunately, this will only happen in my dreams.<\/p>\n

    Bulletproof from attacks<\/h3>\n
    \n
    \n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    This paper is as bulletproof as it gets.<\/p>\n

    For example, \u201cthey didn\u2019t match comorbidities.\u201d The paper addresses this directly: \u201cDifferences in these conditions could bias the analysis, although prior population studies using fewer criteria for matching have demonstrated that the omission of comorbid conditions does not appear to increase the risk of bias.\u201d<\/p>\n

    The Law of Large Numbers<\/strong> ensures that randomly selected large cohorts<\/strong> will be similar in their characteristics<\/strong> (e.g., age, BMI, comorbidities), assuming true randomness \u2014 this is what allows us to treat them as \u201cbalanced\u201d groups. The distribution of vaccines was quasi-random and the negative controls confirmed that lack of systemic or systematic bias.<\/p>\n

    Others said \u201cyou didn\u2019t include the unvaccinated.\u201d So what? This study was to verify that the COVID vaccines were both safe. Don\u2019t need the unvaccinated for that.<\/p>\n

    ChatGPT calculation verification<\/h3>\n
    \n
    \n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    Given:<\/h2>\n
    \n
    \n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n